Game #52 - February 2, 2025 - Montreal 2 at Anaheim 3
Game #52 - February 2, 2025
  Montreal   2   at     Anaheim   3

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Caufield14 Suzuki20 Slafkovsky
10:58 10:58 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson28 Dvorak11 Gallagher
6:49 6:49 0:00 0:00 E
15 Newhook77 Dach92 Laine
5:21 5:21 0:00 0:00 -1
55 Pezzetta71 Evans40 Armia
5:20 5:20 0:00 0:00 -1
13 Caufield - 14 Suzuki - 20 Slafkovsky - 92 Laine 3:56 0:00 3:56 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 15 Newhook - 28 Dvorak - 77 Dach 3:28 0:08 3:20 0:00 E
17 Anderson71 Evans40 Armia
2:45 2:42 0:03 0:00 E
40 Armia71 Evans
2:40 0:03 0:00 2:37 +1
15 Newhook71 Evans40 Armia
2:19 2:19 0:00 0:00 E
17 Anderson28 Dvorak
2:06 0:00 0:00 2:06 E
13 Caufield - 14 Suzuki - 28 Dvorak - 40 Armia 1:34 1:34 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki40 Armia
1:06 0:00 0:00 1:06 E
Others 11:38 10:40 0:41 0:17 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Matheson48 Hutson
13:32 13:31 0:01 0:00 -1
72 Xhekaj45 Carrier
12:52 11:11 0:03 1:38 -1
47 Struble58 Savard
7:49 7:49 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Matheson58 Savard
5:36 2:33 0:00 3:03 +1
48 Hutson
4:18 0:00 4:18 0:00 E
  8 Matheson
3:45 0:07 3:38 0:00 E
72 Xhekaj  8 Matheson
2:13 1:30 0:00 0:43 E
47 Struble48 Hutson
2:09 2:09 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Matheson45 Carrier
1:47 1:47 0:00 0:00 E
48 Hutson45 Carrier
1:36 1:36 0:00 0:00 E
72 Xhekaj48 Hutson
1:21 1:21 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:02 2:20 0:00 0:42 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13CC
14NS
20JS
17JA
28CD
11BG
15AN
77KD
92PL
55MP
71JE
40JA
13CC
14NS
20JS
92PL
11BG
15AN
28CD
77KD
17JA
71JE
40JA
40JA
71JE
15AN
71JE
40JA
17JA
28CD
8MM
48LH
72AX
45AC
47JS
58DS
8MM
58DS
48LH 8MM 72AX
8MM
47JS
48LH
13 Fabbri - 21 Lundestrom - 20 Leason 6:37 0:21 0:27           0:44   6:27 1:02 2:03 0:41     0:01 0:02
11 Zegras - 16 Strome - 77 Vatrano 0:59 4:25 1:06 0:27     2:15 0:01 0:31   1:48 4:30 1:55 0:42     0:09 0:23
17 Killorn - 23 McTavish - 91 Carlsson 1:08 0:36 2:06 1:32       0:01     3:22 1:32 0:12 0:54     0:28 0:02
44 Johnston - 38 Harkins - 61 Gauthier   0:46 0:19 2:09     0:18 0:01 0:31   0:02 1:15 2:56       0:11 0:04
17 Killorn - 21 Lundestrom         2:18 0:51                 2:22 1:02    
11 Zegras - 16 Strome - 23 McTavish - 77 Vatrano               1:12   1:15   0:01   2:18     0:24  
17 Killorn - 61 Gauthier - 13 Fabbri - 91 Carlsson               1:03   0:44   1:27   0:22     0:12  
2 Lacombe - 7 Gudas 5:44 1:12 1:44 0:46 1:39 1:35 1:07   0:07   6:13 3:40 1:17 0:29 1:51 1:35 0:31 0:17
51 Zellweger - 65 Trouba 0:34 3:20 1:08 1:38     1:18 0:02 1:53 0:07 1:29 3:30 3:19 1:28     0:23 0:38
6 Dumoulin - 43 Helleson 3:05 1:40 2:01 2:39 0:16 0:39 0:12 0:01 0:01   4:46 2:44 2:18 0:31 0:16 0:45 0:25 0:31
6 Dumoulin - 65 Trouba 0:27 0:25     1:56 1:11         0:26 0:22 0:15   1:56 1:21    
2 Lacombe               1:27   0:55   0:09   2:33     0:04  
51 Zellweger               0:55   1:04   1:30   0:12     0:32  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Anderson-Dvorak 48.7% 48.7%    
Newhook-Dvorak-Dach 24.8% 1.0% 23.8%  
Caufield-Dvorak 5.4% 5.4%    
Anderson-Evans 4.5% 4.5%    
Newhook-Slafkovsky-Evans 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 13.3% 11.4% 1.9%  
Totals   74.3% 25.7%  
13 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 54.5% 54.5%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Laine 19.5%   19.5%  
Suzuki-Dvorak-Armia 7.8% 7.8%    
Dach-Slafkovsky 3.7% 3.7%    
Dvorak-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 10.8% 10.0% 0.7%  
Totals   79.7% 20.3%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Slafkovsky 50.6% 50.6%    
Caufield-Slafkovsky-Laine 18.1%   18.1%  
Caufield-Dvorak-Armia 7.2% 7.2%    
Armia 5.1%     5.1%
Newhook-Slafkovsky 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 14.8% 12.5% 1.8% 0.5%
Totals   74.5% 19.9% 5.6%
15 Newhook
