Game #04 - September 26, 2015 - Montreal 1 at Toronto 0
Game #04 - September 26, 2015
  Montreal   1   at     Toronto   0
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
15 Fleischmann51 Desharnais22 Weise
 14:33 11:17 3:16 0:00 +1
43 Carr25 De la Rose21 Smith-Pelly
 9:25 7:58 1:27 0:00 E
42 Andrighetto34 McCarron  8 Kassian
 7:28 6:56 0:32 0:00 E
47 Gregoire52 Holloway20 Thomas
 7:24 7:22 0:02 0:00 E
21 Smith-Pelly25 De la Rose
 2:13 0:46 0:00 1:27 E
15 Fleischmann51 Desharnais  8 Kassian
 1:16 0:32 0:44 0:00 E
21 Smith-Pelly34 McCarron42 Andrighetto
 1:14 0:09 1:05 0:00 E
  8 Kassian25 De la Rose42 Andrighetto
 1:05 0:00 1:05 0:00 E
15 Fleischmann22 Weise
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
34 McCarron43 Carr
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 13:22 8:58 2:50 1:34 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
45 Barberio44 Dietz
 20:28 14:51 4:55 0:42 +1
24 Tinordi  6 Pateryn
 16:29 12:43 0:13 3:33 E
71 Hanley85 Ellis
 8:21 8:21 0:00 0:00 E
71 Hanley  6 Pateryn
 4:24 1:19 3:05 0:00 E
24 Tinordi85 Ellis
 3:51 3:39 0:12 0:00 E
45 Barberio85 Ellis
 1:33 0:47 0:00 0:46 E
45 Barberio
 1:05 0:00 1:05 0:00 E
44 Dietz  6 Pateryn
 1:01 0:10 0:51 0:00 E
Others 2:48 2:08 0:40 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 15TF
51DD
22DW		 43DC
25JD
21DS		 42SA
34MM
8ZK		 47JG
52BH
20CT		 21DS
25JD		 45MB
44DD		 24JT
6GP		 71JH
85ME		 71JH
6GP		 24JT
85ME
11 Hyman - 62 Nylander - 71 Kapanen 3:11 0:26 1:00 1:40   1:48 2:29 1:06   1:24
20 Setoguchi - 42 Bozak - 21 Van Riemsdyk 3:08 0:24 1:10 1:55   1:41 2:32 1:49 0:04 0:31
23 Matthias - 24 Holland - 29 Boyes 1:34 3:08 0:21 0:44   4:03 1:44 0:44   0:05
28 Glencross - 23 Matthias 0:21 1:23 0:05 0:11   1:02     1:02 0:11
11 Hyman - 62 Nylander - 47 Komarov 0:43 0:29 0:59 0:08   1:03 1:01 0:31    
28 Glencross - 56 Froese - 71 Kapanen 0:24 0:48 0:42 0:36   1:24 0:24 0:42    
20 Setoguchi - 21 Van Riemsdyk - 24 Holland - 42 Bozak         0:30 0:24 1:57      
28 Glencross - 56 Froese - 47 Komarov   0:51 0:11 0:12 0:12 1:25 0:11 0:35    
21 Van Riemsdyk - 42 Bozak - 47 Komarov 0:13 0:23 0:18 0:28   0:15 1:02 0:20   0:28
11 Hyman - 62 Nylander - 29 Boyes - 71 Kapanen       0:02 0:23   1:07      
12 Robidas - 51 Gardiner 8:39 1:12 0:56 1:00 0:12 7:52 3:42 1:18 1:25 0:26
46 Polak - 52 Marincin 1:25 4:15 0:57 1:33   5:16 2:58 2:03 2:21  
25 Brennan - 54 Fraser 0:51 1:24 1:44 2:32   1:41 1:47 2:38 0:21 1:07
25 Brennan - 51 Gardiner 1:31 0:31 1:09 0:03   1:58 1:05 0:03   0:48
25 Brennan         1:22 0:36 2:56      
25 Brennan - 46 Polak 0:10 0:03 1:24 0:18   0:45 0:20 0:40 0:04 0:48
12 Robidas - 52 Marincin 0:28 0:39 0:11 0:11 0:39 0:49 0:38 0:33    
46 Polak - 51 Gardiner 1:04 0:20   0:02   0:22 0:34   0:01  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Kassian
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Andrighetto-McCarron 62.7% 58.3% 4.5%  
Fleischmann-Desharnais 10.6% 4.5% 6.2%  
De la Rose-Andrighetto 9.1%   9.1%  
Carr-De la Rose 6.3% 6.3%    
Andrighetto-Holloway 3.9% 2.5% 1.4%  
Others 7.3% 6.4% 0.8%  
Totals   78.0% 22.0%  
15 Fleischmann
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Weise 71.0% 55.0% 15.9%  
Desharnais-Kassian 6.2% 2.6% 3.6%  
Weise 4.9%     4.9%
Desharnais-Thomas 4.1% 1.0% 3.1%  
Desharnais 3.7% 1.8% 1.9%  
Others 10.2% 5.8% 1.9% 2.6%
Totals   66.2% 26.3% 7.5%
20 Thomas
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Gregoire-Holloway 67.9% 67.6% 0.3%  
Holloway 8.4% 8.4%    
Smith-Pelly-De la Rose 8.0% 4.1% 3.8%  
Fleischmann-Desharnais 7.6% 1.8% 5.8%  
Fleischmann-Smith-Pelly 2.6%   2.6%  
Others 5.5% 5.5%    
Totals   87.5% 12.5%  
21 Smith-Pelly
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-De la Rose 55.0% 46.5% 8.5%  
De la Rose 12.9% 4.5%   8.5%
McCarron-Andrighetto 7.2% 0.9% 6.3%  
