Game #60 - February 14, 2020 - Montreal 1 at Pittsburgh 4
Game #60 - February 14, 2020
  Montreal   1   at     Pittsburgh   4

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
11:57 11:57 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin13 Domi21 Cousins
9:13 9:13 0:00 0:00 E
17 Kovalchuk14 Suzuki40 Armia
8:38 8:38 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson71 Evans
7:08 7:08 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 17 Kovalchuk - 40 Armia - 92 Drouin 3:29 0:48 2:41 0:00 -1
40 Armia44 Thompson
2:29 0:00 0:00 2:29 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
2:05 0:00 0:00 2:05 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 21 Cousins - 90 Tatar 1:38 0:07 1:31 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault71 Evans
1:14 1:14 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar13 Domi21 Cousins
1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar14 Suzuki11 Gallagher
1:02 0:39 0:23 0:00 -1
Others 10:05 8:40 0:09 1:16 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
77 Kulak26 Petry
14:38 14:38 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
14:30 14:07 0:23 0:00 -2
28 Scandella61 Ouellet
13:49 13:12 0:00 0:37 E
26 Petry
3:34 0:00 3:34 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
3:29 0:16 0:00 3:13 E
77 Kulak53 Mete
2:07 1:18 0:00 0:49 E
28 Scandella26 Petry
1:11 0:00 0:00 1:11 E
  8 Chiarot77 Kulak
1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete61 Ouellet
1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella77 Kulak
1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:31 2:44 0:47 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG
92JD
13MD
21NC
17IK
14NS
40JA
62AL
44NT
71JE
13MD
17IK
40JA
92JD
40JA
44NT
24PD
62AL
77BK
26JP
8BC
53VM
28MS
61XO
26JP 8BC
26JP
77BK
53VM
16 Zucker - 87 Crosby - 12 Simon 6:11 1:19 2:08 0:56       8:48 0:52 2:21     0:16
19 McCann - 71 Malkin - 17 Rust 3:26 2:20 3:02 1:01       0:40 5:52 3:18     0:07
13 Tanev - 53 Blueger - 46 Aston-Reese 1:22 4:18 1:15 1:20 0:48   0:01 1:10 4:07 4:12   0:07 0:41
37 Lafferty - 26 Agozzino - 72 Hornqvist 0:25 0:34 0:44 1:43       1:35 0:58 1:05   0:07  
71 Malkin - 87 Crosby - 17 Rust - 72 Hornqvist           1:40 0:04         1:10  
3 Johnson - 58 Letang 6:06 2:59 2:39 1:57 2:02     6:19 3:14 5:18 2:02 0:10  
4 Schultz - 28 Pettersson 2:53 2:52 2:44 1:41     0:10 4:52 4:15 2:04   0:25 0:09
2 Ruhwedel - 50 Riikola 1:28 2:01 2:16 1:44       1:48 3:03 2:38     0:14
2 Ruhwedel - 28 Pettersson 0:39 0:04 0:16   0:48   0:01 0:41 1:10 0:07 0:52 0:07 0:15
2 Ruhwedel - 3 Johnson 0:30 0:51   0:18 0:23     0:30   1:27 0:24   0:26
28 Pettersson - 58 Letang 0:08   0:21 0:34   0:12 0:19   0:21 0:42   0:15 0:56
4 Schultz - 50 Riikola 0:03 0:21 0:04 0:11         0:35 0:40     0:07

