Game #07 - October 17, 2019 - Minnesota 0 at Montreal 4
Game #07 - October 17, 2019
  Minnesota   0   at     Montreal   4

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
9:25 9:25 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson14 Suzuki
8:20 8:12 0:00 0:08 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
8:15 8:15 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen13 Domi41 Byron
6:33 6:33 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
2:53 0:00 0:00 2:53 E
13 Domi - 14 Suzuki - 40 Armia - 90 Tatar 2:29 0:05 2:24 0:00 +1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
2:19 0:27 0:00 1:52 E
41 Byron62 Lehkonen
1:30 0:00 0:00 1:30 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson41 Byron
1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault40 Armia
1:13 0:05 0:00 1:08 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson41 Byron
1:13 0:46 0:27 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 15 Kotkaniemi - 21 Cousins - 92 Drouin 1:12 0:00 1:12 0:00 E
Others 13:25 7:35 4:17 1:33 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot20 Fleury
11:46 11:46 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
11:21 10:44 0:00 0:37 +1
17 Kulak26 Petry
8:27 8:13 0:00 0:14 +1
26 Petry
4:03 0:05 3:50 0:08 +1
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
3:49 2:24 0:00 1:25 E
  6 Weber
3:20 0:00 3:20 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
3:17 2:19 0:27 0:31 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
3:15 0:10 0:26 2:39 E
17 Kulak20 Fleury
2:51 2:51 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
2:20 0:28 0:00 1:52 E
53 Mete26 Petry
1:39 0:28 0:00 1:11 E
26 Petry20 Fleury
1:24 1:11 0:13 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot17 Kulak
1:22 1:12 0:04 0:06 E
Others 1:06 0:45 0:00 0:21 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
15JK
40JA
21NC
44NT
14NS
90TT
24PD
11BG
62AL
13MD
41PB
40JA
44NT
13MD
14NS
40JA
90TT
24PD
62AL
8BC
20CF
53VM
6SW
17BK
26JP
26JP 8BC
53VM
6SW 8BC
26JP
26JP
6SW
17BK
20CF
8BC
6SW
11 Parise - 12 Staal - 16 Zucker 0:10 1:32 2:58 1:01       0:25 4:29 1:07 0:08     0:55   0:04  
17 Foligno - 18 Greenway - 19 Kunin 2:29   0:02 1:46       2:28 0:38 0:02   1:06       0:54  
11 Parise - 12 Staal - 22 Fiala     0:07   1:30   0:45 0:38 0:02 0:14   0:41   0:29 0:48   1:20
17 Foligno - 14 Eriksson Ek - 19 Kunin 1:44 0:13   1:15       2:40 0:10 1:00           0:33 0:03
16 Zucker - 9 Koivu - 6 Donato         0:52   0:43         0:40     1:00   0:32
11 Parise - 9 Koivu - 16 Zucker 0:50   2:20           2:13 0:36             0:21
18 Greenway - 6 Donato - 26 Mayhew 0:26 1:02 0:40         0:26 1:04 0:43       0:17      
17 Foligno - 14 Eriksson Ek           0:33         1:03   1:20        
20 Suter - 46 Spurgeon 1:52 2:42 2:32 3:20 0:14 0:52 0:24 2:30 3:50 3:39 1:34 1:24 0:36 1:10 1:04 0:04 0:09
24 Dumba - 25 Brodin 1:55 3:30 4:34 0:36 0:04 0:33 0:27 1:41 4:57 2:22 1:21   1:33 0:11   1:23 0:12
55 Seeler - 77 Hunt 2:43 1:25 0:14 2:27   0:37   6:11 0:54 0:34 0:38 0:13   0:56   0:22 0:03
20 Suter - 24 Dumba     0:07   1:34   0:45     0:16   0:24   0:39 0:48   1:20
25 Brodin - 55 Seeler 2:16   0:20         0:40 0:30 1:02   0:32       0:54  
46 Spurgeon - 77 Hunt 0:10       0:48   0:43         0:40     1:00 0:08 0:36
24 Dumba - 77 Hunt 0:29 0:31 0:07         0:08 0:58 0:03 0:08 0:15   0:21      

