Game #26 - November 30, 2019 - Philadelphia 4 at Montreal 3 (OT)
Game #26 - November 30, 2019
  Philadelphia   4   at     Montreal   3     (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
11:03 11:03 0:00 0:00 +1
21 Cousins15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
9:07 9:07 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
8:04 8:04 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon44 Thompson43 Weal
4:37 4:23 0:14 0:00 E
21 Cousins13 Domi14 Suzuki
3:06 3:06 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 21 Cousins - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 2:55 0:06 2:49 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
2:26 2:26 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson43 Weal
2:04 2:04 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
1:44 0:00 0:00 1:44 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
1:38 0:00 0:00 1:38 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson40 Armia
1:15 1:15 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 15 Kotkaniemi - 90 Tatar 1:08 0:00 1:08 0:00 E
90 Tatar15 Kotkaniemi11 Gallagher
1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 -1
Others 10:16 9:38 0:00 0:38 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
10:58 10:06 0:00 0:52 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
7:12 4:46 0:00 2:26 +1
53 Mete  6 Weber
7:10 7:10 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Chiarot20 Fleury
6:09 6:09 0:00 0:00 E
51 Olofsson20 Fleury
6:03 6:03 0:00 0:00 -1
26 Petry  6 Weber
5:27 5:27 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry20 Fleury
3:46 3:11 0:00 0:35 -1
  6 Weber
2:50 0:06 2:44 0:00 E
20 Fleury  6 Weber
2:45 2:38 0:00 0:07 E
51 Olofsson  8 Chiarot
2:20 2:20 0:00 0:00 E
51 Olofsson  6 Weber
2:08 2:08 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
1:44 0:31 1:13 0:00 -1
Others 1:59 1:45 0:14 0:00 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG
21NC
15JK
40JA
62AL
13MD
14NS
54CH
44NT
43JW
21NC
13MD
14NS
13MD
21NC
40JA
43JW
62AL
15JK
40JA
62AL
44NT
43JW
8BC
26JP
8BC
6SW
53VM
6SW
8BC
20CF
51GO
20CF
26JP
6SW
26JP
20CF
6SW 20CF
6SW
51GO
8BC
51GO
6SW
23 Lindblom - 14 Couturier - 93 Voracek 6:14 1:27 0:06 0:36 0:14     0:45 5:26 1:04 0:35 0:33 0:56 3:00 0:29   1:17 0:11  
21 Laughton - 13 Hayes - 49 Farabee 1:03 3:45 1:50   1:02   0:06   0:58 0:52 1:19 0:39 1:43 0:40 1:04   0:13 0:04 2:05
11 Konecny - 28 Giroux - 48 Frost 1:07 0:19 3:15 0:33       0:32 1:20 0:42 3:21   0:04 0:47     0:28    
25 Van Riemsdyk - 12 Raffl - 18 Pitlick 0:29 0:29 1:27 1:40       0:29 0:29 0:18 0:37 1:31 2:47   0:03        
12 Raffl - 28 Giroux - 11 Konecny 0:58   0:43 0:15 0:31   1:50 0:01 0:57 1:24   0:23   0:16 0:32   0:16 1:14  
25 Van Riemsdyk - 48 Frost - 18 Pitlick   0:34   0:19 0:33           0:13 1:17     0:33        
9 Provorov - 15 Niskanen 5:48 3:26 2:29 1:01 1:46 1:20 0:36 0:32 4:48 1:15 2:44 1:47 1:59 0:26 1:23 1:15 1:17 2:11 0:37
6 Sanheim - 61 Braun 2:52 3:48 1:39 1:09 0:22 0:25 0:15 1:02 1:30 1:29 2:00 1:43 2:31 3:02 1:05 0:25 0:42   0:15
5 Myers - 53 Gostisbehere 0:53 1:29 2:47 1:26 0:10   0:58 0:30 1:37 2:14 1:38 1:24 1:33 1:27 0:26     0:09 0:26
5 Myers - 9 Provorov 0:18 0:19 0:04   0:20   0:37   1:01   0:07 0:17             0:50
9 Provorov                   1:42                  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 73.7% 73.7%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 7.6%   7.6%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 7.6% 7.6%    
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.6%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 5.1% 5.0%   0.1%
Totals   92.3% 7.6% 0.1%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 48.5% 48.5%    
Cousins-Suzuki 18.7% 18.7%    
Cousins-Armia-Weal 17.6% 0.6% 17.0%  
Armia 3.1% 3.1%    
Lehkonen-Armia 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 9.4% 9.4%    
Totals   83.0% 17.0%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 56.9% 56.9%    