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 69.6% 69.6%    
Suzuki-Cousins-Tatar 9.5% 0.7% 8.8%  
Tatar-Suzuki 6.0% 3.8% 2.2%  
Kovalchuk-Danault 4.3% 4.3%    
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 7.0% 6.1% 0.9%  
Totals   88.1% 11.9%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Cousins 56.3% 56.3%    
Kovalchuk-Armia-Drouin 21.3% 4.9% 16.4%  
Tatar-Cousins 6.3% 6.3%    
Drouin-Kovalchuk 3.7% 3.7%    
Cousins-Kovalchuk 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 9.4% 8.4% 0.9%  
Totals   82.7% 17.3%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Armia 59.3% 59.3%    
Gallagher-Cousins-Tatar 11.2% 0.8% 10.4%  
Tatar-Gallagher 7.1% 4.5% 2.6%  
Kovalchuk-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Tatar-Armia 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 14.4% 11.7% 1.0% 1.7%
Totals   84.2% 14.1% 1.7%
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 54.8% 54.8%    
Domi-Armia-Drouin 22.1% 5.1% 17.0%  
Danault-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Drouin-Domi 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 10.7% 10.7%    
Totals   83.0% 17.0%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Domi 61.8% 61.8%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 10.9% 0.8% 10.2%  
Tatar-Domi 6.9% 6.9%    
Evans-Lehkonen 5.4% 5.4%    
Domi-Kovalchuk 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 11.5% 11.5%    
Totals   89.8% 10.2%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 68.7% 68.7%    
Lehkonen 12.0%     12.0%
Lehkonen-Evans 7.1% 7.1%    
Kovalchuk-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.8% 2.8%   3.0%
Totals   85.0%   15.0%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 52.6% 52.6%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Drouin 21.2% 4.9% 16.4%  
Thompson 15.1%     15.1%
Tatar-Suzuki 3.3% 3.3%    
Danault 2.1%     2.1%
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   66.4% 16.4% 17.3%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Evans 61.8% 61.8%    
Armia 21.5%     21.5%
Lehkonen 6.5% 0.7%   5.8%
Drouin-Cousins 3.9% 3.9%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   72.7%   27.3%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Evans 51.9% 51.9%    
Danault 15.2%     15.2%
Danault-Evans 9.0% 9.0%    
Cousins-Evans 5.8% 5.8%    
Thompson 5.5% 0.6%   4.9%
Others 12.6% 12.0%   0.6%
Totals   79.4%   20.6%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 67.8% 67.8%    
Lehkonen-Danault 11.7% 11.7%    
Cousins-Lehkonen 7.6% 7.6%    
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 3.5% 3.5%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 6.7% 6.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 72.5% 72.5%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Cousins 9.9% 0.7% 9.2%  
Domi-Cousins 6.3% 6.3%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 6.3% 3.9% 2.3%  
Suzuki-Armia 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 1.8% 0.9% 0.9%  
Totals   87.6% 12.4%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Cousins 63.5% 63.5%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Armia 24.0% 5.5% 18.5%  
Domi-Kovalchuk 4.1% 4.1%    
Thompson-Cousins 3.1% 3.1%    
Domi-Armia 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 3.0% 3.0%    
Totals   81.5% 18.5%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 72.1% 70.2% 1.9%  
Petry 17.3% 1.3%   16.0%
Kulak 5.5% 5.5%    
Scandella 4.3% 4.3%    
Ouellet 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   82.1% 1.9% 16.0%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 61.7% 61.7%    
  15.0%   15.0%  
Chiarot 14.7% 1.1%   13.6%
Scandella 5.0%     5.0%
Ouellet 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   66.4% 15.0% 18.6%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ouellet 79.0% 75.4%   3.5%
Petry 6.8%     6.8%
Kulak 5.9% 5.9%    
Chiarot 5.0% 5.0%    
Mete 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   89.7%   10.3%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 75.3% 73.3% 2.0%  
Kulak 11.0% 6.8%   4.2%
Ouellet 5.5% 5.5%    
  4.7% 0.6% 4.1%  
Scandella 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   89.7% 6.1% 4.2%
61 Ouellet
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 86.7% 82.8%   3.9%
Mete 6.6% 6.6%    
Petry 5.3% 5.3%    
Kulak 0.8% 0.8%    
Chiarot 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   96.1%   3.9%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 76.6% 76.6%    
Mete 11.1% 6.8%   4.3%
Chiarot 5.8% 5.8%    
Scandella 5.4% 5.4%    
Ouellet 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   95.7%   4.3%

Back to main page