Game #28 - December 2, 2017 - Detroit 1 at Montreal 10
Game #28 - December 2, 2017
  Detroit   1   at     Montreal   10
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty24 Danault65 Shaw
 14:52 14:52 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 11:54 11:54 0:00 0:00 +1
27 Galchenyuk25 De la Rose41 Byron
 11:25 11:25 0:00 0:00 +3
20 Deslauriers42 Froese43 Carr
 10:03 10:03 0:00 0:00 +2
54 Hudon65 Shaw27 Galchenyuk
 1:21 0:00 1:21 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty65 Shaw41 Byron
 1:01 0:00 1:01 0:00 E
Others 9:24 6:25 0:59 2:00 +2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 19:01 18:03 0:00 0:58 +2
53 Mete21 Schlemko
 16:03 16:03 0:00 0:00 +5
22 Alzner26 Petry
 15:57 14:59 0:00 0:58 +1
22 Alzner  8 Benn
 1:32 1:32 0:00 0:00 E
21 Schlemko26 Petry
 1:21 1:21 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 1:21 0:00 1:21 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:13 0:00 1:09 0:04 E
Others 3:32 2:41 0:51 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
24PD
65AS		 54CH
14TP
11BG		 27AG
25JD
41PB		 20ND
42BF
43DC		 8JB
6SW		 53VM
21DS		 22KA
26JP
14 Nyquist - 40 Zetterberg - 42 Frk 5:24 1:08 2:01 2:11 4:30 1:32 4:25
21 Tatar - 71 Larkin - 39 Mantha 3:28 3:23 1:32 0:53 1:13 5:05 3:17
8 Abdelkader - 51 Nielsen - 43 Helm 0:17 3:35 3:34   3:54 2:23 1:18
52 Ericsson - 83 Daley 5:13 2:00 0:20 1:05 5:00 2:55 1:42
25 Green - 65 Dekeyser 3:57 2:23 0:42 0:30 2:08 2:25 3:18
55 Kronwall - 83 Daley 0:01 1:36 1:34 1:41 2:51 0:59 1:12
25 Green - 55 Kronwall 1:43 0:28 0:28 0:50 0:32 0:25 1:50
3 Jensen - 52 Ericsson 1:05 1:29 0:08 1:20 0:31 1:34 1:00
3 Jensen - 65 Dekeyser   0:30 1:35 0:28 0:11 1:36 0:58
61 Ouellet - 65 Dekeyser 0:31 0:45 1:55 0:15 2:08 0:53 0:39
52 Ericsson - 61 Ouellet 1:03 0:14 0:24 0:52 0:56 0:05 1:39
3 Jensen - 55 Kronwall 0:06 0:06 2:06   1:07 0:59 0:12
25 Green - 61 Ouellet   1:07 0:03 0:34 0:02 1:26 0:17

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Plekanec 81.6% 81.6%    
Danault-Galchenyuk-Hudon 3.5% 0.8% 2.7%  
Plekanec 3.4% 2.7%   0.7%
Pacioretty-Plekanec 2.7% 2.7%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 6.5% 6.5%    
Totals   96.6% 2.7% 0.7%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Gallagher 79.8% 79.8%    
Gallagher 3.4% 2.7%   0.7%
Byron 2.9%     2.9%
Pacioretty-Gallagher 2.7% 2.7%    
Deslauriers-Froese 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 8.8% 8.8%    
Totals   96.4%   3.6%
20 Deslauriers
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Froese-Carr 80.5% 80.5%    
De la Rose 4.5%     4.5%
Plekanec-Froese 2.9% 2.9%    
Danault-Shaw 2.0% 2.0%    
Froese-Shaw 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 8.1% 6.7%   1.5%
Totals   94.0%   6.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Shaw 86.2% 86.2%    
Gallagher-Galchenyuk-Hudon 3.0% 0.7% 2.3%  
Galchenyuk-Hudon-Shaw 2.6%   2.6%  
Galchenyuk-Shaw 2.0% 1.3% 0.8%  
Deslauriers-Shaw 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 4.7% 4.7%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Byron 83.6% 83.6%    
Deslauriers 4.2%     4.2%
Hudon-Byron 3.7% 3.7%    
Galchenyuk-Shaw 2.7% 2.7%    
Galchenyuk-Carr 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 3.9% 3.9%    
Totals   95.8%   4.2%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Byron 74.1% 74.1%    
Hudon-Shaw 8.8%   8.8%  
Gallagher-Danault-Hudon 3.4% 0.8% 2.6%  
Danault-Hudon-Shaw 2.9%   2.9%  
De la Rose-Shaw 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 8.4% 7.6% 0.9%  
Totals   84.8% 15.2%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-De la Rose 81.2% 81.2%    
Pacioretty-Shaw 7.2%   7.2%  
Hudon-De la Rose 3.6% 3.6%    
Plekanec 3.1%     3.1%
Danault 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   89.7% 7.2% 3.1%
42 Froese
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Deslauriers-Carr 80.9% 80.9%    
Pacioretty 5.8%     5.8%
Deslauriers-Plekanec 3.0% 3.0%    
Deslauriers 1.9% 0.4%   1.5%
Pacioretty-Deslauriers 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 6.6% 6.6%    
Totals   92.8%   7.2%
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Deslauriers-Froese 93.3% 93.3%    
Galchenyuk-De la Rose 2.5% 2.5%    
Galchenyuk-Froese 1.7% 1.7%    
Deslauriers-Danault 1.4% 1.4%    
Pacioretty-Froese 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 76.6% 76.6%    
Shaw-Galchenyuk 8.7%   8.7%  
Gallagher-Danault-Galchenyuk 3.3% 0.8% 2.6%  
De la Rose-Byron 3.2% 3.2%    
Danault-Galchenyuk-Shaw 2.9%   2.9%  
Others 5.3% 5.3%    
Totals   85.8% 14.2%  
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Danault 76.3% 76.3%    
Hudon-Galchenyuk 6.9%   6.9%  
Pacioretty-Byron 5.2%   5.2%  
Danault-Galchenyuk-Hudon 2.3%   2.3%  
Galchenyuk-De la Rose 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 7.4% 6.7% 0.7%  
Totals   84.9% 15.1%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Shaw 83.7% 83.7%    
Shaw-Byron 5.7%   5.7%  
Froese 4.0%     4.0%
Plekanec-Gallagher 2.3% 2.3%    
Plekanec-Shaw 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   90.2% 5.7% 4.0%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 84.9% 80.6%   4.3%
  6.0%   6.0%  
Petry 5.4%   5.1% 0.3%
Alzner 2.5% 2.5%    
Schlemko 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   84.2% 11.2% 4.6%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 85.9% 81.5%   4.4%
Alzner 6.9% 6.9%    
Mete 3.2% 3.2%    
Petry 3.1% 3.1%    
Schlemko 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   95.6%   4.4%
21 Schlemko
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 85.5% 85.5%    
Petry 7.2% 7.2%    
  5.2% 0.6% 4.5%  
Benn 1.2% 1.2%    
Weber 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   95.5% 4.5%  
22 Alzner
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 87.6% 82.3%   5.3%
Benn 8.4% 8.4%    
Weber 3.1% 3.1%    
Mete 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   94.7%   5.3%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Alzner 83.1% 78.0%   5.0%
Schlemko 7.0% 7.0%    
Weber 6.3%   6.0% 0.3%
Benn 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   88.6% 6.0% 5.4%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Schlemko 94.6% 94.6%    
Benn 4.1% 4.1%    
Alzner 0.9% 0.9%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page