Game #11 - October 28, 2017 - N.Y. Rangers 4 at Montreal 5
Game #11 - October 28, 2017
  N.Y. Rangers   4   at     Montreal   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty24 Danault65 Shaw
 9:49 9:49 0:00 0:00 +3
62 Lehkonen92 Drouin41 Byron
 6:51 6:51 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 5:33 5:33 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen - 65 Shaw - 67 Pacioretty - 92 Drouin 5:22 0:00 5:22 0:00 E
27 Galchenyuk34 McCarron17 Mitchell
 3:46 3:46 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault67 Pacioretty
 2:31 1:01 0:00 1:30 E
27 Galchenyuk24 Danault11 Gallagher
 2:04 0:06 1:58 0:00 E
14 Plekanec62 Lehkonen
 1:32 0:00 0:00 1:32 E
54 Hudon14 Plekanec41 Byron
 1:25 0:53 0:32 0:00 E
24 Danault14 Plekanec41 Byron
 1:21 1:21 0:00 0:00 E
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 24 Danault - 27 Galchenyuk - 92 Drouin 1:02 0:00 1:02 0:00 E
Others 17:34 14:05 1:24 2:05 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
88 Davidson26 Petry
 12:01 11:19 0:00 0:42 +1
22 Alzner  8 Benn
 11:56 11:56 0:00 0:00 E
22 Alzner  6 Weber
 7:56 6:32 0:00 1:24 -1
53 Mete  6 Weber
 7:42 7:27 0:15 0:00 +1
  6 Weber
 6:26 0:00 6:26 0:00 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 3:43 2:00 0:00 1:43 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 3:07 0:23 2:44 0:00 E
88 Davidson  6 Weber
 1:54 1:54 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 1:34 0:16 0:00 1:18 E
Others 3:41 2:48 0:53 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
24PD
65AS		 62AL
92JD
41PB		 54CH
14TP
11BG		 62AL
65AS
67MP
92JD		 27AG
34MM
17TM		 24PD
67MP		 27AG
24PD
11BG		 88BD
26JP		 22KA
8JB		 22KA
6SW		 53VM
6SW		 6SW 8JB
26JP		 53VM
26JP
20 Kreider - 51 Desharnais - 36 Zuccarello 0:46 1:32 3:32   0:10     3:24 5:10 0:31 0:19      
61 Nash - 93 Zibanejad - 10 Miller 5:18 0:59 0:10   0:35 0:07   1:14 0:50 2:48 2:16   1:13  
89 Buchnevich - 24 Nieves - 40 Grabner 0:52 1:49 0:39   2:41     1:52 2:32 0:02 2:20   0:12  
26 Vesey - 13 Hayes - 17 Fast 0:52 1:54 0:23       0:06 1:19 1:46   0:37      
61 Nash - 93 Zibanejad       1:21   0:57 0:48     1:11   1:21   0:49
13 Hayes - 17 Fast       3:09     0:20       0:14 3:14   0:20
61 Nash - 89 Buchnevich - 10 Miller - 93 Zibanejad               0:12   1:16     0:20  
27 McDonagh - 42 Smith 2:32 1:30 2:54 0:04 0:26 0:07   1:59 3:33 2:29 3:19 0:04 0:53  
55 Holden - 76 Skjei 2:41 1:32 1:00 0:49 0:25   0:47 2:05 3:16 0:52 0:50 1:16   0:48
22 Shattenkirk - 76 Skjei 2:09 0:35 0:20   0:33 1:01   2:59 1:30 1:01 0:01   1:05  
18 Staal - 27 McDonagh       4:09     0:13       0:01 4:46   1:21
18 Staal - 22 Shattenkirk 1:11 1:20 1:03   1:37     2:06 1:59   1:20      
18 Staal - 55 Holden 0:44 0:57     0:35   0:06 0:50 0:51 0:06 1:22      
22 Shattenkirk           0:16   0:28   1:16     0:41  
22 Shattenkirk - 27 McDonagh 0:06 0:05           0:06 0:02 1:13 0:23      
42 Smith - 55 Holden   0:02 0:07 0:20     0:58 0:19   0:02   0:20   0:58

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Plekanec 40.0% 40.0%    
Galchenyuk-Danault 14.9% 0.7% 14.2%  
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 8.4% 8.4%    
Danault-Galchenyuk-Drouin 7.4%   7.4%  
Pacioretty-Danault 6.5% 5.8% 0.7%  
Others 22.8% 17.8%   5.0%
Totals   72.6% 22.3% 5.0%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Gallagher 31.8% 31.8%    
Lehkonen 8.8%     8.8%
Hudon-Byron 8.1% 5.1% 3.1%  
Danault-Byron 7.7% 7.7%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 6.7% 6.7%    
Others 36.9% 29.1% 2.3% 5.5%
Totals   80.3% 5.3% 14.3%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-McCarron 43.5% 43.5%    
Hudon-McCarron 10.2% 10.2%    
Pacioretty-Drouin 8.3% 8.3%    
Hudon-Plekanec 8.1% 8.1%    
Byron 6.4% 1.5%   4.8%
Others 23.5% 19.5%   4.0%
