Game #42 - January 4, 2020 - Pittsburgh 3 at Montreal 2 (OT)
Game #42 - January 4, 2020
  Pittsburgh   3   at     Montreal   2     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault21 Cousins
 11:38 11:38 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
 9:36 9:36 0:00 0:00 +1
25 Poehling15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
 7:16 7:16 0:00 0:00 -1
42 Vejdemo44 Thompson22 Weise
 4:15 4:15 0:00 0:00 -1
14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 25 Poehling - 90 Tatar 3:44 0:26 3:18 0:00 E
13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 21 Cousins - 43 Weal 3:13 0:01 3:12 0:00 E
13 Domi14 Suzuki
 2:07 2:07 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson22 Weise
 2:02 2:02 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki44 Thompson
 1:39 0:14 0:00 1:25 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:38 0:57 0:00 0:41 E
44 Thompson62 Lehkonen
 1:35 0:00 0:00 1:35 E
90 Tatar13 Domi21 Cousins
 1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki25 Poehling
 1:08 0:00 0:00 1:08 E
Others 10:48 9:01 0:39 1:08 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 15:11 13:15 0:04 1:52 -1
53 Mete26 Petry
 9:15 9:15 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella20 Fleury
 9:03 9:03 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 4:57 2:49 0:10 1:58 -1
26 Petry
 4:46 1:16 3:30 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot28 Scandella
 3:41 3:12 0:00 0:29 E
  6 Weber
 3:26 0:01 3:25 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
 2:02 2:02 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella26 Petry
 1:31 0:43 0:00 0:48 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot20 Fleury
 1:04 0:40 0:00 0:24 E
  8 Chiarot
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
Others 4:28 4:02 0:00 0:26 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
21NC		 62AL
13MD
14NS		 25RP
15JK
43JW		 42LV
44NT
22DW		 14NS
24PD
25RP
90TT		 13MD
15JK
21NC
43JW		 13MD
14NS		 62AL
44NT
22DW		 8BC
6SW		 53VM
26JP		 28MS
20CF		 8BC
26JP		 26JP 8BC
28MS		 6SW 53VM
6SW
13 Tanev - 53 Blueger - 46 Aston-Reese 0:06 3:03 4:40 0:01         0:50 2:30 4:45 0:35       0:11
12 Simon - 19 McCann - 72 Hornqvist 1:58 4:46 0:34 0:49         1:24 3:06 1:52 0:31   0:04   0:41
24 Kahun - 71 Malkin - 17 Rust 3:27 0:28 0:03 0:58         3:48 1:09 0:14 0:40        
13 Tanev - 53 Blueger         2:07 2:34 0:27           2:06   2:35  
18 Galchenyuk - 71 Malkin - 17 Rust 3:12 0:03   0:18       0:19 3:04 0:06 0:06     0:24    
19 McCann - 71 Malkin - 17 Rust - 72 Hornqvist 0:34               2:21     0:26   0:23    
36 Blandisi - 24 Kahun - 54 Di Pauli   0:03 1:12 1:17         1:18 0:43 0:33          
3 Johnson - 58 Letang 6:09 2:50 0:15 1:48 0:47 1:24   1:10 8:01 1:27 0:58 0:12 0:51 1:13 1:24 1:08
6 Marino - 28 Pettersson 2:15 4:30 2:28 1:07 0:50 0:39 0:17 0:11 1:38 5:35 3:38 0:30 0:45 0:15 0:51  
2 Ruhwedel - 50 Riikola 0:33 0:59 3:09 0:41       0:26 0:37 1:33 3:54 0:35 0:08 0:26   0:07
58 Letang 0:34               2:24     1:28 0:26 0:29    
50 Riikola - 58 Letang 0:41   0:02       0:31   0:27     1:02   1:03    
2 Ruhwedel - 3 Johnson 0:18 0:31   0:17 0:58         0:15 0:21 0:37 1:03      
6 Marino - 50 Riikola 0:15     0:22         0:37     0:18 0:11     0:38

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 49.0% 49.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Cousins-Weal 16.4% 0.1% 16.3%  
Suzuki 10.8% 10.8%    
Tatar-Cousins 6.0% 6.0%    
Vejdemo-Suzuki 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 13.3% 11.7% 1.0% 0.5%
Totals   82.1% 17.3% 0.5%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 43.9% 43.9%    
Danault-Poehling-Tatar 17.1% 2.0% 15.1%  
Domi 9.7% 9.7%    
Thompson 7.5% 1.1%   6.5%
Poehling 5.2%     5.2%
Others 16.6% 14.4% 1.8% 0.5%
Totals   71.0% 16.8% 12.1%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Weal 53.3% 53.3%    
Domi-Cousins-Weal 23.6% 0.1% 23.5%  
Poehling-Cousins 4.6% 4.2% 0.5%  
Tatar-Weal 4.5% 4.5%    
