Game #23 - November 29, 2016 - Montreal 1 at Anaheim 2
Game #23 - November 29, 2016
  Montreal   1   at     Anaheim   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
14:22 11:54 2:28 0:00 E
41 Byron27 Galchenyuk47 Radulov
11:36 11:36 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen51 Desharnais65 Shaw
10:39 10:39 0:00 0:00 E
43 Carr17 Mitchell24 Danault
7:34 7:34 0:00 0:00 E
65 Shaw27 Galchenyuk47 Radulov
2:57 0:00 2:57 0:00 E
14 Plekanec67 Pacioretty
1:01 0:25 0:00 0:36 E
Others 11:51 7:24 0:35 3:52 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Emelin  6 Weber
16:21 15:29 0:00 0:52 E
79 Markov26 Petry
14:52 13:42 0:26 0:44 -1
45 Barberio  8 Pateryn
13:23 13:23 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  6 Weber
5:40 2:01 2:59 0:40 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
2:43 0:11 1:56 0:36 E
74 Emelin26 Petry
1:47 1:47 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov74 Emelin
1:44 0:41 0:17 0:46 E
Others 3:30 2:18 0:22 0:50 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
14TP
11BG
41PB
27AG
47AR
62AL
51DD
65AS
43DC
17TM
24PD
65AS
27AG
47AR
74AE
6SW
79AM
26JP
45MB
8GP
79AM
6SW
26JP
6SW
10 Perry - 15 Getzlaf - 67 Rakell 8:31 0:54 2:28 0:54   4:44 3:05 4:39   0:16
7 Cogliano - 17 Kesler - 33 Silfverberg 0:23 7:32 0:30 0:07   3:16 3:26 2:50 0:52  
37 Ritchie - 50 Vermette - 86 Kase 0:40 0:10 6:12 1:49   4:02 3:05 1:54 0:03 0:20
16 Garbutt - 48 Shaw - 21 Wagner     0:18 4:22   1:10 0:40 2:50 0:05  
17 Kesler - 15 Getzlaf - 10 Perry   0:17         0:58   0:31  
4 Fowler - 45 Vatanen 1:40 7:08 1:52 0:30 2:01 4:12 5:41 2:29 3:33 1:28
42 Manson - 47 Lindholm 5:58 1:16 4:22 1:10 0:13 6:00 4:20 2:13 1:49  
2 Bieksa - 53 Theodore 4:56 0:34 2:06 4:50 0:39 4:05 1:48 5:33 0:14 0:39
2 Bieksa - 4 Fowler   2:03 0:13     0:40 0:12 1:25    
47 Lindholm - 53 Theodore     0:27 0:30   0:11   0:57   0:36

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Plekanec 83.6% 69.3% 14.4%  
Plekanec-Shaw-Pacioretty 4.4% 4.4%    
Byron 4.1%     4.1%
Carr-Mitchell 1.8% 1.8%    
Lehkonen-Plekanec 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 4.3% 3.5% 0.8%  
Totals   80.8% 15.1% 4.1%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 76.6% 63.5% 13.2%  
Pacioretty 5.4% 2.2%   3.2%
Byron 4.6%     4.6%
Gallagher-Shaw-Pacioretty 4.0% 4.0%    
Desharnais-Radulov 2.2% 0.7% 1.5%  
Others 7.1% 5.6% 1.5%  
Totals   76.0% 16.2% 7.8%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Danault 72.5% 72.5%    
Byron 5.1%     5.1%
Danault 4.5%     4.5%
  3.8%     3.8%
Lehkonen-Desharnais 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 10.7% 9.1%   1.6%
Totals   85.0%   15.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Mitchell 80.9% 80.9%    
Mitchell 5.0%     5.0%
Lehkonen 4.5%     4.5%
Pacioretty 3.4%     3.4%
Carr-Galchenyuk 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   87.2%   12.8%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Radulov 64.8% 64.8%    
Shaw-Radulov 16.5%   16.5%  
Lehkonen-Radulov 5.3% 5.3%    
Byron-Radulov-Pacioretty 2.9% 2.9%    
Radulov-Shaw-Pacioretty 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 7.7% 7.7%    
Totals   83.5% 16.5%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Radulov 74.9% 74.9%    
