Game #22 - November 20, 2019 - Ottawa 2 at Montreal 1 (OT)
Game #22 - November 20, 2019
  Ottawa   2   at     Montreal   1     (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Domi14 Suzuki40 Armia
13:38 8:55 4:43 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
12:52 8:15 4:37 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
10:50 7:00 3:50 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson54 Hudon
7:36 5:28 2:08 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
1:55 0:39 0:00 1:16 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
1:53 1:08 0:00 0:45 E
44 Thompson62 Lehkonen
1:24 0:20 0:00 1:04 E
13 Domi14 Suzuki43 Weal
1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault40 Armia
1:01 0:06 0:00 0:55 E
Others 8:25 4:08 4:17 0:00 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
24:46 15:05 7:34 2:07 E
53 Mete26 Petry
17:50 12:28 5:22 0:00 E
17 Kulak20 Fleury
9:37 7:20 2:17 0:00 -1
26 Petry20 Fleury
3:07 0:35 0:39 1:53 E
26 Petry
1:22 0:00 1:22 0:00 -1
Others 3:56 1:35 2:21 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13MD
14NS
40JA
90TT
24PD
11BG
62AL
15JK
43JW
21NC
44NT
54CH
8BC
6SW
53VM
26JP
17BK
20CF
26JP
20CF
7 Tkachuk - 21 Brown - 10 Duclair 2:24 0:38 2:05 2:38 2:54 3:58 1:10  
13 Paul - 44 Pageau - 28 Brown 0:59 3:51 1:42 0:04 4:50 1:17 0:23 0:01
63 Ennis - 36 White - 78 Chlapik 2:44 0:59   1:07 2:02 1:12 0:57 0:38
13 Paul - 71 Tierney - 28 Brown 0:05 2:29 1:22   1:40 2:14 0:33  
78 Chlapik - 71 Tierney - 14 Veronneau 0:24 0:12 0:43 1:15 0:30 0:29 2:23  
36 White - 71 Tierney - 63 Ennis 1:40 0:23 0:27 0:30 0:05 1:56 0:55  
7 Tkachuk - 44 Pageau - 10 Duclair 0:30 1:19     2:13 0:03    
7 Tkachuk - 71 Tierney - 10 Duclair 0:21 0:36 0:43 0:12 0:35 1:13 0:16  
2 Demelo - 72 Chabot 4:08 2:31 5:08 3:19 5:47 7:10 3:40 0:25
22 Zaitsev - 74 Borowiecki 4:45 4:28 3:27 2:42 6:48 6:57 2:32 0:01
29 Goloubef - 81 Hainsey 2:59 4:32 1:53 1:07 5:27 2:00 3:04  
2 Demelo         1:34     1:04
72 Chabot         1:31     0:28

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 78.5% 50.3% 28.2%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 4.8% 4.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 4.5%   4.5%  
Danault 2.4%   2.4%  
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 2.4%   2.4%  
Others 7.4% 3.5% 4.0%  
Totals   58.5% 41.5%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 82.5% 53.9% 28.5%  
Suzuki-Weal 6.5% 6.5%    
Armia-Weal-Hudon 5.0%   5.0%  
Suzuki-Gallagher 1.5%   1.5%  
Danault-Armia 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.1% 1.9% 1.2%  
Totals   63.7% 36.3%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 79.3% 51.8% 27.4%  
Domi-Weal 6.2% 6.2%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 4.3%   4.3%  
Armia 2.4% 0.7% 1.7%  
Lehkonen-Weal 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.6% 0.7% 4.9%  
Totals   61.6% 38.4%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weal 77.0% 49.8% 27.3%  
Tatar-Gallagher 5.6% 5.6%    
Lehkonen-Armia 4.9% 4.9%    
Tatar-Weal 3.7% 3.7%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 2.8%   2.8%  
Others 6.0% 4.6% 1.4%  
Totals   68.5% 31.5%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Hudon 92.5% 66.5% 26.0%  
Kotkaniemi-Hudon 4.7% 4.7%    