Totals   91.1%   8.9%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Shaw 50.1% 50.1%    
Pacioretty 12.9% 5.2%   7.7%
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 10.6% 0.5% 10.0%  
Plekanec-Byron 6.9% 6.9%    
Gallagher-Galchenyuk-Drouin 5.3%   5.3%  
Others 14.3% 10.0% 0.5% 3.8%
Totals   72.7% 15.8% 11.5%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Mitchell 34.9% 34.9%    
Danault-Gallagher 19.2% 0.9% 18.2%  
Plekanec-Gallagher 10.8% 10.8%    
Gallagher-Danault-Drouin 9.6%   9.6%  
McCarron-Gallagher 7.0% 7.0%    
Others 18.5% 13.0% 5.6%  
Totals   66.6% 33.4%  
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 50.6% 50.6%    
Hudon-Mitchell 11.9% 11.9%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 10.1% 10.1%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 8.7% 8.7%    
Plekanec 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 13.6% 13.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Drouin 49.0% 49.0%    
Hudon-Plekanec 10.1% 6.3% 3.8%  
Danault-Plekanec 9.7% 9.7%    
Hudon-Drouin 6.2% 6.2%    
Mitchell 3.9% 1.0%   3.0%
Others 21.1% 16.9% 3.3% 0.8%
Totals   89.0% 7.2% 3.8%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 51.4% 51.4%    
Plekanec-Byron 13.1% 8.2% 4.9%  
McCarron-Mitchell 8.2% 8.2%    
Drouin-Byron 8.0% 8.0%    
Plekanec-Mitchell 6.5% 6.5%    
Others 12.8% 11.6% 1.2%  
Totals   93.8% 6.2%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Byron 41.5% 41.5%    
Shaw-Pacioretty-Drouin 32.5%   32.5%  
Plekanec 9.3%     9.3%
Drouin 5.2% 5.2%    
Drouin-Shaw 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 8.1% 8.1%    
Totals   58.2% 32.5% 9.3%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Danault 51.5% 51.5%    
Lehkonen-Pacioretty-Drouin 28.1%   28.1%  
Pacioretty-Plekanec 4.1% 2.8% 1.3%  
Lehkonen-Drouin 3.0% 3.0%    
Galchenyuk-Pacioretty-Drouin 2.4%   2.4%  
Others 10.9% 8.0% 2.4% 0.5%
Totals   65.3% 34.2% 0.5%
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Shaw 44.5% 44.5%    
Lehkonen-Shaw-Drouin 24.3%   24.3%  
Danault 11.4% 4.6%   6.8%
Danault-Gallagher 4.1% 3.6% 0.5%  
Plekanec-Shaw 3.5% 2.4% 1.1%  
Others 12.2% 6.5% 4.1% 1.6%
Totals   61.6% 30.0% 8.4%
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Byron 36.4% 36.4%    
Lehkonen-Shaw-Pacioretty 28.5%   28.5%  
Gallagher-Danault-Galchenyuk 5.5%   5.5%  
Lehkonen 4.6% 4.6%    
Hudon-Byron 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 20.4% 15.6% 4.8%  
Totals   61.2% 38.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Alzner 30.1% 24.8%   5.3%
Mete 29.2% 28.3% 0.9%  
  24.4%   24.4%  
Davidson 7.2% 7.2%    
Benn 5.9% 1.0%   4.9%
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   64.4% 25.3% 10.2%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Alzner 65.3% 65.3%    
Petry 20.3% 10.9%   9.4%
Weber 8.6% 1.5%   7.1%
Davidson 5.1% 5.1%    
Alzner-Weber 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   83.5%   16.5%
22 Alzner
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 56.7% 56.7%    
Weber 37.7% 31.0%   6.7%
Davidson 3.0% 3.0%    
Petry 1.0% 1.0% 0.1%  
Mete 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   93.3% 0.1% 6.7%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Davidson 58.2% 54.8%   3.4%
Benn 18.0% 9.7%   8.3%
Mete 15.1% 1.9% 13.2%  
  4.2%   4.2%  
Weber 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 1.1% 1.0% 0.1%  
Totals   70.8% 17.5% 11.7%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 69.9% 67.6% 2.3%  
Petry 28.3% 3.5% 24.8%  
Alzner 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   72.9% 27.1%  
88 Davidson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 77.6% 73.1%   4.5%
Weber 12.3% 12.3%    
Benn 6.0% 6.0%    
Alzner 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   95.5%   4.5%
Back to main page