Game #56 - February 9, 2017 - Montreal 5 at Arizona 4 (OT)
Game #56 - February 9, 2017
  Montreal   5   at     Arizona   4     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty24 Danault47 Radulov
 14:47 14:47 0:00 0:00 +2
42 Andrighetto14 Plekanec65 Shaw
 13:13 13:13 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen27 Galchenyuk41 Byron
 10:01 10:01 0:00 0:00 E
43 Carr34 McCarron17 Mitchell
 9:28 9:19 0:09 0:00 +1
24 Danault67 Pacioretty
 1:41 1:14 0:00 0:27 E
27 Galchenyuk47 Radulov
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 -1
17 Mitchell41 Byron
 1:01 0:00 0:00 1:01 E
Others 10:54 8:05 1:25 1:24 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Emelin  6 Weber
 19:47 17:49 0:06 1:52 E
79 Markov26 Petry
 19:38 17:59 0:39 1:00 +1
28 Beaulieu  8 Pateryn
 15:50 15:50 0:00 0:00 -1
Others 6:58 6:09 0:49 0:00 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
24PD
47AR		 42SA
14TP
65AS		 62AL
27AG
41PB		 43DC
34MM
17TM		 74AE
6SW		 79AM
26JP		 28NB
8GP
88 McGinn - 91 Burmistrov - 16 Domi 3:50 0:37 6:09 1:21 3:17 2:08 6:43
29 Perlini - 18 Dvorak - 19 Doan 1:44 5:33 0:44 0:53 4:01 2:34 2:40
67 Crouse - 48 Martinook - 25 White 1:24 1:53 1:41 0:41 1:56 2:17 1:52
8 Rieder - 48 Martinook - 17 Vrbata 4:42 0:05     1:15 2:46 0:44
8 Rieder - 13 Holland - 17 Vrbata 1:20 1:51 0:01 0:33 1:43 1:40  
67 Crouse - 13 Holland - 25 White       2:45 1:42 0:59 0:10
8 Rieder - 18 Dvorak - 19 Doan 0:25 1:37   0:32 0:55 1:38  
29 Perlini - 13 Holland - 17 Vrbata   0:37 0:37 0:39 1:01 0:37 0:45
2 Schenn - 23 Ekman-Larsson 8:39 2:16 3:47 1:58 5:40 5:59 5:54
26 Stone - 33 Goligoski 4:42 5:16 3:55 1:39 4:12 8:23 6:03
5 Murphy - 6 Chychrun 0:31 5:35 2:05 5:27 7:06 3:34 3:33
23 Ekman-Larsson         0:59 0:49  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Andrighetto-Shaw 78.9% 78.9%    
Lehkonen-Andrighetto 4.9%   4.9%  
Lehkonen 3.9%     3.9%
Andrighetto-Radulov 3.4% 3.4%    
Radulov 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 5.7% 4.0%   1.7%
Totals   89.6% 4.9% 5.6%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-McCarron 76.5% 75.3% 1.2%  
Byron 8.2%     8.2%
Lehkonen-McCarron 5.0% 5.0%    
Carr-Danault 4.4% 4.4%    
Lehkonen 3.8%     3.8%
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   86.8% 1.2% 12.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Radulov 80.4% 80.4%    
Pacioretty 9.2% 6.7%   2.4%
Carr-Mitchell 3.0% 3.0%    
Andrighetto-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
Andrighetto-Radulov 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 3.4% 2.8% 0.5%  
Totals   97.0% 0.5% 2.4%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Byron 72.1% 72.1%    
Radulov 8.2% 8.2%    
Pacioretty-Radulov 6.5% 2.9% 3.6%  
Lehkonen-Andrighetto 2.9% 2.9%    
Lehkonen-Radulov 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 8.0% 8.0%    
Totals   96.4% 3.6%  
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Mitchell 82.9% 81.6% 1.3%  
Lehkonen-Mitchell 5.4% 5.4%    
Lehkonen-Byron 4.5% 4.5%    
Carr-Shaw 3.4% 3.4%    
Pacioretty-Radulov 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   98.7% 1.3%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Galchenyuk 78.2% 78.2%    
Mitchell 7.9%     7.9%
Radulov 5.1% 5.1%    
Lehkonen-McCarron 4.0% 4.0%    
Pacioretty-Danault 1.3% 0.5% 0.8%  
Others 3.5% 3.3%   0.3%
Totals   91.0% 0.8% 8.2%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Shaw 82.5% 82.5%    
Lehkonen-Plekanec 5.1%   5.1%  
Plekanec-Radulov 3.5% 3.5%    
Danault-Shaw 2.6% 2.6%    
Lehkonen-Galchenyuk 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   94.9% 5.1%  
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Mitchell 87.7% 86.3% 1.4%  
Danault-Mitchell 5.1% 5.1%    
McCarron-Shaw 3.5% 3.5%    
McCarron-Radulov 1.1% 1.1%    
Galchenyuk-Byron 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   98.6% 1.4%  
47 Radulov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Danault 74.0% 74.0%    
Galchenyuk 5.7% 5.7%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 4.5% 2.0% 2.5%  
Byron 3.3% 3.3%    
Andrighetto-Plekanec 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 9.7% 9.7%    
Totals   97.5% 2.5%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Byron 71.8% 71.8%    
Plekanec-Andrighetto 5.9%   5.9%  
Plekanec 4.7%     4.7%
McCarron-Mitchell 4.4% 4.4%    
McCarron-Byron 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 9.6% 6.2%   3.3%
Totals   86.1% 5.9% 8.0%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Andrighetto-Plekanec 92.2% 92.2%    
Andrighetto-Danault 2.9% 2.9%    
Carr-McCarron 2.7% 2.7%    
Lehkonen-Galchenyuk 0.9% 0.9%    
Pacioretty-Danault 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Radulov 77.2% 77.2%    
Danault 8.8% 6.4%   2.3%
Galchenyuk-Radulov 4.7% 2.1% 2.6%  
Plekanec-Radulov 2.0% 2.0%    
Galchenyuk 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 5.7% 3.8% 0.5% 1.3%
Totals   93.2% 3.1% 3.7%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 91.0% 82.0% 0.5% 8.6%
Markov 4.0% 0.2% 3.8%  
  3.0% 3.0%    
Beaulieu 1.6% 1.6%    
Petry 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   87.2% 4.2% 8.6%
8 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 97.8% 97.8%    
Emelin 1.8% 1.8%    
Petry 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 90.8% 83.2% 3.0% 4.6%
  3.5% 3.5%    
Emelin 2.8% 2.8%    
Beaulieu 2.2% 2.2%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   92.4% 3.0% 4.6%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 86.4% 86.4%    
Markov 5.1% 5.1%    
Emelin 3.7% 3.7%    
Petry 2.6% 2.6%    
Weber 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 91.0% 81.9% 0.5% 8.6%
Beaulieu 3.1% 3.1%    
Petry 2.8% 2.8%    
Markov 1.8% 1.8%    
Pateryn 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   91.0% 0.5% 8.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 86.9% 79.6% 2.9% 4.4%
Beaulieu 4.1% 4.1%    
Weber 3.8% 0.2% 3.6%  
  3.4% 3.4%    
Emelin 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   89.1% 6.5% 4.4%
Back to main page