Plekanec 5.6%     5.6%
Gallagher 4.5%     4.5%
Mitchell 3.4%     3.4%
Galchenyuk-Radulov-Pacioretty 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   86.4%   13.6%
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Danault 82.5% 82.5%    
Galchenyuk-Radulov 4.5% 4.5%    
Mitchell-Gallagher 3.5% 3.5%    
Galchenyuk-Danault 2.5% 2.5%    
Mitchell-Danault-Desharnais 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 4.5% 2.7%   1.8%
Totals   98.2%   1.8%
47 Radulov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Galchenyuk 62.5% 62.5%    
Shaw-Galchenyuk 15.9%   15.9%  
Lehkonen-Galchenyuk 5.1% 5.1%    
Galchenyuk-Byron-Pacioretty 2.8% 2.8%    
Galchenyuk-Shaw-Pacioretty 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 11.0% 8.0% 3.1%  
Totals   81.1% 18.9%  
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 84.2% 84.2%    
Byron-Radulov 3.6% 3.6%    
Plekanec-Radulov 3.3% 1.1% 2.2%  
Lehkonen-Mitchell 2.8% 2.8%    
Mitchell-Danault-Carr 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.5% 4.3% 0.1%  
Totals   97.6% 2.4%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Shaw 82.0% 82.0%    
Galchenyuk-Radulov 7.3% 7.3%    
Danault 3.2%     3.2%
Mitchell-Desharnais 2.7% 2.7%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 2.3% 2.2% 0.1%  
Totals   96.7% 0.1% 3.2%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Desharnais 66.6% 66.6%    
Galchenyuk-Radulov 18.4%   18.4%  
Gallagher-Plekanec-Pacioretty 4.7% 4.7%    
Galchenyuk-Radulov-Pacioretty 3.1% 3.1%    
Byron-Galchenyuk 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 5.7% 4.7% 1.0%  
Totals   80.5% 19.5%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 78.2% 64.8% 13.4%  
Plekanec 5.5% 2.3%   3.3%
Gallagher-Plekanec-Shaw 4.1% 4.1%    
Galchenyuk-Byron-Radulov 2.8% 2.8%    
Galchenyuk-Radulov-Shaw 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 6.6% 4.9%   1.7%
Totals   81.6% 13.4% 5.0%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 64.2% 60.8%   3.4%
Markov 22.3% 7.9% 11.7% 2.6%
Petry 10.7% 0.7% 7.6% 2.4%
Emelin-Petry 1.6% 1.6%    
Pateryn 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   72.3% 19.3% 8.4%
8 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 88.3% 88.3%    
Petry 5.6% 0.1%   5.5%
Emelin 4.5% 4.5%    
Weber 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   94.5%   5.5%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 69.7% 64.2% 2.0% 3.4%
Weber 12.7% 0.9% 9.1% 2.8%
Emelin 8.4% 8.4%    
Pateryn 4.0% 0.1%   3.9%
Barberio 3.3% 1.6% 1.7%  
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   77.0% 12.8% 10.2%
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 91.0% 91.0%    
Petry 4.8% 2.3% 2.5%  
Emelin 3.6% 3.6%    
Weber 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   97.5% 2.5%  
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 76.0% 72.0%   4.0%
Petry 8.3% 8.3%    
Markov 8.1% 3.2% 1.3% 3.6%
Pateryn 3.2% 3.2%    
Barberio 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   91.1% 1.3% 7.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 66.8% 61.5% 1.9% 3.3%
Weber 25.4% 9.1% 13.4% 3.0%
Emelin 7.8% 3.1% 1.3% 3.4%
Totals   73.7% 16.6% 9.7%

Back to main page