Game #14 - June 18, 2021 - Vegas 2 at Montreal 3 (OT)
Game #14 - June 18, 2021
  Vegas   2   at     Montreal   3     (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
73 Toffoli14 Suzuki22 Caufield
12:05 12:05 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen24 Danault11 Gallagher
10:47 10:47 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia21 Staal94 Perry
8:49 8:49 0:00 0:00 -1
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi17 Anderson
8:21 8:21 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
3:24 0:00 0:00 3:24 E
11 Gallagher15 Kotkaniemi17 Anderson
2:08 0:29 1:39 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 22 Caufield - 73 Toffoli - 94 Perry 2:05 0:00 2:05 0:00 E
40 Armia41 Byron
1:21 0:00 0:00 1:21 E
14 Suzuki73 Toffoli
1:09 0:07 0:00 1:02 E
41 Byron24 Danault15 Kotkaniemi
1:07 1:07 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia15 Kotkaniemi17 Anderson
1:05 1:05 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault41 Byron
1:04 0:00 0:00 1:04 E
Others 19:28 18:03 0:16 1:09 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
19:07 14:52 0:00 4:15 +2
44 Edmundson26 Petry
15:24 15:24 0:00 0:00 -1
28 Merrill26 Petry
4:54 4:06 0:00 0:48 +1
44 Edmundson  6 Weber
4:52 4:52 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
4:06 4:06 0:00 0:00 E
44 Edmundson28 Merrill
4:02 2:17 0:00 1:45 E
  8 Chiarot28 Merrill
4:01 4:01 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber26 Petry
3:07 1:38 1:29 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot44 Edmundson
3:02 1:50 0:00 1:12 -1
32 Gustafsson26 Petry
2:31 2:31 0:00 0:00 E
28 Merrill  6 Weber
2:30 2:30 0:00 0:00 E
32 Gustafsson
1:55 0:00 1:55 0:00 E
32 Gustafsson  6 Weber
1:34 1:18 0:16 0:00 E
Others 1:48 1:28 0:20 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 73TT
14NS
22CC
62AL
24PD
11BG
40JA
21ES
94CP
41PB
15JK
17JA
24PD
62AL
11BG
15JK
17JA
14NS
22CC
73TT
94CP
8BC
6SW
44JE
26JP
28JM
26JP
44JE
6SW
8BC
26JP
44JE
28JM
8BC
28JM
6SW
26JP
8BC
44JE
32EG
26JP
28JM
6SW
81 Marchessault - 71 Karlsson - 19 Smith 8:43 1:59 0:57 0:24 1:15     8:40 3:53 1:24 0:38 0:36 1:16 0:55 0:29 0:07 0:34 0:06
67 Pacioretty - 89 Tuch - 61 Stone 0:35 5:27   0:45 0:09     3:27 3:00 0:18 0:40 0:27   0:51 0:11 0:01 0:33 0:23
26 Janmark - 10 Roy - 55 Kolesar   0:20 0:20 4:27       0:36 2:11 0:50 0:43     0:36   0:44   0:26
28 Carrier - 92 Nosek - 75 Reaves 0:08 0:01 4:19 0:04       0:01 1:08 0:58     0:32 0:12       1:19
67 Pacioretty - 92 Nosek - 61 Stone 0:02 1:19   0:09       1:45 0:19   1:08 0:30   0:26 0:07      
26 Janmark - 10 Roy - 89 Tuch 0:24 0:12 0:32 0:21       0:43 0:43   0:08 1:06 0:29   0:08   0:23  
28 Carrier - 10 Roy - 55 Kolesar 0:34   0:27 0:48       0:34 0:27       0:09       0:39 0:06
67 Pacioretty - 10 Roy - 61 Stone - 89 Tuch         1:34     0:58               1:02    
7 Pietrangelo - 23 Martinez 1:13 5:58 4:02 1:56   0:56 1:16 4:08 7:17 0:24 2:24 0:21 0:34 1:28 2:04 0:30 0:19 1:02
3 McNabb - 27 Theodore 9:47 2:13 1:51 2:18   0:19   7:20 4:42 1:36 0:59 2:47 0:35 1:03 0:01 0:08 1:21 0:06
2 Whitecloud - 22 Holden 0:30 0:37 2:42 3:45       2:15 1:41 1:16 0:50 0:28 0:45 1:14 0:07 0:47 0:48 1:22
23 Martinez - 27 Theodore   0:37     1:15     3:11 0:12 0:47     0:59   0:11 0:07    
7 Pietrangelo         2:00     1:22   0:11     1:06     1:10    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 54.2% 54.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Anderson 10.7% 2.4% 8.3%  
Lehkonen-Suzuki 4.4% 4.4%    
Toffoli-Danault 4.2% 4.2%    
Byron-Danault 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 22.8% 21.5% 1.3%  
Totals   90.4% 9.6%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Caufield 53.1% 53.1%    
Caufield-Toffoli-Perry 9.2%   9.2%  
Toffoli 5.1% 0.5%   4.5%
Toffoli-Perry 3.8% 3.8%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 25.1% 23.4% 0.7% 1.0%
Totals   84.6% 9.9% 5.5%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Anderson 54.0% 54.0%    
Gallagher-Anderson 13.8% 3.1% 10.7%  
Byron-Danault 7.2% 7.2%    
