Game #08 - July 28, 2020 - Toronto 4 at Montreal 2
Game #08 - July 28, 2020
  Toronto   4   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
43 Weal13 Domi22 Weise
 10:26 9:40 0:46 0:00 E
92 Drouin14 Suzuki40 Armia
 8:52 8:52 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 7:31 7:31 0:00 0:00 -2
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi62 Lehkonen
 6:32 6:32 0:00 0:00 +1
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 90 Tatar - 92 Drouin 6:02 0:11 5:51 0:00 -2
13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 4:50 0:20 4:30 0:00 E
24 Danault40 Armia
 2:21 0:01 0:12 2:08 E
41 Byron24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:25 1:20 0:05 0:00 E
40 Armia41 Byron
 1:11 0:00 0:00 1:11 E
Others 10:50 6:38 1:32 2:40 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 11:30 9:02 0:15 2:13 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
 7:40 7:40 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 7:21 1:11 6:10 0:00 -2
61 Ouellet53 Mete
 6:49 5:19 0:39 0:51 E
26 Petry
 5:18 0:12 5:06 0:00 E
61 Ouellet26 Petry
 2:56 2:01 0:00 0:55 E
61 Ouellet20 Fleury
 2:50 2:50 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak  6 Weber
 2:37 2:24 0:00 0:13 E
53 Mete20 Fleury
 2:11 2:11 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 1:25 1:12 0:13 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot77 Kulak
 1:24 1:24 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:13 0:06 0:04 1:03 +1
77 Kulak20 Fleury
 1:12 1:12 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
20 Fleury  6 Weber
 1:01 1:01 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:29 2:16 0:29 0:44 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 43JW
13MD
22DW		 92JD
14NS
40JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 41PB
15JK
62AL		 11BG
14NS
90TT
92JD		 13MD
15JK
40JA
43JW		 24PD
40JA		 8BC
6SW		 77BK
26JP		 6SW 61XO
53VM		 26JP 61XO
26JP		 61XO
20CF		 77BK
6SW		 53VM
20CF
11 Hyman - 34 Matthews - 88 Nylander   2:51 1:17 2:57       3:01 3:33 0:03 0:01   0:07   0:05  
16 Marner - 91 Tavares - 65 Mikheyev 1:05 2:18 2:43 0:46     0:09 2:56 1:00         0:48 0:52 0:33
89 Robertson - 15 Kerfoot - 24 Kapanen 2:49 1:20 0:23 1:55       0:38 0:20   3:15   0:18 0:19 0:39 0:23
11 Hyman - 16 Marner 0:16       2:39 1:01       3:02   1:23        
15 Kerfoot - 24 Kapanen 0:39       2:54 0:23       2:40 0:39 0:37        
73 Clifford - 19 Spezza - 33 Gauthier 1:30 1:02 0:54 0:04         1:09   0:54         0:53
16 Marner - 34 Matthews - 88 Nylander - 91 Tavares             0:41 1:26     0:37          
34 Matthews - 91 Tavares - 88 Nylander 1:49             0:31         0:18 1:05    
47 Engvall - 19 Spezza - 73 Clifford 1:24   0:38           0:28       0:59 0:37    
3 Holl - 8 Muzzin 2:25 2:25 0:47 1:44 3:26 1:34   2:09 1:28 4:00 2:01 1:58 0:44 0:31 1:03 1:01
44 Rielly - 83 Ceci 2:06 0:23 4:08 0:58 0:56 0:54   1:35 1:13 0:40 0:23 1:10 0:28 1:09 0:10 0:35
23 Dermott - 94 Barrie 3:00 2:57 0:37 2:27       1:26 2:17   0:38   0:18 1:09 0:35  
52 Marincin - 83 Ceci 0:41 0:07   0:20     0:09 0:01 0:19 0:47     0:48   0:42  
44 Rielly - 52 Marincin     0:08   1:00 1:03   0:10 0:08 1:04   0:59        
94 Barrie             0:27 1:26     0:31          
52 Marincin - 94 Barrie 1:01     0:33       0:32 0:34   1:01          
44 Rielly             0:45 0:36     0:17   0:34      

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 43.2% 43.2%    
Suzuki-Tatar-Drouin 34.7% 1.1% 33.7%  
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar-Drouin 4.5% 4.5%    
Domi-Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 3.5%   3.5%  
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Weal 2.2%   2.2%  
Others 11.9% 11.5% 0.4%  
Totals   60.3% 39.7%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Weise 56.4% 52.3% 4.1%  
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Weal 26.1% 1.8% 24.3%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar-Drouin 4.2% 4.2%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Kotkaniemi 3.2%   3.2%  
Byron-Danault 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 7.2% 3.3% 2.6% 1.3%
Totals   64.4% 34.4% 1.3%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 44.6% 44.6%    
Gallagher-Tatar-Drouin 30.3% 0.9% 29.4%  
Weise 4.1%     4.1%
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar-Drouin 3.9% 3.9%    
Gallagher-Domi-Kotkaniemi 3.0%   3.0%  
Others 14.0% 10.9% 1.4% 1.7%
