Game #78 - April 4, 2009 - Montreal 6 at Toronto 2
Game #78 - April 4, 2009
  Montreal   6   at     Toronto   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Tanguay11 Koivu27 Kovalev
12:21 8:38 3:43 0:00 E
70 Stewart15 Metropolit17 Laraque
8:55 8:55 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre  6 Kostopoulos
7:23 6:35 0:48 0:00 +1
21 Higgins14 Plekanec25 Dandenault
6:14 6:07 0:07 0:00 +1
21 Higgins15 Metropolit
5:01 0:00 0:00 5:01 E
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre27 Kovalev
3:02 0:15 2:47 0:00 E
  6 Kostopoulos40 Lapierre
2:41 0:00 0:00 2:41 E
21 Higgins14 Plekanec13 Tanguay
2:15 1:33 0:42 0:00 -1
21 Higgins14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
1:43 0:51 0:52 0:00 E
Others 10:25 7:38 0:29 2:18 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
12:24 10:24 1:46 0:14 -1
26 Gorges  8 Komisarek
8:58 5:36 0:09 3:13 E
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
6:59 6:10 0:07 0:42 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
6:15 3:00 1:01 2:14 +2
79 Markov71 Brisebois
5:27 2:31 2:56 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
4:00 3:44 0:00 0:16 E
79 Markov24 Schneider
3:49 0:59 2:50 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
3:30 2:24 0:22 0:44 +1
26 Gorges24 Schneider
2:20 2:20 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov25 Dandenault
1:54 0:33 0:00 1:21 E
44 Hamrlik25 Dandenault
1:06 0:00 0:00 1:06 E
Others 3:18 2:51 0:17 0:10 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13AT
11SK
27AK
70GS
15GM
17GL
84GL
40ML
6TK
21CH
14TP
25MD
21CH
15GM
84GL
40ML
27AK
6TK
40ML
21CH
14TP
13AT
44RH
71PB
26JG
8MK
79AM
8MK
44RH
26JG
79AM
71PB
79AM
26JG
79AM
24MS
44RH
8MK
26JG
24MS
23 Ponikarovsky - 84 Grabovski - 41 Kulemin     2:37 3:54 1:40   2:03 0:52 1:35 0:43 2:26 2:49 0:09 1:23 0:14 0:11 1:11
55 Blake - 39 Mitchell - 20 Hanson 2:29 2:22 0:40 0:13 2:07 0:03 0:15 0:41 2:14 2:24 1:45 0:17 0:53   0:33   0:10
10 May - 21 Mayers - 22 Devereaux 1:38 2:15 1:10 0:56         0:36 1:42 1:14 0:02 1:29   0:01 1:25 0:37
9 Hagman - 14 Stajan - 51 Hamilton 1:19 2:19 0:39   0:28 0:02 0:20   3:38 0:22 0:17 0:57       0:17 0:21
22 Devereaux - 21 Mayers 1:20         1:24   0:38 0:46 0:05     1:37   0:44 0:22  
55 Blake - 14 Stajan - 20 Hanson 0:59   0:32   0:30   0:01   0:55 0:44 0:08 0:01   0:05   0:32  
2 Schenn - 7 White 8:46 1:03 1:36 0:50   0:24     3:48 1:36 1:08 1:20 2:43 0:29 1:57 2:08 0:21
4 Finger - 43 Harrison 0:45 2:02   1:21 0:58 1:01 0:22   0:46 1:29 0:34 0:31 2:36 0:40   0:14  
15 Kaberle - 77 Kubina   1:34 1:49 0:18 1:37   0:04 1:37 1:39 2:29 1:07 1:16   0:32   0:11  
4 Finger - 15 Kaberle 0:17 1:33 1:06 1:39   1:09     1:11 1:36 1:51 0:09 0:08 0:11 0:47 0:02 0:53
43 Harrison - 77 Kubina   1:57 1:38 1:26   0:02 0:11   1:39 0:14 0:36 0:37   0:45 0:14 0:03 0:56
7 White - 15 Kaberle 0:09   0:34   0:58   1:29   0:47 0:28   1:36   0:05     0:09
7 White - 43 Harrison     0:05   0:24 0:23 0:03 0:38 0:46 0:05   0:14   1:05   0:30  
2 Schenn - 4 Finger 1:20 0:30             0:55 1:01             0:01

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Lapierre 53.3% 47.5% 5.8%  
Lapierre 19.4%     19.4%
Stewart-Lapierre 4.8% 4.8%    
Latendresse-Plekanec 4.6% 4.6%    
Tanguay-Plekanec 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 13.7% 11.3%   2.4%
Totals   72.4% 5.8% 21.8%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tanguay-Kovalev 94.3% 65.9% 28.4%  
Tanguay-Dandenault 1.5% 1.5%    
Higgins-Dandenault 1.3% 1.3%    
Stewart-Laraque 1.1% 1.1%    
Tanguay 0.9%     0.9%
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   70.7% 28.4% 0.9%
13 Tanguay
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Kovalev 68.4% 47.8% 20.6%  
Higgins-Plekanec 12.5% 8.6% 3.9%  
Lapierre-Kovalev 5.2% 3.6% 1.6%  
Plekanec 5.2%     5.2%
Plekanec-Kostopoulos 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 5.6% 5.0%   0.6%