Armia-Anderson 7.0% 7.0%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 14.0% 14.0%    
Totals   89.3% 10.7%  
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 61.2% 61.2%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi 15.6% 3.5% 12.1%  
Armia-Kotkaniemi 7.9% 7.9%    
Toffoli-Kotkaniemi 3.8% 3.8%    
Gallagher-Danault 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   87.9% 12.1%  
21 Staal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Armia-Perry 69.2% 69.2%    
Toffoli-Caufield 6.1% 6.1%    
Toffoli-Perry 4.1% 4.1%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.5% 3.5%    
Armia-Anderson 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 14.2% 14.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
22 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Suzuki 70.9% 70.9%    
Suzuki-Toffoli-Perry 12.2%   12.2%  
Lehkonen-Suzuki 4.9% 4.9%    
Toffoli-Staal 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 4.6% 4.6%    
Totals   87.8% 12.2%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Gallagher 46.8% 46.8%    
Lehkonen 14.8%     14.8%
Byron-Kotkaniemi 4.8% 4.8%    
Byron 4.6%     4.6%
Toffoli-Gallagher 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 25.4% 23.3% 1.2% 0.9%
Totals   78.5% 1.2% 20.3%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Staal-Perry 57.2% 57.2%    
Byron 8.8%     8.8%
Kotkaniemi-Anderson 7.0% 7.0%    
Toffoli-Suzuki 4.3% 4.3%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 19.4% 14.5%   4.9%
Totals   86.4%   13.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Anderson 55.3% 55.3%    
Armia 8.9%     8.9%
Danault-Kotkaniemi 7.4% 7.4%    
Danault 7.1%     7.1%
Danault-Gallagher 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 16.4% 16.4%    
Totals   84.0%   16.0%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 53.9% 53.9%    
Danault 17.0%     17.0%
Suzuki-Gallagher 4.3% 4.3%    
Suzuki-Caufield 4.2% 4.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 17.5% 14.2%   3.3%
Totals   79.7%   20.3%
73 Toffoli
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Caufield 54.3% 54.3%    
Suzuki-Caufield-Perry 9.4%   9.4%  
Suzuki 5.2% 0.5%   4.6%
Suzuki-Perry 3.9% 3.9%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 23.5% 21.5%   2.0%
Totals   84.0% 9.4% 6.7%
94 Perry
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Armia-Staal 57.1% 57.1%    
Suzuki-Caufield-Toffoli 13.5%   13.5%  
Toffoli-Suzuki 5.6% 5.6%    
Toffoli-Staal 3.3% 3.3%    
Armia-Suzuki 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 17.2% 15.4% 1.7%  
Totals   84.8% 15.2%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 61.1% 47.5%   13.6%
Edmundson 15.6% 15.6%    
Petry 10.0% 5.2% 4.7%  
Merrill 8.0% 8.0%    
Gustafsson 5.0% 4.2% 0.9%  
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   80.8% 5.6% 13.6%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 61.4% 47.8%   13.7%
Petry 13.2% 13.2%    
Merrill 12.9% 12.9%    
Edmundson 9.7% 5.9%   3.9%
Gustafsson 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   82.5%   17.5%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Edmundson 50.7% 50.7%    
Merrill 16.1% 13.5%   2.6%
Chiarot 13.5% 13.5%    
Weber 10.3% 5.4% 4.9%  
Gustafsson 8.3% 8.3%    
Others 1.1%   1.1%  
Totals   91.4% 6.0% 2.6%
28 Merrill
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 30.5% 25.5%   5.0%
Edmundson 25.1% 14.2%   10.9%
Chiarot 25.0% 25.0%    
Weber 15.6% 15.6%    
Gustafsson 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   84.1%   15.9%
32 Gustafsson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 34.2% 34.2%    
  26.1%   26.1%  
Weber 21.3% 17.7% 3.6%  
Chiarot 10.2% 10.2%    
Merrill 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   70.3% 29.7%  
44 Edmundson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 56.1% 56.1%    
Weber 17.7% 17.7%    
Merrill 14.7% 8.3%   6.4%
Chiarot 11.1% 6.7%   4.4%
Chiarot-Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   89.3%   10.7%

Back to main page