De la Rose-Thomas 5.1% 2.6% 2.4%  
Carr-McCarron 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 15.7% 14.0% 1.7%  
Totals   72.7% 18.9% 8.5%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Fleischmann-Desharnais 81.0% 62.8% 18.2%  
Fleischmann 5.6%     5.6%
De la Rose 4.3%     4.3%
Smith-Pelly-De la Rose 2.8% 2.8%    
Fleischmann-McCarron 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 4.5% 3.6% 0.6% 0.4%
Totals   71.1% 18.7% 10.2%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Smith-Pelly 55.6% 47.0% 8.6%  
Smith-Pelly 13.1% 4.5%   8.6%
Kassian-Andrighetto 6.4%   6.4%  
Smith-Pelly-Thomas 5.1% 2.7% 2.5%  
Weise 4.5%     4.5%
Others 15.3% 14.9%   0.4%
Totals   69.1% 17.4% 13.5%
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Andrighetto-Kassian 57.7% 53.6% 4.1%  
Smith-Pelly-Andrighetto 9.5% 1.2% 8.4%  
Carr 7.7%     7.7%
Andrighetto-Carr 6.6%   6.6%  
Carr-Smith-Pelly 5.5% 5.5%    
Others 12.9% 7.2%   5.7%
Totals   67.5% 19.1% 13.4%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Kassian 60.0% 55.7% 4.3%  
Smith-Pelly-McCarron 9.9% 1.2% 8.7%  
Kassian-De la Rose 8.7%   8.7%  
McCarron-Carr 6.8%   6.8%  
De la Rose-Smith-Pelly 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 10.4% 9.1% 1.3%  
Totals   70.1% 29.9%  
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Smith-Pelly 68.2% 57.7% 10.5%  
McCarron 7.2%     7.2%
Andrighetto-McCarron 6.2%   6.2%  
De la Rose-Kassian 5.4% 5.4%    
McCarron-Smith-Pelly 5.2% 5.2%    
Others 7.7% 7.2%   0.5%
Totals   75.6% 16.7% 7.7%
47 Gregoire
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Holloway-Thomas 86.5% 86.2% 0.4%  
Carr-Holloway 5.1% 5.1%    
McCarron-Kassian 2.3% 2.3%    
Desharnais-Weise 1.8% 1.8%    
Holloway-Kassian 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   99.6% 0.4%  
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Fleischmann-Weise 76.3% 59.2% 17.1%  
Fleischmann-Kassian 6.6% 2.8% 3.8%  
Fleischmann-Thomas 4.4% 1.0% 3.3%  
Fleischmann 3.9% 1.9% 2.0%  
Andrighetto-Kassian 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 6.4% 5.9% 0.5%  
Totals   73.2% 26.8%  
52 Holloway
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Gregoire-Thomas 71.7% 71.4% 0.3%  
Thomas 8.9% 8.9%    
Andrighetto-Kassian 4.5% 2.9% 1.6%  
Carr-Gregoire 4.2% 4.2%    
McCarron 3.2% 1.9%   1.3%
Others 7.4% 7.4%    
Totals   96.8% 1.9% 1.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Tinordi 72.7% 56.1% 1.0% 15.7%
Hanley 19.4% 5.8% 13.6%  
Dietz 4.5% 0.7% 3.8%  
Barberio 2.1% 0.9% 1.3%  
Ellis 1.2% 1.3%    
Totals   64.8% 19.6% 15.7%
24 Tinordi
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 78.1% 60.2% 1.0% 16.8%
Ellis 18.2% 17.3% 0.9%  
Dietz 3.2% 3.2%    
Barberio 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   81.2% 2.0% 16.8%
44 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 89.4% 64.8% 21.5% 3.1%
Pateryn 4.4% 0.7% 3.7%  
Tinordi 3.0% 3.0%    
Barberio-Ellis 2.7% 1.0% 1.7%  
Barberio-Hanley 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   70.1% 26.9% 3.1%
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 82.1% 59.6% 19.7% 2.8%
Ellis 6.2% 3.1%   3.1%
  4.3%   4.3%  
Dietz-Ellis 2.5% 0.9% 1.5%  
Hanley 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.8% 1.7% 1.1%  
Totals   67.4% 26.7% 5.9%
71 Hanley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ellis 62.4% 62.4%    
Pateryn 32.9% 9.8% 23.0%  
Barberio 3.9% 3.9%    
Barberio-Dietz 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   77.0% 23.0%  
85 Ellis
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hanley 57.0% 57.0%    
Tinordi 26.3% 24.9% 1.4%  
Barberio 10.6% 5.3%   5.2%
Barberio-Dietz 4.2% 1.6% 2.6%  
Pateryn 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   90.8% 4.0% 5.2%
Back to main page