Game #02 - May 22, 2021 - Montreal 1 at Toronto 5
Game #02 - May 22, 2021
  Montreal   1   at     Toronto   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
94 Perry21 Staal17 Anderson
 5:36 5:36 0:00 0:00 E
73 Toffoli14 Suzuki40 Armia
 5:01 5:01 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 4:16 4:16 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 4:15 0:00 0:00 4:15 E
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi62 Lehkonen
 3:35 3:35 0:00 0:00 E
73 Toffoli14 Suzuki94 Perry
 2:56 2:56 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron24 Danault17 Anderson
 2:44 2:44 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:08 2:08 0:00 0:00 -1
90 Tatar21 Staal11 Gallagher
 1:57 1:57 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar15 Kotkaniemi11 Gallagher
 1:55 1:55 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia41 Byron
 1:51 0:00 0:00 1:51 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 1:40 1:40 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 73 Toffoli - 94 Perry 1:27 1:27 0:00 0:00 E
73 Toffoli14 Suzuki17 Anderson
 1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault41 Byron
 1:04 0:00 0:00 1:04 E
14 Suzuki73 Toffoli
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 17:22 14:17 2:00 1:05 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Edmundson26 Petry
 15:34 13:36 0:00 1:58 +1
77 Kulak  8 Chiarot
 8:22 8:22 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 7:45 6:15 0:00 1:30 E
28 Merrill  6 Weber
 7:31 7:31 0:00 0:00 -1
77 Kulak28 Merrill
 5:16 5:16 0:00 0:00 E
44 Edmundson  6 Weber
 4:20 0:24 0:00 3:56 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 2:31 1:33 0:17 0:41 E
44 Edmundson  8 Chiarot
 2:20 1:45 0:00 0:35 -1
28 Merrill26 Petry
 1:59 1:44 0:00 0:15 E
  6 Weber26 Petry
 1:34 1:34 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:48 0:45 1:43 0:20 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 94CP
21ES
17JA		 73TT
14NS
40JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 24PD
62AL		 41PB
15JK
62AL		 73TT
14NS
94CP		 41PB
24PD
17JA		 41PB
24PD
62AL		 44JE
26JP		 77BK
8BC		 8BC
6SW		 28JM
6SW		 77BK
28JM		 44JE
6SW		 8BC
26JP		 44JE
8BC
11 Hyman - 34 Matthews - 16 Marner 0:13 0:41 3:00   0:32 0:33 0:32 0:56 4:14 1:12 0:53 4:20 0:15 0:08 0:40 0:40
12 Galchenyuk - 71 Foligno - 88 Nylander 1:21 2:41 0:29   0:32 0:49 0:04   3:32 2:06 0:36 0:44 1:05   0:21 0:06
47 Engvall - 15 Kerfoot - 65 Mikheyev 0:45 1:03     1:52 1:00 0:42 0:15 1:13 2:43 1:30 0:24 1:10      
97 Thornton - 19 Spezza - 24 Simmonds 2:47   0:27 0:09 0:04 0:01   0:32 1:04 1:14 0:47 0:46 1:26   0:21 0:22
11 Hyman - 16 Marner - 34 Matthews - 97 Thornton       2:20         0:59   1:16     1:49   0:11
15 Kerfoot - 19 Spezza - 88 Nylander - 24 Simmonds       1:01         0:49   0:10     0:46 0:16  
44 Rielly - 78 Brodie 2:11 1:52 2:13   0:41 1:42 1:11 0:11 4:45 2:58 1:51 2:59 1:32 0:24 0:34 1:10
3 Holl - 8 Muzzin 0:59 2:21 1:25   0:33 1:03 0:39 0:48 5:12 2:26 1:55 1:53 0:43   1:11 0:29
22 Bogosian - 38 Sandin 1:16 0:36 0:23   1:50     0:31 1:21 2:21 0:26 1:53 0:42      
38 Sandin       2:29         1:09   1:16     2:10 0:09 0:16
44 Rielly       1:17         0:49   0:10     1:46 0:36 0:10
8 Muzzin - 22 Bogosian 0:08       0:03 0:03 0:42 0:32 0:25   0:51 0:06 1:36      
22 Bogosian - 78 Brodie 0:32               0:27 0:08 0:17   0:24   0:01  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 33.4% 33.4%    
Tatar-Staal 15.3% 15.3%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 15.0% 15.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Tatar-Perry 7.2%   7.2%  
Tatar-Suzuki 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 23.8% 23.8%    
Totals   92.8% 7.2%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Armia 27.5% 27.5%    
Toffoli-Perry 16.1% 16.1%    
Danault-Toffoli-Perry 8.0% 8.0%    
Toffoli-Anderson 6.7% 6.7%    
Toffoli 5.5%     5.5%
Others 36.2% 27.6% 4.4% 4.2%
Totals   85.9% 4.4% 9.7%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Lehkonen 27.9% 27.9%    