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 57.5% 57.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Cousins-Drouin 8.4%   8.4%  
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Drouin 5.8%   5.8%  
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 5.2%   5.2%  
Tatar-Domi 5.1% 4.6% 0.5%  
Others 18.0% 10.3% 5.8% 1.9%
Totals   72.5% 25.7% 1.9%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Byron 47.1% 47.1%    
Suzuki-Armia-Tatar 17.8% 0.6% 17.2%  
Drouin-Armia 5.7% 4.1% 1.7%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 5.4%   5.4%  
Tatar-Gallagher 5.3% 4.8% 0.5%  
Others 18.7% 12.9% 5.5% 0.2%
Totals   69.5% 30.3% 0.2%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 56.2% 55.3%   0.9%
Domi-Armia-Tatar 16.8% 0.6% 16.2%  
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar 5.1%   5.1%  
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 4.0%   4.0%  
Cousins 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 13.8% 8.0% 5.5% 0.3%
Totals   67.9% 30.8% 1.2%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 66.3% 66.3%    
Gallagher-Cousins-Drouin 8.5%   8.5%  
Gallagher-Danault-Drouin 5.9%   5.9%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 4.2%   4.2%  
Cousins-Danault-Drouin 3.6%   3.6%  
Others 11.5% 7.9% 3.1% 0.6%
Totals   74.2% 25.2% 0.6%
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Suzuki 62.6% 61.6%   1.0%
Thompson-Byron 9.1% 9.1%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 9.0%   9.0%  
Suzuki 4.5% 4.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Drouin 3.9%   3.9%  
Others 10.9% 4.9% 6.0%  
Totals   80.1% 18.9% 1.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 52.6% 52.6%    
Lehkonen 14.8% 2.9%   11.9%
Armia 7.8% 0.5%   7.2%
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 5.3%   5.3%  
Byron 4.0%     4.0%
Others 15.5% 11.3% 3.3% 1.0%
Totals   67.3% 8.6% 24.1%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 51.6% 51.6%    
Thompson 15.8%     15.8%
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 13.6% 0.5% 13.2%  
Danault 6.7% 0.5%   6.2%
Drouin-Domi 4.4% 3.1% 1.3%  
Others 7.9% 4.5% 3.5%  
Totals   60.1% 17.9% 22.0%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 46.6% 46.6%    
Lehkonen 10.7%     10.7%
Lehkonen-Thompson 8.7% 5.5% 3.2%  
Cousins-Thompson 8.7% 8.7%    
Danault 4.5%     4.5%
Others 20.9% 16.0% 0.6% 4.3%
Totals   76.7% 3.8% 19.5%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Suzuki 54.8% 53.9%   0.9%
Armia 19.0%     19.0%
Cousins-Byron 8.0% 8.0%    
Lehkonen-Byron 8.0% 5.0% 3.0%  
Byron 3.9%     3.9%
Others 6.3% 4.5% 1.4% 0.3%
Totals   71.5% 4.4% 24.1%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Byron 47.5% 47.5%    
Danault 16.8% 3.3%   13.5%
Byron 10.9%     10.9%
Thompson-Byron 8.8% 5.6% 3.3%  
Danault-Byron 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 11.6% 11.6%    
Totals   72.3% 3.3% 24.4%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 57.2% 57.2%    
Domi-Suzuki-Armia 17.2% 0.6% 16.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Suzuki 5.2%   5.2%  
Domi-Gallagher 5.1% 4.6% 0.5%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 4.2%   4.2%  
Others 11.2% 9.4% 1.8%  
Totals   71.7% 28.3%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 66.1% 66.1%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Cousins 8.4%   8.4%  
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Danault 5.8%   5.8%  
Domi-Armia 5.6% 4.0% 1.6%  
Kotkaniemi-Cousins-Danault 3.6%   3.6%  
Others 10.4% 7.1% 3.3%  
Totals   77.2% 22.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 54.7% 51.7%   3.0%
  16.1%   16.1%  
Petry 15.7% 0.8% 2.1% 12.8%
Chiarot 11.2% 2.2%   9.0%
Kulak 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   57.1% 18.2% 24.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 51.9% 51.9%    
Mete 16.9% 10.6%   6.3%
Petry 14.5% 10.2% 2.0% 2.3%
Weber 10.3% 2.1%   8.2%
Kulak 6.0% 5.3% 0.3% 0.4%
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   80.5% 2.3% 17.2%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 63.4% 61.6%   1.8%
Fleury 21.4% 21.4%    
Chiarot 10.2% 9.0% 0.5% 0.8%
Weber 3.0% 3.0%    
Petry-Fleury 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   97.0% 0.5% 2.5%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 70.7% 70.7%    
Kulak 17.1% 17.1%    
Petry 8.4% 7.1% 1.3%  
Mete 2.1%     2.1%
Kulak-Petry 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   96.6% 1.3% 2.1%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 37.7% 36.6%   1.0%
  18.1% 0.4% 17.1% 0.6%
Chiarot 14.6% 10.3% 2.0% 2.3%
Weber 14.5% 0.7% 1.9% 11.8%
Mete 7.4% 2.1%   5.3%
Others 7.8% 6.8% 1.0%  
Totals   57.0% 22.0% 21.0%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 66.1% 62.5%   3.6%
Chiarot 22.2% 14.0%   8.3%
Petry 9.6% 2.7%   6.9%
Fleury 2.0%     2.0%
Totals   79.2%   20.8%

Back to main page