Totals   60.4% 33.9% 5.8%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Lehkonen 48.8% 48.8%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 36.1% 2.5% 33.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Suzuki 4.5%   4.5%  
Gallagher-Domi-Weal 2.9%   2.9%  
Tatar-Gallagher 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.6% 4.9% 0.7%  
Totals   58.3% 41.7%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Domi 83.2% 77.1% 6.1%  
Suzuki 6.5%     6.5%
Weal-Danault 2.8% 2.8%    
Domi-Gallagher 2.1% 2.1%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.5% 1.6%   1.9%
Totals   85.5% 6.1% 8.4%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 51.5% 51.5%    
Armia 16.1% 0.1% 1.4% 14.6%
Byron-Lehkonen 9.7% 9.1% 0.6%  
Lehkonen 4.8%     4.8%
Lehkonen-Belzile 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 13.5% 10.2% 1.1% 2.2%
Totals   75.3% 3.1% 21.6%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Suzuki 49.4% 49.4%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Weal 27.0% 1.9% 25.1%  
Danault 13.1% 0.1% 1.1% 11.9%
Byron 6.6%     6.6%
Lehkonen-Suzuki 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 2.3% 1.1% 1.2%  
Totals   54.1% 27.4% 18.5%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 62.1% 62.1%    
Danault-Lehkonen 13.5% 12.7% 0.8%  
Armia 11.3%     11.3%
Domi-Danault 4.8% 4.8%    
Drouin-Suzuki 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 5.4% 2.9%   2.5%
Totals   85.4% 0.8% 13.8%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Weise 62.7% 58.1% 4.6%  
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Armia 29.1% 2.0% 27.1%  
Gallagher-Domi-Kotkaniemi 2.3%   2.3%  
Danault-Weise 2.1% 2.1%    
Danault-Belzile 1.0%   1.0%  
Others 2.8% 1.6% 0.6% 0.6%
Totals   63.8% 35.6% 0.6%
60 Belzile
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 36.9% 36.9%    
Drouin-Suzuki 30.1% 30.1%    
Danault 12.6%     12.6%
Gallagher-Danault 10.7% 10.7%    
Weal-Danault 9.7%   9.7%  
Totals   77.7% 9.7% 12.6%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 57.0% 57.0%    
Byron-Danault 12.4% 11.6% 0.7%  
Danault 6.1%     6.1%
Danault-Belzile 5.5% 5.5%    
Suzuki 2.9%     2.9%
Others 16.1% 13.8%   2.3%
Totals   87.9% 0.7% 11.3%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 47.0% 47.0%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Drouin 37.7% 1.1% 36.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Suzuki-Drouin 4.9% 4.9%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 2.2% 1.8% 0.4%  
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 6.4% 5.0% 1.4%  
Totals   61.7% 38.3%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 51.8% 51.8%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 35.2% 1.1% 34.2%  
Gallagher-Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 4.6% 4.6%    
Suzuki-Belzile 3.0% 3.0%    
Suzuki-Byron 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.5% 2.2% 1.3%  
Totals   64.6% 35.4%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 47.3% 37.1% 1.0% 9.1%
  30.2% 4.9% 25.3%  
Kulak 10.8% 9.9%   0.9%
Petry 5.0% 0.4% 0.3% 4.3%
Fleury 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 2.6% 2.6%    
Totals   59.0% 26.6% 14.3%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 67.9% 53.3% 1.5% 13.1%
Petry 8.4% 7.1% 1.3%  
Kulak 8.3% 8.3%    
Mete 6.3% 6.3%    
Ouellet 2.9% 1.1%   1.8%
Others 6.3% 0.9% 2.9% 2.6%
Totals   77.0% 5.6% 17.4%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ouellet 35.9% 35.9%    
Mete 27.7% 27.7%    
Kulak 15.2% 15.2%    
Weber 12.9% 12.9%    
Chiarot 5.7% 0.2%   5.5%
Others 2.5%   2.5%  
Totals   92.0% 2.5% 5.5%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 39.4% 39.4%    
  27.2% 1.0% 26.2%  
Ouellet 15.1% 10.4%   4.7%
Chiarot 7.3% 6.2% 1.1%  
Weber 6.2% 0.5% 0.3% 5.4%
Others 4.8% 3.8% 1.0%  
Totals   61.2% 28.7% 10.1%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ouellet 62.1% 48.4% 5.9% 7.7%
Fleury 19.9% 19.9%    
Chiarot 9.7% 9.7%    
Petry 6.7% 6.7%    
Weber 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   86.3% 5.9% 7.7%
61 Ouellet
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 48.4% 37.8% 4.6% 6.0%
Petry 20.8% 14.3%   6.5%
Fleury 20.1% 20.1%    
Kulak 4.0% 4.0%    
Chiarot 3.4% 1.3%   2.1%
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   80.7% 4.6% 14.7%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 57.0% 57.0%    
Weber 19.5% 17.8%   1.6%
Chiarot 10.4% 10.4%    
Fleury 8.9% 8.9%    
Ouellet 4.2% 4.2%    
Totals   98.4%   1.6%
Back to main page