Game #66 - March 4, 2017 - Montreal 4 at N.Y. Rangers 1
Game #66 - March 4, 2017
  Montreal   4   at     N.Y. Rangers   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty24 Danault11 Gallagher
 14:47 14:31 0:16 0:00 E
41 Byron14 Plekanec65 Shaw
 11:45 11:45 0:00 0:00 E
21 King27 Galchenyuk62 Lehkonen
 10:56 10:56 0:00 0:00 +1
37 Martinsen92 Ott17 Mitchell
 9:17 9:17 0:00 0:00 E
27 Galchenyuk67 Pacioretty
 1:02 0:00 1:02 0:00 E
41 Byron17 Mitchell65 Shaw
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:11 10:29 0:42 0:00 +2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  6 Weber
 19:54 18:48 1:06 0:00 +1
74 Emelin26 Petry
 16:32 16:32 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu  8 Benn
 15:55 15:55 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin  6 Weber
 1:23 1:23 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 1:07 1:07 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu26 Petry
 1:04 0:17 0:47 0:00 E
Others 4:05 3:58 0:07 0:00 +2

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
24PD
11BG		 41PB
14TP
65AS		 21DK
27AG
62AL		 37AM
92SO
17TM		 79AM
6SW		 74AE
26JP		 28NB
8JB
20 Kreider - 21 Stepan - 36 Zuccarello 7:32 1:07 1:03 3:23 5:24 4:49 4:13
26 Vesey - 13 Hayes - 10 Miller 2:55 6:19 1:37 1:03 4:12 5:18 2:37
61 Nash - 93 Zibanejad - 89 Buchnevich 1:53 2:03 3:35 1:42 2:45 3:15 3:18
12 Puempel - 24 Lindberg - 73 Pirri 0:20 0:45 2:49 2:20 2:28 1:50 2:42
27 McDonagh - 42 Smith 9:55 2:02 3:13 1:43 6:23 5:27 6:17
18 Staal - 22 Holden 3:13 6:06 3:58 2:15 6:49 4:08 4:21
4 Clendening - 76 Skjei 0:44 2:43 2:37 4:43 4:38 5:51 3:20

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Danault 81.8% 80.3% 1.5%  
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 2.7% 1.9% 0.7%  
Pacioretty-Ott 2.6% 2.6%    
Shaw-Plekanec 2.6% 2.6%    
King-Galchenyuk 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 8.0% 6.2% 1.8%  
Totals   95.9% 4.1%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Shaw 80.2% 80.2%    
Martinsen-Shaw 5.3% 5.3%    
Lehkonen 3.5% 3.5%    
Shaw-Gallagher 3.2% 3.2%    
Martinsen-Mitchell 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Martinsen-Ott 68.8% 68.8%    
Byron-Shaw 7.7% 7.7%    
Pacioretty-Ott 4.8% 4.8%    
Martinsen-Galchenyuk 3.6% 3.6%    
King-Galchenyuk 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 12.3% 12.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 King
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Lehkonen 83.9% 83.9%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 2.9% 2.9%    
Danault-Lehkonen 2.8% 2.8%    
Danault-Gallagher 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 5.0% 5.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 82.4% 80.9% 1.5%  
Pacioretty-Lehkonen 3.7% 3.7%    
Byron-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
King-Lehkonen 2.0% 2.0%    
Shaw-Gallagher 2.0% 0.2% 1.9%  
Others 7.4% 6.5% 0.9%  
Totals   95.7% 4.3%  
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
King-Lehkonen 75.7% 75.7%    
Pacioretty 7.2%   7.2%  
Pacioretty-Gallagher 3.3% 2.4% 0.9%  
Martinsen-Mitchell 3.3% 3.3%    
King-Gallagher 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 7.5% 7.5%    
Totals   91.9% 8.1%  
37 Martinsen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Ott-Mitchell 79.3% 79.3%    
Plekanec-Shaw 6.7% 6.7%    
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 4.1% 4.1%    
Plekanec-Mitchell 2.7% 2.7%    
Danault-Gallagher 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 5.0% 3.0% 2.0%  
Totals   98.0% 2.0%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Shaw 80.3% 80.3%    
Mitchell-Shaw 7.1% 7.1%    
Danault-Shaw 2.8% 2.8%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 1.9% 1.9%    
Ott-Mitchell 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 5.9% 5.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
King-Galchenyuk 81.9% 81.9%    
Pacioretty-Danault 5.0% 5.0%    
Plekanec 3.9% 3.9%    
King-Danault 2.7% 2.7%    
Mitchell 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Plekanec 72.6% 72.6%    
Byron-Mitchell 6.4% 6.4%    
Martinsen-Plekanec 4.8% 4.8%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
Byron-Danault 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 10.7% 7.2% 3.5%  
Totals   96.5% 3.5%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 77.8% 76.4% 1.4%  
Galchenyuk 5.4%   5.4%  
Danault-Lehkonen 3.5% 3.5%    
Ott-Mitchell 3.4% 3.4%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 2.5% 1.8% 0.7%  
Others 7.3% 7.3%    
Totals   92.5% 7.5%  
92 Ott
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Martinsen-Mitchell 80.8% 80.8%    
Pacioretty-Mitchell 5.7% 5.7%    
Pacioretty-Gallagher 4.1% 4.1%    
Byron-Mitchell 2.5% 2.5%    
King-Mitchell 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 4.9% 4.4% 0.6%  
Totals   99.4% 0.6%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 88.7% 83.8% 4.9%  
Emelin 6.2% 6.2%    
Beaulieu 4.2% 3.7% 0.5%  
Petry 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   94.6% 5.4%  
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 84.9% 84.9%    
Petry 6.0% 6.0%    
Emelin 5.0% 5.0%    
Markov 4.2% 4.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 87.2% 87.2%    
Benn 5.9% 5.9%    
Beaulieu 5.6% 1.5% 4.1%  
Weber 1.1% 1.1%    
Markov 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   95.9% 4.1%  
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 84.4% 84.4%    
Petry 5.7% 1.5% 4.2%  
Weber 5.0% 4.4% 0.6%  
Emelin 4.2% 4.2%    
Markov 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   95.2% 4.8%  
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 83.2% 83.2%    
Weber 7.0% 7.0%    
Benn 4.7% 4.7%    
Beaulieu 3.9% 3.9%    
Markov 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 94.2% 89.0% 5.2%  
Benn 3.7% 3.7%    
Emelin 1.2% 1.2%    
Beaulieu 0.6% 0.6%    
Petry 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   94.8% 5.2%  
Back to main page