Poehling-Suzuki 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 10.9% 8.7% 2.2%  
Totals   73.8% 26.2%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 65.6% 65.6%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Weal 18.1% 0.1% 18.0%  
Tatar-Domi 6.6% 6.6%    
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.2% 0.4%  
Thompson 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 4.3% 4.3%    
Totals   81.6% 18.4%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Vejdemo-Thompson 59.0% 59.0%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 28.2% 28.2%    
Tatar-Thompson 5.3% 5.3%    
Tatar-Danault 2.5% 2.5%    
Vejdemo-Kotkaniemi 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Cousins 57.1% 57.1%    
Suzuki-Poehling-Tatar 18.3% 2.1% 16.2%  
Lehkonen 8.0% 4.7%   3.4%
  2.7%     2.7%
Tatar 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 11.3% 8.0% 1.4% 1.9%
Totals   74.5% 17.6% 7.9%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 51.5% 51.5%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 26.5% 3.1% 23.4%  
Suzuki 8.0%     8.0%
Kotkaniemi-Cousins 4.5% 4.0% 0.5%  
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 6.5% 4.4% 2.1%  
Totals   66.0% 26.0% 8.0%
42 Vejdemo
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 62.2% 62.2%    
Domi-Suzuki 13.2% 13.2%    
Domi-Weal 8.8% 8.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 5.1% 5.1%    
Thompson-Suzuki 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 6.6% 4.9% 1.7%  
Totals   98.3% 1.7%  
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 57.1% 57.1%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Cousins 25.3% 0.1% 25.2%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 4.8% 4.8%    
Vejdemo-Domi 4.7% 4.7%    
Vejdemo-Kotkaniemi 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 5.2% 2.9% 2.4%  
Totals   72.5% 27.5%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Vejdemo-Weise 34.8% 34.8%    
Lehkonen-Weise 16.7% 16.7%    
Suzuki 13.5% 1.9%   11.6%
Lehkonen 13.0%     13.0%
Danault 3.1%     3.1%
Others 18.9% 18.9%    
Totals   72.3%   27.7%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 62.7% 62.7%    
Thompson-Weise 13.3% 13.3%    
Danault 10.7% 6.2%   4.5%
Thompson 10.3%     10.3%
Domi-Cousins 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 1.6% 1.0%   0.7%
Totals   84.5%   15.5%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Cousins 57.8% 57.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Poehling 18.5% 2.2% 16.4%  
Domi-Cousins 5.8% 5.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 3.1% 3.1%    
Domi-Suzuki 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 11.9% 10.5% 1.4%  
Totals   82.2% 17.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 64.7% 56.5% 0.3% 8.0%
  14.6% 0.1% 14.6%  
Mete 8.7% 8.7%    
Petry 5.8% 5.8%    
Scandella 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   77.2% 14.9% 8.0%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 57.0% 49.7% 0.3% 7.0%
Petry 18.6% 10.6% 0.6% 7.4%
Scandella 13.8% 12.0%   1.8%
Fleury 4.0% 2.5%   1.5%
  3.9% 3.9%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   81.4% 0.9% 17.7%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 73.1% 73.1%    
Chiarot 8.6% 5.4%   3.2%
Mete 7.7% 7.7%    
Petry 7.0% 4.3%   2.7%
Weber 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   94.1%   5.9%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 40.2% 40.2%    
Chiarot 21.5% 12.3% 0.7% 8.6%
  20.7% 5.5% 15.2%  
Scandella 6.6% 3.1%   3.5%
Weber 5.9% 5.9%    
Others 4.9% 3.5%   1.5%
Totals   70.6% 16.0% 13.5%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 57.8% 57.8%    
Chiarot 23.5% 20.4%   3.1%
Petry 9.7% 4.6%   5.1%
Weber 5.0% 5.0%    
  2.3% 2.3%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   91.8%   8.2%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 71.4% 71.4%    
Weber 15.7% 15.7%    
Fleury 7.3% 7.3%    
Chiarot 3.7% 3.7%    
Scandella 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page