Tatar-Gallagher 14.9% 14.9%    
Lehkonen-Armia 13.0% 13.0%    
Gallagher-Tatar-Perry 7.1%   7.1%  
Anderson-Armia 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 31.2% 31.2%    
Totals   92.9% 7.1%  
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Perry-Staal 34.1% 34.1%    
Byron-Danault 16.6% 16.6%    
Toffoli-Suzuki 7.4% 7.4%    
Suzuki-Staal-Toffoli 4.9%   4.9%  
Kotkaniemi-Armia 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 32.4% 32.4%    
Totals   95.1% 4.9%  
21 Staal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Perry-Anderson 44.3% 44.3%    
Tatar-Gallagher 15.4% 15.4%    
Suzuki-Anderson-Toffoli 6.3%   6.3%  
Byron-Lehkonen 5.0% 5.0%    
Lehkonen-Armia 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 24.5% 24.5%    
Totals   93.7% 6.3%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 21.9% 21.9%    
Lehkonen 21.8%     21.8%
Byron-Anderson 14.0% 14.0%    
Byron-Lehkonen 10.9% 10.9%    
Suzuki-Toffoli-Perry 7.4% 7.4%    
Others 23.9% 15.3% 1.5% 7.1%
Totals   69.6% 1.5% 28.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Toffoli-Suzuki 38.7% 38.7%    
Byron 14.3%     14.3%
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 12.9% 12.9%    
Suzuki 5.9%     5.9%
Anderson-Kotkaniemi 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 22.4% 21.0%   1.4%
Totals   78.4%   21.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 26.1% 26.1%    
Danault-Anderson 19.9% 19.9%    
Danault-Lehkonen 15.5% 15.5%    
Armia 13.5%     13.5%
Danault 7.8%     7.8%
Others 17.2% 17.2%    
Totals   78.8%   21.2%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault 27.8%     27.8%
Byron-Kotkaniemi 23.4% 23.4%    
Byron-Danault 14.0% 14.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 10.9% 10.9%    
Toffoli-Suzuki 5.9% 5.9%    
Others 18.0% 16.1% 1.9%  
Totals   70.3% 1.9% 27.8%
73 Toffoli
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 30.2% 30.2%    
Suzuki-Perry 17.6% 17.6%    
Suzuki-Danault-Perry 8.7% 8.7%    
Suzuki-Anderson 7.3% 7.3%    
Suzuki 6.0%     6.0%
Others 30.2% 24.5% 4.8% 0.8%
Totals   88.4% 4.8% 6.8%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 37.3% 37.3%    
Staal-Gallagher 17.0% 17.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 16.7% 16.7%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Perry 8.0%   8.0%  
Suzuki-Gallagher 6.0% 6.0%    
Others 15.0% 15.0%    
Totals   92.0% 8.0%  
94 Perry
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Staal-Anderson 38.3% 38.3%    
Toffoli-Suzuki 20.0% 20.0%    
Suzuki-Danault-Toffoli 9.9% 9.9%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 6.3%   6.3%  
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Toffoli 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 21.8% 19.8% 1.9%  
Totals   91.8% 8.2%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 35.2% 28.4%   6.8%
Merrill 34.2% 34.2%    
Edmundson 19.7% 1.8%   17.9%
Petry 7.1% 7.1%    
  3.6%   3.6%  
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   71.7% 3.6% 24.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 38.6% 38.6%    
Weber 35.8% 28.8%   6.9%
Petry 11.6% 7.2% 1.3% 3.2%
Edmundson 10.8% 8.1%   2.7%
Merrill 3.2% 1.7%   1.5%
Totals   84.4% 1.3% 14.3%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Edmundson 69.0% 60.3%   8.7%
Chiarot 11.2% 6.9% 1.3% 3.0%
Merrill 8.8% 7.7%   1.1%
Weber 6.9% 6.9%    
  4.1%   4.1%  
Totals   81.8% 5.3% 12.9%
28 Merrill
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 48.6% 48.6%    
Kulak 34.1% 34.1%    
Petry 12.8% 11.2%   1.6%
Chiarot 4.5% 2.4%   2.2%
Totals   96.2%   3.8%
44 Edmundson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 68.9% 60.2%   8.7%
Weber 19.2% 1.8%   17.4%
Chiarot 10.3% 7.7%   2.6%
Kulak 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   71.3%   28.7%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 59.7% 59.7%    
Merrill 37.6% 37.6%    
Edmundson 2.5% 2.5%    
Weber 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page