Cousins-Domi 21.9% 21.9%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 8.0%   8.0%  
Lehkonen-Danault 3.6% 3.6%    
Tatar-Gallagher 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 6.8% 6.8%    
Totals   92.0% 8.0%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Armia 57.7% 57.7%    
Lehkonen-Armia 15.4% 15.4%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 7.2%   7.2%  
Tatar-Gallagher 7.2% 7.2%    
Hudon-Weal 5.9% 5.9%    
Others 6.6% 6.6%    
Totals   92.8% 7.2%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 50.7% 50.7%    
Domi-Suzuki 17.2% 17.2%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 16.2% 0.6% 15.7%  
Thompson-Armia 7.0% 7.0%    
Danault-Armia 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   84.3% 15.7%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 65.0% 65.0%    
Lehkonen 10.2%     10.2%
Cousins-Armia 4.6% 4.6%    
Tatar-Armia 4.4% 4.4%    
Hudon-Weal 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 12.6% 10.6%   2.1%
Totals   87.7%   12.3%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 41.3% 41.3%    
Domi-Cousins-Weal 13.2% 0.5% 12.8%  
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 11.0% 11.0%    
Thompson 7.4%     7.4%
Cousins-Thompson 5.7% 5.7%    
Others 21.3% 20.0%   1.4%
Totals   78.5% 12.8% 8.8%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Thompson 40.1% 38.1% 2.0%  
Domi-Cousins-Armia 25.4% 0.9% 24.5%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 18.0% 18.0%    
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 8.1% 8.1%    
Hudon-Danault 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 3.8% 3.8%    
Totals   73.5% 26.5%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Weal 39.6% 37.6% 2.0%  
Lehkonen-Weal 17.7% 17.7%    
Armia 14.0%     14.0%
Cousins-Armia 10.7% 10.7%    
Hudon-Armia 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 13.9% 11.1%   2.7%
Totals   81.3% 2.0% 16.7%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 63.2% 60.0% 3.2%  
Kotkaniemi-Weal 12.8% 12.8%    
Danault-Weal 7.3% 7.3%    
Thompson-Armia 6.6% 6.6%    
Domi-Suzuki 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 6.8% 6.8%    
Totals   96.8% 3.2%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 47.5% 47.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 14.3% 14.3%    
Thompson-Weal 12.2% 12.2%    
Danault 10.2%     10.2%
Danault-Suzuki 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 12.8% 11.1%   1.7%
Totals   88.1%   11.9%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 73.6% 73.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 7.5%   7.5%  
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 7.5% 7.5%    
Danault-Armia 5.0% 5.0%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.8% 3.8%    
Totals   92.5% 7.5%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 26.2% 17.3%   8.8%
Mete 26.0% 26.0%    
Petry 19.8% 19.8%    
  10.3% 0.4% 9.9%  
Fleury 10.0% 9.6%   0.4%
Others 7.7% 7.7%    
Totals   80.8% 9.9% 9.3%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 40.3% 37.2%   3.2%
Weber 26.5% 17.5%   9.0%
Fleury 22.6% 22.6%    
Olofsson 8.6% 8.6%    
Mete 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   87.9%   12.1%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 32.4% 32.4%    
Olofsson 31.8% 31.8%    
Petry 19.8% 16.8%   3.1%
Weber 14.5% 13.9%   0.6%
Mete 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   96.3%   3.7%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 47.5% 43.8%   3.8%
Weber 23.6% 23.6%    
Fleury 16.3% 13.8%   2.5%
  7.5% 2.2% 5.3%  
Olofsson 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 1.8% 0.8% 1.0%  
Totals   87.4% 6.3% 6.3%
51 Olofsson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 53.7% 53.7%    
Chiarot 20.7% 20.7%    
Weber 18.9% 18.9%    
Petry 6.7% 6.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 85.3% 85.3%    
Chiarot 6.3% 6.3%    
Petry 5.0% 2.2% 2.8%  
Fleury 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   97.2% 2.8%  

Back to main page