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dach-Laine 33.6% 33.6%    
Gallagher-Dvorak-Dach 21.8% 0.8% 20.9%  
Evans-Armia 14.5% 14.5%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 5.8% 5.8%    
Suzuki-Armia 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 19.5% 17.3% 2.2%  
Totals   76.9% 23.1%  
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dvorak-Gallagher 47.8% 47.8%    
Evans-Armia 19.3% 18.9% 0.4%  
Dvorak 14.7%     14.7%
Evans-Gallagher 4.4% 4.4%    
Dach-Newhook 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 10.0% 9.0%   1.1%
Totals   83.9% 0.4% 15.8%
20 Slafkovsky
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 58.3% 58.3%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Laine 20.9%   20.9%  
Newhook-Suzuki 4.9% 4.9%    
Caufield-Dach 4.0% 4.0%    
Gallagher-Newhook-Evans 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 9.6% 6.4% 3.2%  
Totals   75.9% 24.1%  
28 Dvorak
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Anderson-Gallagher 39.0% 39.0%    
Gallagher-Newhook-Dach 19.8% 0.8% 19.0%  
Anderson 12.0%     12.0%
Caufield-Suzuki-Armia 9.0% 9.0%    
Caufield-Gallagher 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 16.0% 12.8% 2.9% 0.4%
Totals   65.7% 21.9% 12.4%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pezzetta-Evans 30.4% 30.4%    
Anderson-Evans 15.7% 15.4% 0.3%  
Evans 15.2% 0.3%   14.9%
Newhook-Evans 13.2% 13.2%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Dvorak 8.9% 8.9%    
Others 16.7% 10.3%   6.4%
Totals   78.5% 0.3% 21.3%
55 Pezzetta
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Armia 88.9% 88.9%    
Dvorak-Gallagher 6.4% 6.4%    
Evans-Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Evans 0.6% 0.6%    
Evans-Newhook 0.3% 0.3%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pezzetta-Armia 34.9% 34.9%    
Anderson-Armia 18.0% 17.6% 0.3%  
Armia 17.4% 0.3%   17.1%
Newhook-Armia 15.1% 15.1%    
Anderson-Gallagher 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 10.5% 9.3%   1.2%
Totals   81.4% 0.3% 18.3%
77 Dach
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Laine 44.8% 44.8%    
Gallagher-Newhook-Dvorak 29.0% 1.1% 27.9%  
Caufield-Slafkovsky 6.3% 6.3%    
Anderson-Newhook 4.5% 4.5%    
Caufield-Laine 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 11.9% 11.9%    
Totals   72.1% 27.9%  
92 Laine
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Newhook-Dach 50.7% 50.7%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky 37.3%   37.3%  
Caufield-Dach 4.1% 4.1%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Dvorak 1.9%   1.9%  
Caufield-Newhook-Slafkovsky 1.4%   1.4%  
Others 4.6% 3.5% 1.1%  
Totals   58.3% 41.7%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Matheson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hutson 48.4% 48.3% 0.1%  
Savard 20.0% 9.1%   10.9%
  13.4% 0.4% 13.0%  
Xhekaj 7.9% 5.4%   2.6%
Carrier 6.4% 6.4%    
Others 3.9% 3.8%   0.1%
Totals   73.4% 13.1% 13.5%
45 Carrier
Partner Total EV PP SH
Xhekaj 72.3% 62.8% 0.3% 9.2%
Matheson 10.0% 10.0%    
Hutson 9.0% 9.0%    
Struble 4.8% 4.8%    
Savard 3.4% 0.2%   3.2%
Others 0.6% 0.4%   0.2%
Totals   87.2% 0.3% 12.5%
47 Struble
Partner Total EV PP SH
Savard 65.0% 65.0%    
Hutson 17.9% 17.9%    
Matheson 7.3% 7.3%    
Carrier 7.1% 7.1%    
Xhekaj 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
48 Hutson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Matheson 58.6% 58.6% 0.1%  
  18.6%   18.6%  
Struble 9.3% 9.3%    
Carrier 6.9% 6.9%    
Xhekaj 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   81.3% 18.7%  
58 Savard
Partner Total EV PP SH
Struble 54.2% 54.2%    
Matheson 38.8% 17.7%   21.1%
Carrier 4.2% 0.2%   3.9%
Xhekaj 1.4% 0.7%   0.7%
Matheson-Struble 0.5% 0.5%    
Others 1.0% 0.8%   0.2%
Totals   74.0%   26.0%
72 Xhekaj
Partner Total EV PP SH
Carrier 76.1% 66.1% 0.3% 9.7%
Matheson 13.1% 8.9%   4.2%
Hutson 8.0% 8.0%    
Savard 1.2% 0.6%   0.6%
Struble 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.9% 0.8%   0.1%
Totals   85.1% 0.3% 14.6%

Back to main page