Game #07 - September 28, 2019 - Ottawa 3 at Montreal 4 (OT)
Game #07 - September 28, 2019
  Ottawa   3   at     Montreal   4     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
 8:56 7:52 0:00 1:04 -1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 7:34 7:34 0:00 0:00 +1
21 Cousins25 Poehling40 Armia
 7:16 7:16 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher24 Danault43 Weal
 6:13 0:00 6:13 0:00 E
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
 5:12 5:12 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 14 Suzuki - 40 Armia - 90 Tatar 2:52 0:00 2:06 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:46 0:06 0:00 2:40 E
25 Poehling40 Armia
 1:43 0:00 0:00 1:43 E
14 Suzuki41 Byron
 1:38 0:21 0:00 1:17 E
11 Gallagher24 Danault
 1:35 1:19 0:00 0:16 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault40 Armia
 1:15 1:15 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron13 Domi14 Suzuki
 1:14 0:41 0:33 0:00 E
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi14 Suzuki
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
Others 14:47 11:36 1:07 2:04 +2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
53 Mete  6 Weber
 15:35 8:57 6:13 0:25 -2
17 Kulak83 Fleury
 11:41 11:17 0:24 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 10:36 9:51 0:35 0:10 +1
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 5:30 2:54 0:00 2:36 +1
26 Petry
 4:44 1:28 2:30 0:00 -1
53 Mete26 Petry
 4:33 1:05 0:17 3:11 E
26 Petry83 Fleury
 1:26 1:15 0:00 0:11 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:20 0:57 0:00 0:23 +1
  6 Weber
 1:19 1:19 0:00 0:00 +1
53 Mete
 1:17 1:17 0:00 0:00 E
83 Fleury  6 Weber
 1:16 0:34 0:00 0:42 E
  8 Chiarot17 Kulak
 1:12 1:12 0:00 0:00 E
17 Kulak
 1:04 0:00 0:00 1:04 E
17 Kulak26 Petry
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:28 1:06 0:00 0:22 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 62AL
13MD
14NS		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 21NC
25RP
40JA		 11BG
24PD
43JW		 41PB
15JK
43JW		 13MD
14NS
40JA
90TT		 24PD
62AL		 53VM
6SW		 17BK
83CF		 8BC
26JP		 8BC
6SW		 26JP 53VM
26JP
10 Duclair - 71 Tierney - 9 Ryan 1:26 2:50 2:31 0:04 1:11     0:56 3:59 3:18 1:03   0:02
21 Brown - 7 Tkachuk - 28 Brown 4:46 1:06 1:09   0:06     2:14 1:54 2:04 0:13    
89 Boedker - 44 Pageau - 19 Batherson 0:41 0:42 0:26   1:03     1:20 1:52 0:27     0:49
49 Sabourin - 78 Chlapik - 85 Abramov 0:20 1:07 1:18   1:00     2:33 0:34 0:33 0:04    
19 Batherson - 44 Pageau       2:00       2:00          
89 Boedker - 71 Tierney - 21 Brown     0:06         0:25   0:10     0:02
44 Pageau - 28 Brown       2:43       2:43          
7 Tkachuk - 10 Duclair - 9 Ryan - 28 Brown             1:24       1:36   0:43
10 Duclair - 71 Tierney       0:31   0:50   0:31   0:07   1:39 0:17
7 Tkachuk - 44 Pageau - 28 Brown 0:31   0:11   0:39   0:13   0:39 0:42 0:33    
74 Borowiecki - 83 Jaros 3:48 3:07 2:48 1:25 1:32 0:49   2:58 5:30 4:38 0:27 0:49 0:17
26 Brannstrom - 81 Hainsey 2:03 0:54 0:59 2:00 0:50   0:27 3:46 2:19 1:08 0:39   1:40
2 Demelo - 72 Chabot 1:03 2:31 1:57   1:25     4:00 1:43 2:13 0:10   0:06
72 Chabot             1:39       1:51 0:49 1:08
2 Demelo - 81 Hainsey 0:13     2:02 0:21 1:14   2:02 0:24 0:17   1:38  
72 Chabot - 81 Hainsey 0:15   0:06         0:31   0:25     0:16
26 Brannstrom             0:35       0:46 0:39 1:06
26 Brannstrom - 72 Chabot 1:27                 0:23      
2 Demelo - 74 Borowiecki     0:55 0:23 0:38     1:01   0:44 0:01    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 43.4% 43.4%    
Danault-Weal 35.7%   35.7%  
Danault 9.1% 7.6%   1.5%
Suzuki-Danault-Weal 3.7% 3.7%    
Byron-Danault 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 4.6% 4.6%    
Totals   62.8% 35.7% 1.5%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 51.5% 45.4%   6.2%
Suzuki-Armia-Tatar 16.5%   12.1%  
Byron-Suzuki 7.1% 3.9% 3.2%  
Byron 4.5% 4.5%    
Tatar-Lehkonen 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 20.5% 14.5% 3.8% 2.1%