Totals   68.2% 26.0% 5.8%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Dandenault 43.9% 43.1% 0.8%  
Higgins-Tanguay 15.9% 10.9% 4.9%  
Higgins-Kovalev 12.1% 6.0% 6.1%  
Tanguay 6.6%     6.6%
Higgins-Metropolit 4.8% 4.8%    
Others 16.7% 12.9% 1.4% 2.4%
Totals   77.8% 13.3% 8.9%
15 Metropolit
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Stewart-Laraque 54.0% 54.0%    
Higgins 30.4%     30.4%
Latendresse-Laraque 4.5% 4.5%    
Higgins-Plekanec 4.1% 4.1%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 3.7% 3.4%   0.3%
Totals   69.3%   30.7%
17 Laraque
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Stewart-Metropolit 80.8% 80.8%    
Latendresse-Metropolit 6.8% 6.8%    
Stewart-Lapierre 5.4% 5.4%    
Higgins-Metropolit 1.7% 1.7%    
Kostopoulos-Plekanec 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.9% 3.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Dandenault 35.6% 35.0% 0.7%  
Metropolit 28.7%     28.7%
Plekanec-Tanguay 12.9% 8.9% 4.0%  
Plekanec-Kovalev 9.8% 4.9% 5.0%  
Lapierre 5.0%     5.0%
Others 8.1% 8.1%    
Totals   56.8% 9.6% 33.6%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Plekanec 51.2% 50.2% 1.0%  
Tanguay-Koivu 1.6% 1.6%    
Higgins-Koivu 1.4% 1.4%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 0.8% 0.8%    
Higgins-Metropolit 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   78.0% 1.0% 21.1%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tanguay-Koivu 66.4% 46.4% 20.0%  
Latendresse-Lapierre 16.3% 1.3% 15.0%  
Higgins-Plekanec 9.2% 4.6% 4.7%  
Tanguay-Lapierre 5.0% 3.5% 1.5%  
Tanguay-Plekanec 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.7% 0.6% 1.1%  
Totals   57.8% 42.2%  
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 43.6% 38.9% 4.7%  
Latendresse-Kovalev 17.9% 1.5% 16.4%  
Kostopoulos 15.8%     15.8%
Tanguay-Kovalev 5.5% 3.8% 1.7%  
Higgins 5.1%     5.1%
Others 12.0% 11.7%   0.3%
Totals   55.9% 22.8% 21.3%
70 Stewart
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Metropolit-Laraque 82.8% 82.8%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 6.2% 6.2%    
Lapierre-Laraque 5.6% 5.6%    
Metropolit-Kostopoulos 1.5% 1.5%    
Koivu-Laraque 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 58.6% 52.2% 6.3%  
Lapierre-Kovalev 24.1% 2.0% 22.1%  
Metropolit-Laraque 6.0% 6.0%    
Plekanec-Kostopoulos 5.0% 5.0%    
Metropolit-Kostopoulos 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 2.1% 0.5% 1.6%  
Totals   70.0% 30.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 44.8% 28.0% 0.7% 16.1%
Markov 34.9% 30.8% 0.6% 3.5%
Hamrlik 17.5% 12.0% 1.8% 3.7%
Dandenault 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   73.6% 3.2% 23.2%
24 Schneider
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 55.6% 14.3% 41.3%  
Gorges 34.0% 34.0%    
Hamrlik 10.4% 6.3% 4.1%  
Totals   54.6% 45.4%  
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 15.6% 4.5%   11.1%
Hamrlik 9.0%     9.0%
Gorges 7.9% 7.0%   1.0%
Brisebois 6.6% 6.6%    
Komisarek 4.7% 4.7%    
Totals   78.0% 1.0% 21.1%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 39.5% 24.7% 0.7% 14.2%
Hamrlik 27.5% 13.2% 4.5% 9.8%
Markov 17.6% 16.4%   1.2%
Schneider 10.3% 10.3%    
Dandenault 4.3% 3.7%   0.5%
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   69.2% 5.1% 25.7%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 51.6% 43.3% 7.4% 1.0%
Gorges 26.0% 12.5% 4.2% 9.3%
Komisarek 14.6% 10.0% 1.5% 3.1%
Dandenault 4.6%     4.6%
Schneider 3.0% 1.8% 1.2%  
Others 0.2%     0.2%
Totals   67.6% 14.3% 18.1%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 65.8% 55.2% 9.4% 1.2%
Markov 28.9% 13.4% 15.6%  
Dandenault 4.2% 4.2%    
Gorges 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   73.8% 24.9% 1.2%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 31.5% 27.8% 0.5% 3.2%
Brisebois 24.5% 11.3% 13.2%  
Gorges 18.0% 16.8%   1.2%
Schneider 17.2% 4.4% 12.8%  
Dandenault 8.6% 2.5%   6.1%
Others 0.2%     0.2%
Totals   62.8% 26.5% 10.7%

Back to main page