Game #46 - February 10, 2022 - Washington 5 at Montreal 2
Game #46 - February 10, 2022
  Washington   5   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
32 Pitlick71 Evans17 Anderson
 11:24 11:22 0:02 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki73 Toffoli
 8:39 8:39 0:00 0:00 E
68 Hoffman41 Byron11 Gallagher
 6:44 6:44 0:00 0:00 -2
40 Armia25 Poehling22 Caufield
 4:54 4:54 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 22 Caufield - 68 Hoffman - 73 Toffoli 2:48 0:00 2:48 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 22 Caufield - 62 Lehkonen - 68 Hoffman - 73 Toffoli 2:26 2:26 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki73 Toffoli
 1:52 0:23 0:00 1:29 E
14 Suzuki - 62 Lehkonen - 68 Hoffman - 73 Toffoli 1:47 0:00 1:47 0:00 E
32 Pitlick14 Suzuki17 Anderson
 1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 17 Anderson - 22 Caufield - 32 Pitlick 1:05 0:00 1:05 0:00 E
Others 17:15 12:04 2:00 3:11 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
27 Romanov  8 Chiarot
 15:13 13:47 0:20 1:06 -1
77 Kulak26 Petry
 8:20 7:50 0:00 0:30 -2
20 Wideman
 7:12 2:23 4:49 0:00 E
77 Kulak43 Clague
 4:56 4:10 0:00 0:46 E
43 Clague20 Wideman
 3:54 3:54 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 3:18 2:12 0:04 1:02 E
26 Petry
 3:04 0:38 2:26 0:00 -1
43 Clague26 Petry
 2:16 2:16 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak27 Romanov
 1:57 1:43 0:00 0:14 E
27 Romanov20 Wideman
 1:56 1:56 0:00 0:00 E
27 Romanov43 Clague
 1:42 1:42 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot20 Wideman
 1:37 1:37 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak20 Wideman
 1:29 1:29 0:00 0:00 E
27 Romanov26 Petry
 1:05 0:07 0:00 0:58 E
Others 2:01 1:54 0:03 0:04 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 32RP
71JE
17JA		 62AL
14NS
73TT		 68MH
41PB
11BG		 40JA
25RP
22CC		 14NS
22CC
68MH
73TT		 14NS
22CC
62AL
68MH
73TT		 27AR
8BC		 77BK
26JP		 20CW 77BK
43KC		 43KC
20CW		 8BC
26JP		 26JP 43KC
26JP
62 Hagelin - 26 Dowd - 21 Hathaway 2:17 2:50 1:47 1:07   0:50 2:33 0:43 0:50 2:32 3:07 0:01   1:27
91 Snively - 92 Kuznetsov - 43 Wilson 1:00 1:30 2:52 0:51   0:42 2:12 2:16 0:39   0:12 0:38 0:25  
73 Sheary - 19 Backstrom - 10 Sprong 4:48 1:26 0:39       2:58 2:11   0:27   0:49   0:37
24 McMichael - 20 Eller - 49 Leason 1:19 1:49 0:47 1:55     1:35 0:52   0:01 0:26      
62 Hagelin - 26 Dowd 0:01       1:39   0:08 0:14 2:09       0:59  
92 Kuznetsov - 43 Wilson         1:05   0:48   1:52          
73 Sheary - 19 Backstrom - 92 Kuznetsov - 43 Wilson             1:07 0:14   0:02        
10 Sprong - 20 Eller - 21 Hathaway 0:12                 1:00   1:06    
42 Fehervary - 74 Carlson 6:32 3:17 1:11 0:34 0:15   3:51 3:46 0:51 0:33 1:04 0:22 1:08 0:39
3 Jensen - 9 Orlov 1:32 2:51 0:27 2:20     4:21 1:13     0:48 0:15   1:13
3 Jensen - 57 Van Riemsdyk 0:52 0:56 0:04 0:35 2:26 0:34 1:34   4:12 0:49   0:13 0:25  
2 Schultz - 9 Orlov 0:56 0:19 1:33 0:36     2:24 0:32   1:47 0:29 2:15   0:11
2 Schultz - 57 Van Riemsdyk 0:30 0:43 2:55 0:31     0:45 2:17   0:53 1:22 0:01    
9 Orlov - 74 Carlson         0:04 1:49     1:54       1:15  
74 Carlson     0:01       1:07 0:14   0:02       0:01

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hoffman-Byron 55.6% 55.6%    
Anderson-Caufield-Pitlick 8.9%   8.9%  
Anderson-Poehling-Pitlick 6.5% 1.8% 4.7%  
Lehkonen-Byron 4.3% 4.3%    
Hoffman-Poehling 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 20.6% 12.7% 8.0%  
Totals   78.4% 21.6%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Toffoli 35.6% 35.6%    
Caufield-Hoffman-Toffoli 11.5%   11.5%  
Caufield-Lehkonen-Hoffman-Toffoli 10.0% 10.0%    
Toffoli 7.7% 1.6%   6.1%
Lehkonen-Hoffman-Toffoli 7.3%   7.3%  
Others 27.9% 20.1% 3.4% 4.4%
Totals   67.2% 22.3% 10.5%
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pitlick-Evans 65.3% 65.1% 0.2%  
Pitlick-Suzuki 6.3% 6.3%    
Gallagher-Caufield-Pitlick 6.2%   6.2%  
Gallagher-Poehling-Pitlick 4.5% 1.2% 3.2%  
Evans 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 14.7% 8.6% 6.1%  
Totals   84.2% 15.8%  
