Game #28 - December 10, 2016 - Colorado 1 at Montreal 10
Game #28 - December 10, 2016
  Colorado   1   at     Montreal   10
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec47 Radulov
 12:22 12:22 0:00 0:00 +3
41 Byron17 Mitchell11 Gallagher
 11:45 11:45 0:00 0:00 +1
43 Carr32 Flynn42 Andrighetto
 10:00 10:00 0:00 0:00 +2
62 Lehkonen24 Danault65 Shaw
 9:40 9:37 0:03 0:00 +1
17 Mitchell62 Lehkonen
 1:55 0:21 0:00 1:34 E
24 Danault41 Byron
 1:25 0:00 0:00 1:25 E
67 Pacioretty32 Flynn47 Radulov
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:51 7:04 2:00 2:47 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
28 Beaulieu20 Redmond
 18:43 18:42 0:00 0:01 +4
74 Emelin  6 Weber
 17:57 16:03 0:00 1:54 +2
79 Markov26 Petry
 15:23 13:44 0:03 1:36 +2
79 Markov  6 Weber
 2:01 0:03 1:55 0:03 E
28 Beaulieu  6 Weber
 1:28 0:04 0:00 1:24 E
28 Beaulieu26 Petry
 1:28 0:35 0:05 0:48 E
Others 3:00 3:00 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
14TP
47AR		 41PB
17TM
11BG		 43DC
32BF
42SA		 62AL
24PD
65AS		 28NB
20ZR		 74AE
6SW		 79AM
26JP		 79AM
6SW
92 Landeskog - 34 Soderberg - 25 Grigorenko 1:24 4:07 2:27 2:49 7:48 1:14 2:39  
9 Duchene - 7 Mitchell - 96 Rantanen 3:00 3:57 1:39 2:30 2:15 5:45 3:51  
14 Comeau - 29 MacKinnon - 17 Bourque 3:32 1:35 1:11 2:39 1:21 3:40 4:07  
27 Martinsen - 8 Colborne - 12 Iginla 1:21 1:51 2:15 0:39 4:08 1:28 1:02 0:03
25 Grigorenko - 34 Soderberg - 17 Bourque     0:05 0:19 0:24 1:49 0:09  
4 Barrie - 16 Zadorov 4:02 6:52 1:12 1:50 3:28 5:42 5:29  
18 Goloubef - 32 Beauchemin 3:12 2:11 2:47 3:57 6:14 4:59 1:49 0:54
28 Wiercioch - 51 Tyutin 2:53 1:16 4:48 2:30 4:54 3:13 4:25  
28 Wiercioch - 32 Beauchemin 0:01 0:01   0:33 0:56 1:40 0:01  
18 Goloubef - 51 Tyutin 0:33   0:39 0:10 0:17 1:24 0:28  
4 Barrie           0:14 1:07  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Mitchell 82.2% 82.2%    
Lehkonen-Danault 4.8% 4.8%    
Byron-Plekanec 4.5% 2.0% 2.6%  
Carr-Mitchell 3.3% 3.3%    
Carr-Flynn 2.6% 2.0% 0.6%  
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   96.9% 3.1%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Radulov 76.4% 76.4%    
Pacioretty 6.0%     6.0%
Byron-Radulov 5.4% 0.9% 4.4%  
Byron-Gallagher 4.0% 1.8% 2.3%  
Carr-Andrighetto 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 6.2% 6.1%   0.1%
Totals   87.2% 6.7% 6.1%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Gallagher 72.9% 72.9%    
Lehkonen 11.9% 2.2%   9.7%
Byron 4.4%     4.4%
Pacioretty-Radulov 3.6% 3.6%    
Carr-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 4.2% 4.2%    
Totals   85.8%   14.2%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 65.3% 65.0% 0.3%  
Byron 9.6%     9.6%
Lehkonen-Gallagher 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen 3.7% 1.1%   2.6%
Carr-Andrighetto 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 13.3% 10.7%   2.6%
Totals   84.9% 0.3% 14.8%
32 Flynn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Andrighetto 83.2% 83.2%    
Pacioretty-Radulov 8.6% 8.6%    
Carr-Gallagher 3.1% 2.4% 0.7%  
Byron 2.4%     2.4%
Lehkonen-Shaw 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 1.9% 1.7%   0.3%
Totals   96.7% 0.7% 2.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Gallagher 70.1% 70.1%    
Danault 8.4%     8.4%
Plekanec-Radulov 5.2% 0.9% 4.3%  
Mitchell 4.3%     4.3%
Plekanec-Gallagher 3.9% 1.7% 2.2%  
Others 8.2% 6.0% 0.5% 1.7%
Totals   78.6% 7.0% 14.4%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Flynn 87.0% 87.0%    
Carr-Danault 4.5% 4.5%    
Carr-Plekanec 2.9% 2.9%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.3% 2.3%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Flynn-Andrighetto 83.9% 83.9%    
Danault-Andrighetto 4.3% 4.3%    
Mitchell-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Flynn-Gallagher 3.1% 2.4% 0.7%  
Plekanec-Andrighetto 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   99.3% 0.7%  
47 Radulov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Plekanec 73.0% 73.0%    
Pacioretty-Flynn 6.1% 6.1%    
Byron-Plekanec 5.1% 0.9% 4.2%  
Pacioretty-Shaw 4.7% 0.3% 4.4%  
Pacioretty-Mitchell 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 7.6% 7.1% 0.5%  
Totals   90.8% 9.2%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Shaw 66.3% 65.9% 0.3%  
Mitchell 13.1% 2.4%   10.7%
Danault-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Danault 3.8% 1.1%   2.6%
Danault-Radulov 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 8.7% 8.3%   0.3%
Totals   85.9% 0.3% 13.7%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 80.2% 79.8% 0.4%  
Pacioretty-Radulov 6.6% 0.4% 6.2%  
Byron-Danault 4.1% 4.1%    
Danault 3.2%     3.2%
Lehkonen-Plekanec 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.9% 3.2% 0.7%  
Totals   89.5% 7.3% 3.2%
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Radulov 75.0% 75.0%    
Flynn-Radulov 6.3% 6.3%    
Plekanec 5.9%     5.9%
Shaw-Radulov 4.9% 0.3% 4.6%  
Mitchell-Radulov 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   89.6% 4.6% 5.9%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 81.0% 72.4%   8.6%
Markov 9.1% 0.2% 8.6% 0.2%
Beaulieu 6.6% 0.3%   6.3%
Petry 2.6% 2.6%    
Markov-Emelin 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   76.2% 8.6% 15.1%
20 Redmond
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 95.9% 95.8%   0.1%
Emelin 2.5% 2.5%    
Petry 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   99.9%   0.1%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 86.7% 77.4% 0.3% 9.0%
Beaulieu 8.3% 3.3% 0.5% 4.5%
Weber 3.2% 3.2%    
Redmond 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   85.7% 0.8% 13.5%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Redmond 82.9% 82.9%   0.1%
Weber 6.5% 0.3%   6.2%
Petry 6.5% 2.6% 0.4% 3.5%
Markov 2.9% 2.9%    
Emelin 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   89.8% 0.4% 9.8%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 92.4% 82.7%   9.8%
Markov 2.8% 2.8%    
Redmond 2.5% 2.5%    
Beaulieu 1.4% 1.4%    
Markov-Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   90.2%   9.8%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 82.0% 73.2% 0.3% 8.5%
Weber 10.7% 0.3% 10.2% 0.3%
Beaulieu 3.5% 3.5%    
Emelin 2.9% 2.9%    
Emelin-Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   80.7% 10.5% 8.8%
Back to main page