Totals   72.6% 19.1% 8.3%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 47.0% 41.4%   5.6%
Domi-Armia-Tatar 15.1%   11.1%  
Byron 8.6% 1.8%   6.8%
Byron-Domi 6.5% 3.6% 2.9%  
Byron-Kotkaniemi 5.5% 5.5%    
Others 21.3% 16.8% 2.1% 2.5%
Totals   69.1% 16.1% 14.8%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 58.5% 58.5%    
Byron-Suzuki 11.8% 11.8%    
Cousins-Weal 7.9% 7.9%    
Tatar 6.2% 6.2%    
Armia 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 11.3% 9.4% 1.9%  
Totals   98.1% 1.9%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Armia 84.5% 84.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 8.1% 8.1%    
Poehling-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
Domi-Suzuki 1.9% 1.9%    
Domi-Poehling 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 33.7% 33.7%    
Gallagher-Weal 27.7%   27.7%  
Lehkonen 12.3% 0.4%   11.9%
Gallagher 7.1% 5.9%   1.2%
Lehkonen-Armia 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 13.7% 11.3%   2.4%
Totals   56.9% 27.7% 15.4%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Armia 60.9% 60.9%    
Armia 14.4%     14.4%
Lehkonen-Domi 5.7% 5.7%    
Byron-Weal 4.3% 4.3%    
Lehkonen-Danault 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 11.5% 10.2%   1.3%
Totals   84.4%   15.6%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Poehling 47.1% 47.1%    
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 18.6%   13.6%  
Poehling 11.1%     11.1%
Lehkonen-Danault 8.1% 8.1%    
Byron 3.2%     3.2%
Others 16.8% 8.4% 4.6% 3.8%
Totals   63.6% 18.3% 18.1%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 41.6% 41.6%    
Suzuki 13.1% 2.8%   10.3%
Domi-Suzuki 9.9% 5.5% 4.4%  
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 8.4% 8.4%    
Domi 6.3% 6.3%    
Others 20.8% 16.8%   4.0%
Totals   81.3% 4.4% 14.3%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Gallagher-Danault 43.1%   43.1%  
Byron-Kotkaniemi 36.1% 36.1%    
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 4.9% 4.9%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 4.5% 4.5%    
Byron-Poehling 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 7.9% 3.1% 4.7%  
Totals   52.1% 47.9%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 55.9% 49.3%   6.7%
Danault 17.3% 0.6%   16.7%
Danault-Armia 7.8% 7.8%    
Tatar-Domi 4.6% 4.6%    
Domi-Poehling 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 10.0% 5.8%   4.2%
Totals   72.4%   27.6%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 48.8% 48.8%    
Domi-Suzuki-Armia 18.5%   13.5%  
Suzuki 4.7% 4.7%    
Domi-Lehkonen 4.7% 4.7%    
Domi-Suzuki 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 23.5% 16.3% 7.2%  
Totals   79.2% 20.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 61.9% 35.6% 24.7% 1.7%
Chiarot 21.9% 11.5%   10.3%
Petry 5.3% 3.8%   1.5%
  5.2% 5.2%    
Fleury 5.0% 2.3%   2.8%
Others 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   59.0% 24.7% 16.3%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 58.1% 54.0% 3.2% 0.9%
Weber 30.1% 15.9%   14.2%
Kulak 6.6% 6.6%    
Fleury 4.7% 4.7%    
Fleury-Weber 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   81.6% 3.2% 15.2%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 77.1% 74.5% 2.6%  
Chiarot 7.9% 7.9%    
  7.0%     7.0%
Petry 6.9% 6.9%    
Mete 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   90.3% 2.6% 7.0%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 46.2% 43.0% 2.5% 0.7%
  20.6% 6.4% 10.9%  
Mete 19.8% 4.7% 1.2% 13.9%
Fleury 6.2% 5.5%   0.8%
Weber 5.8% 4.1%   1.7%
Others 4.6% 4.6%    
Totals   68.2% 14.7% 17.1%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 72.5% 41.6% 28.9% 1.9%
Petry 21.2% 5.0% 1.3% 14.8%
  6.0% 6.0%    
Kulak 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   53.0% 30.2% 16.7%
83 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 76.2% 73.6% 2.6%  
Petry 9.3% 8.2%   1.2%
Weber 8.3% 3.7%   4.6%
Chiarot 5.5% 5.5%    
Chiarot-Weber 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   91.6% 2.6% 5.8%
Back to main page