Game #69 - March 12, 2016 - Minnesota 4 at Montreal 1
Game #69 - March 12, 2016
  Minnesota   4   at     Montreal   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty27 Galchenyuk42 Andrighetto
 17:21 15:34 1:47 0:00 E
54 Hudon14 Plekanec41 Byron
 6:17 6:17 0:00 0:00 E
25 De la Rose34 McCarron17 Mitchell
 5:00 5:00 0:00 0:00 -1
41 Byron14 Plekanec17 Mitchell
 4:21 4:21 0:00 0:00 E
53 Lessio24 Danault13 Brown
 3:45 3:45 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon34 McCarron53 Lessio
 3:34 3:34 0:00 0:00 E
25 De la Rose24 Danault13 Brown
 3:18 3:18 0:00 0:00 E
17 Mitchell25 De la Rose
 1:54 0:00 0:00 1:54 E
54 Hudon14 Plekanec34 McCarron
 1:46 0:00 1:46 0:00 E
54 Hudon24 Danault53 Lessio
 1:33 1:33 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec41 Byron
 1:08 0:00 0:00 1:08 E
Others 10:03 8:45 0:27 0:51 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov45 Barberio
 23:55 18:50 3:00 2:05 -1
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 16:23 14:22 0:16 1:45 -2
20 Bartley44 Dietz
 10:03 10:03 0:00 0:00 E
20 Bartley  6 Pateryn
 3:18 3:18 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin44 Dietz
 2:18 2:18 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin45 Barberio
 1:01 0:34 0:27 0:00 E
Others 3:02 2:42 0:17 0:03 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
27AG
42SA		 54CH
14TP
41PB		 25JD
34MM
17TM		 41PB
14TP
17TM		 53LL
24PD
13MB		 54CH
34MM
53LL		 25JD
24PD
13MB		 79AM
45MB		 74AE
6GP		 20VB
44DD		 20VB
6GP		 74AE
44DD
11 Parise - 9 Koivu - 3 Coyle 4:54 2:28 0:29 0:43   1:49   11:06 3:52 0:03    
14 Fontaine - 56 Haula - 22 Niederreiter 5:26 0:08 0:51 0:03 1:42 0:22 0:22 2:48 2:48 2:22 0:31 0:32
26 Vanek - 64 Granlund - 10 Schroeder 0:16 0:41 1:46 0:29 0:54 0:23 1:50 1:56 2:59 2:34 1:00 0:12
18 Carter - 19 Stoll - 12 Jones 0:59 1:06 0:48 2:00 0:45 0:12 0:54 0:23 3:01 1:58 1:28 0:44
20 Suter - 46 Spurgeon 7:15 1:51 0:37 2:19 1:09 0:40 0:35 7:25 6:43 2:57 0:33 0:07
25 Brodin - 39 Prosser 3:29 2:16 1:40 0:39 0:32 1:03 0:08 6:14 2:31 2:02 0:46 0:45
6 Scandella - 24 Dumba 3:15 0:42 2:41   1:28 1:51 0:54 3:53 3:21 2:33 1:05 0:30
20 Suter - 24 Dumba 0:38 0:13   0:33 0:06     1:56 1:08 0:07 0:35 0:14
6 Scandella - 25 Brodin 1:18 0:15         0:55 1:58 0:01 1:03   0:42
20 Suter - 25 Brodin 0:23 0:22   0:47     0:46 0:51 1:17 0:51 0:05  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Brown
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Danault 41.3% 41.3%    
De la Rose-Danault 36.3% 36.3%    
Lessio-Plekanec 7.9% 2.9% 5.0%  
De la Rose-Galchenyuk 5.3% 5.3%    
Hudon-Plekanec 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 6.2% 6.2%    
Totals   95.0% 5.0%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Byron 37.3% 37.3%    
Byron-Mitchell 25.8% 25.8%    
Hudon-McCarron 10.5%   10.5%  
Byron 6.7%     6.7%
Lessio-Brown 4.2% 1.6% 2.7%  
Others 15.5% 14.1%   1.4%
Totals   78.8% 13.1% 8.1%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-McCarron 33.1% 33.1%    
Byron-Plekanec 28.8% 28.8%    
De la Rose 12.6%     12.6%
De la Rose-Plekanec 4.3% 4.3%    
Lessio-McCarron 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 17.3% 14.1%   3.2%
Totals   84.2%   15.8%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Brown 35.3% 35.3%    
De la Rose-Brown 31.0% 31.0%    
Hudon-Lessio 14.6% 14.6%    
Lessio-Mitchell 4.9% 4.9%    
Byron-Mitchell 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 9.9% 8.6%   1.3%