Suzuki-Hudon 2.2% 1.4% 0.8%  
Danault-Hudon 0.6%   0.6%  
Totals   72.6% 27.4%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 72.4% 46.4% 26.0%  
Lehkonen 10.8% 3.7%   7.1%
Armia 5.7% 0.6%   5.2%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 4.1%   4.1%  
Gallagher 2.3%   2.3%  
Others 4.7% 3.4% 1.3%  
Totals   54.0% 33.7% 12.3%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 71.7% 46.9% 24.8%  
Thompson 9.9% 6.0%   3.9%
Danault 5.3% 0.5%   4.8%
Domi-Weal-Hudon 4.4%   4.4%  
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 5.1% 2.5% 2.5%  
Totals   59.5% 31.7% 8.8%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 75.8% 49.0% 26.8%  
Domi-Suzuki 7.5% 7.5%    
Domi-Armia-Hudon 5.8%   5.8%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.6%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 4.6% 1.5% 3.0%  
Totals   64.3% 35.7%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Hudon 66.1% 47.5% 18.6%  
Armia 16.4% 9.9%   6.5%
Lehkonen 12.2% 2.9%   9.3%
Hudon-Weal 2.9%   2.9%  
Hudon-Gallagher 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   62.8% 21.4% 15.8%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 76.1% 54.8% 21.4%  
Domi-Armia-Weal 8.3%   8.3%  
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 3.8% 3.8%    
Thompson-Weal 3.3%   3.3%  
Danault-Gallagher 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 6.0% 4.8% 1.2%  
Totals   65.8% 34.2%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 68.6% 44.4% 24.3%  
Danault 12.1% 4.1%   8.0%
Thompson 8.9% 2.1%   6.8%
Kotkaniemi-Armia 4.3% 4.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 2.5%   2.5%  
Others 3.5% 2.4% 1.1%  
Totals   57.3% 27.9% 14.8%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 83.3% 53.4% 29.9%  
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 5.1% 5.1%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 4.7%   4.7%  
Kotkaniemi-Weal 3.3% 3.3%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 1.7%   1.7%  
Others 1.8%   1.8%  
Totals   61.8% 38.2%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 92.9% 56.6% 28.4% 7.9%
  3.1%   3.1%  
Kulak 1.8% 1.8%    
Chiarot-Kulak 1.1%   1.1%  
Petry 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   59.4% 32.6% 7.9%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 94.5% 57.5% 28.9% 8.1%
Mete 2.2%   2.2%  
Kulak 1.1% 0.8% 0.4%  
Kulak-Weber 1.1%   1.1%  
Petry 1.0% 0.6% 0.4%  
Totals   58.9% 33.0% 8.1%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 85.6% 65.3% 20.3%  
Weber 4.2% 4.2%    
Chiarot 2.7% 1.8% 0.9%  
Chiarot-Weber 2.7%   2.7%  
Petry 2.5% 0.6% 1.9%  
Others 2.4% 0.4% 1.9%  
Totals   72.3% 27.7%  
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 73.6% 56.1% 17.5%  
Petry 23.9% 4.5% 5.0% 14.4%
Mete-Petry 2.6% 2.6%    
Totals   63.1% 22.4% 14.4%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 76.2% 53.2% 22.9%  
Fleury 13.3% 2.5% 2.8% 8.0%
  5.8%   5.8%  
Mete-Fleury 1.4% 1.4%    
Kulak 1.2% 0.3% 0.9%  
Others 2.1% 1.6% 0.4%  
Totals   59.1% 32.9% 8.0%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 93.4% 65.3% 28.1%  
Chiarot 3.1%   3.1%  
Petry-Fleury 1.7% 1.7%    
Kulak 1.4% 0.3% 1.1%  
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   67.7% 32.3%  

Back to main page