22 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Armia-Poehling 35.2% 35.2%    
Suzuki-Hoffman-Toffoli 20.1%   20.1%  
Suzuki-Lehkonen-Hoffman-Toffoli 17.5% 17.5%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Pitlick 7.8%   7.8%  
Armia-Suzuki 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 14.5% 10.7% 3.8%  
Totals   68.3% 31.7%  
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Armia-Caufield 51.3% 51.3%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Pitlick 8.2% 2.3% 5.9%  
Armia-Byron 5.4% 3.8% 1.6%  
Hoffman-Gallagher 5.2% 5.2%    
Pitlick-Evans 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 25.3% 25.1% 0.2%  
Totals   92.3% 7.7%  
32 Pitlick
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Anderson 66.2% 66.0% 0.2%  
Suzuki-Anderson 6.4% 6.4%    
Gallagher-Anderson-Caufield 6.3%   6.3%  
Gallagher-Anderson-Poehling 4.5% 1.3% 3.3%  
Evans-Poehling 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 14.0% 10.8% 3.2%  
Totals   87.0% 13.0%  
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Caufield 48.5% 48.5%    
Byron 9.4%     9.4%
Lehkonen-Byron 6.9% 6.9%    
Suzuki-Caufield 6.8% 6.8%    
Suzuki-Toffoli 6.4% 6.4%    
Others 21.9% 15.0% 1.5% 5.4%
Totals   83.7% 1.5% 14.9%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hoffman-Gallagher 56.7% 56.7%    
Armia 8.0%     8.0%
Lehkonen-Armia 5.9% 5.9%    
Armia-Poehling 4.3% 3.1% 1.3%  
Lehkonen-Gallagher 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 20.8% 14.3% 0.1% 6.3%
Totals   84.3% 1.4% 14.3%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Toffoli 48.8% 48.8%    
Suzuki-Caufield-Hoffman-Toffoli 13.7% 13.7%    
Suzuki-Hoffman-Toffoli 10.1%   10.1%  
Byron-Armia 4.0% 4.0%    
Toffoli-Caufield 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 20.2% 10.0% 0.9% 9.3%
Totals   79.7% 11.0% 9.3%
68 Hoffman
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Gallagher 38.1% 38.1%    
Suzuki-Caufield-Toffoli 15.9%   15.9%  
Suzuki-Caufield-Lehkonen-Toffoli 13.8% 13.8%    
Suzuki-Lehkonen-Toffoli 10.1%   10.1%  
Suzuki-Toffoli 4.8% 4.8%    
Others 17.3% 13.1% 4.2%  
Totals   69.9% 30.1%  
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pitlick-Anderson 77.6% 77.3% 0.2%  
Anderson 3.5% 3.5%    
Pitlick-Poehling 2.9% 2.9%    
Hoffman-Gallagher 2.8% 2.8%    
Lehkonen 2.7%     2.7%
Others 10.4% 9.9%   0.6%
Totals   96.5% 0.2% 3.3%
73 Toffoli
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 42.4% 42.4%    
Suzuki-Caufield-Hoffman 13.7%   13.7%  
Suzuki-Caufield-Lehkonen-Hoffman 11.9% 11.9%    
Suzuki 9.1% 1.9%   7.3%
Suzuki-Lehkonen-Hoffman 8.7%   8.7%  
Others 14.1% 14.0% 0.2%  
Totals   70.1% 22.6% 7.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Romanov 69.6% 63.0% 1.5% 5.0%
Petry 15.1% 10.1% 0.3% 4.7%
Wideman 7.4% 7.4%    
Clague 4.2% 4.2%    
Kulak 2.7% 2.6%   0.2%
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   88.3% 1.8% 9.9%
20 Wideman
Partner Total EV PP SH
  43.9% 14.5% 29.4%  
Clague 23.8% 23.8%    
Romanov 11.8% 11.8%    
Chiarot 9.9% 9.9%    
Kulak 9.1% 9.1%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   70.6% 29.4%  
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 45.6% 42.9%   2.7%
Chiarot 18.1% 12.0% 0.4% 5.7%
  16.8% 3.5% 13.3%  
Clague 12.4% 12.4%    
Romanov 5.9% 0.6%   5.3%
Others 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   72.6% 13.7% 13.7%
27 Romanov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 68.5% 62.0% 1.5% 5.0%
Kulak 8.8% 7.7%   1.1%
Wideman 8.7% 8.7%    
Clague 7.7% 7.7%    
Petry 4.9% 0.5%   4.4%
Others 1.5% 1.1% 0.2% 0.2%
Totals   87.8% 1.7% 10.5%
43 Clague
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 35.7% 30.2%   5.6%
Wideman 28.3% 28.3%    
Petry 16.4% 16.4%    
Romanov 12.3% 12.3%    
Chiarot 6.6% 6.6%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   94.4%   5.6%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 47.9% 45.0%   2.9%
Clague 28.4% 23.9%   4.4%
Romanov 11.2% 9.9%   1.3%
Wideman 8.5% 8.5%    
Chiarot 3.4% 3.3%   0.2%
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   91.2%   8.8%
Back to main page