Totals   98.7%   1.3%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Mitchell 37.7% 37.7%    
Danault-Brown 24.9% 24.9%    
Mitchell 14.3%     14.3%
Plekanec-Mitchell 4.9% 4.9%    
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 14.2% 13.2%   1.0%
Totals   84.7%   15.3%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 85.8% 77.0% 8.8%  
De la Rose-Mitchell 2.6% 2.6%    
De la Rose-Brown 2.4% 2.4%    
McCarron-Andrighetto-Pacioretty 1.7% 1.7%    
De la Rose-Andrighetto 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 6.1% 6.1%    
Totals   91.2% 8.8%  
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Mitchell 40.1% 40.1%    
Hudon-Lessio 28.6% 28.6%    
Hudon-Plekanec 14.2%   14.2%  
Lessio-Mitchell 4.8% 4.8%    
De la Rose-Andrighetto 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 9.3% 9.3%    
Totals   85.8% 14.2%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Plekanec 42.8% 42.8%    
Plekanec-Mitchell 29.7% 29.7%    
Plekanec 7.7%     7.7%
Pacioretty-Plekanec 3.5% 3.5%    
Mitchell 3.3%     3.3%
Others 13.0% 13.0%    
Totals   89.0%   11.0%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 91.6% 82.1% 9.4%  
De la Rose-McCarron 2.0% 2.0%    
Galchenyuk-McCarron-Pacioretty 1.8% 1.8%    
De la Rose-Galchenyuk 1.5% 1.5%    
Plekanec-Byron 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   90.6% 9.4%  
53 Lessio
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Brown 33.3% 33.3%    
Hudon-McCarron 31.7% 31.7%    
Hudon-Danault 13.8% 13.8%    
Plekanec-Brown 6.4% 2.4% 4.0%  
McCarron-Mitchell 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 9.6% 9.6%    
Totals   96.0% 4.0%  
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Byron 43.5% 43.5%    
McCarron-Lessio 24.7% 24.7%    
Plekanec-McCarron 12.2%   12.2%  
Danault-Lessio 10.7% 10.7%    
McCarron-Pacioretty 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   87.8% 12.2%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 89.0% 79.8% 9.1%  
Plekanec-Byron 2.6% 2.6%    
Galchenyuk-McCarron-Andrighetto 1.8% 1.8%    
Hudon-McCarron 1.4% 1.4%    
Plekanec 1.2%     1.2%
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   89.7% 9.1% 1.2%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 81.4% 71.4% 1.3% 8.7%
Bartley 16.4% 16.4%    
Barberio 1.9% 1.9%    
Markov 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   90.0% 1.3% 8.7%
20 Bartley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 68.6% 68.6%    
Pateryn 22.5% 22.5%    
Markov 5.2% 5.2%    
Emelin 3.3% 3.3%    
Barberio 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
44 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bartley 77.2% 77.2%    
Emelin 17.7% 17.7%    
Markov 5.1% 5.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 94.3% 74.2% 11.8% 8.2%
Emelin 4.0% 2.2% 1.8%  
Pateryn 1.5% 1.5%    
Bartley 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   78.2% 13.6% 8.2%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 78.7% 69.0% 1.3% 8.4%
Dietz 11.0% 11.0%    
Barberio 4.9% 2.7% 2.2%  
Markov 3.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.2%
Bartley 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   86.5% 4.8% 8.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 91.9% 72.3% 11.5% 8.0%
Bartley 2.9% 2.9%    
Dietz 2.6% 2.6%    
Emelin 2.4% 1.2% 1.1% 0.2%
Pateryn 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   79.2% 12.6% 8.2%
Back to main page