Game #61 - February 19, 2008 - N.Y. Rangers 5 at Montreal 6 (SO)
Game #61 - February 19, 2008
  N.Y. Rangers   5   at     Montreal   6     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 14:39 11:18 3:21 0:00 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu74 Kostitsyn
 12:28 12:28 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre25 Dandenault
 4:08 4:08 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit40 Lapierre73 Ryder
 3:44 3:44 0:00 0:00 +3
84 Latendresse22 Begin25 Dandenault
 3:34 3:34 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit22 Begin73 Ryder
 3:28 3:28 0:00 0:00 E
11 Koivu73 Ryder
 1:43 1:13 0:00 0:30 E
11 Koivu21 Higgins
 1:41 0:01 0:00 1:40 E
22 Begin74 Kostitsyn
 1:32 0:16 0:00 1:16 E
74 Kostitsyn27 Kovalev
 1:30 1:30 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:20 0:00 0:00 1:20 E
14 Plekanec46 Kostitsyn
 1:17 1:17 0:00 0:00 E
Others 13:56 7:38 1:55 4:23 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
 15:14 15:14 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
 14:28 13:42 0:00 0:46 -1
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
 13:20 12:48 0:00 0:32 +2
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
 5:58 1:04 0:00 4:54 E
79 Markov32 Streit
 5:23 1:14 4:09 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
 2:27 0:08 0:00 2:19 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
 2:20 2:20 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
 1:33 1:03 0:00 0:30 E
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
 1:21 0:28 0:53 0:00 E
79 Markov  3 O'Byrne
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 +1
Others 1:54 1:32 0:14 0:08 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Kostitsyn 62.3% 62.3%    
Ryder 8.6% 6.1%   2.5%
Higgins 8.4% 0.1%   8.3%
Ryder-Higgins 4.4%   4.4%  
Kostitsyn 2.8%     2.8%
Others 13.4% 6.8% 4.0% 2.7%
Totals   75.3% 8.4% 16.3%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 72.2% 55.7% 16.5%  
Kovalev 6.6%     6.6%
Kostitsyn 6.3% 6.3%    
Kostitsyn 3.5%     3.5%
Streit-Ryder 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 8.4% 8.4%    
Totals   73.5% 16.5% 10.0%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Kostitsyn 61.4% 61.4%    
Koivu 8.3% 0.1%   8.2%
Kostitsyn 4.4%     4.4%
Ryder-Koivu 4.4%   4.4%  
Begin-Ryder 3.4% 2.3% 1.1%  
Others 18.1% 16.5% 1.6%  
Totals   80.3% 7.1% 12.6%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 30.6% 30.6%    
Streit-Ryder 29.7% 29.7%    
Kostitsyn 13.1% 2.3%   10.9%
Higgins-Ryder 6.0% 4.0% 2.0%  
Higgins-Streit 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 15.1% 7.9%   7.3%
Totals   79.9% 2.0% 18.1%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Lapierre 43.1% 43.1%    
Latendresse-Begin 37.2% 37.2%    
Begin 4.9%     4.9%
Higgins-Lapierre 4.3% 4.3%    
Latendresse-Koivu 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 6.3% 6.3%    
Totals   95.1%   4.9%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 71.5% 55.2% 16.4%  
Kostitsyn 7.3% 7.3%    
Plekanec 6.5%     6.5%
Ryder-Koivu 2.6%     2.6%
Kostitsyn-Koivu 2.3%   2.3%  
Others 9.8% 8.1% 1.6%  
Totals   70.6% 20.3% 9.1%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Ryder 22.4% 22.4%    
Begin-Ryder 20.8% 20.8%    
Lapierre 5.1%     5.1%
Higgins-Begin 3.8% 3.8%    
Plekanec-Ryder 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   64.7% 30.2% 5.1%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 38.1% 38.1%    
Streit-Ryder 34.4% 34.4%    
Streit 7.8%     7.8%
Streit-Kovalev 4.0% 4.0%    
Higgins-Dandenault 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 11.8% 8.3%   3.5%
Totals   88.6%   11.4%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 83.2% 64.2% 19.0%  
Plekanec 7.3% 7.3%    
Koivu-Kovalev 2.7%   2.7%  
Lapierre-Kovalev 1.4% 1.4%    
Plekanec-Kostitsyn 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 4.3% 4.3%    
Totals   78.3% 21.7%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Lapierre 31.1% 31.1%    
Streit-Begin 28.8% 28.8%    
Koivu 14.3% 10.1%   4.2%
Koivu-Higgins 7.4%   7.4%  
Higgins-Begin 5.8% 3.9% 1.9%  
Others 12.6% 8.2%   4.4%
Totals   82.1% 9.3% 8.6%
74 Kostitsyn (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 63.0% 63.0%    
Begin 7.7% 1.3%   6.4%
Kovalev 7.6% 7.6%    
Higgins 4.5%     4.5%
Plekanec 3.5%     3.5%
Others 11.7% 8.8%   2.9%
Totals   81.6% 1.2% 17.3%
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Dandenault 46.4% 46.4%    
Begin-Dandenault 40.0% 40.0%    
Koivu-Kostitsyn 5.4% 5.4%    
Koivu-Dandenault 4.5% 4.5%    
Plekanec-Dandenault 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 90.5% 86.9%   3.6%
Markov 7.0% 7.0%    
Hamrlik-Komisarek 1.8% 1.8%    
Bouillon 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   96.4%   3.6%
8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 83.1% 78.7%   4.4%
Hamrlik 8.9% 6.0%   2.9%
Bouillon 4.9% 4.9%    
Hamrlik-O'Byrne 1.5% 1.5%    
Hamrlik-Bouillon 0.9% 0.1%   0.8%
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   92.0%   8.0%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 75.6% 75.6%    
Markov 12.2% 0.7%   11.5%
Hamrlik 11.6% 11.6%    
Bouillon-Komisarek 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   88.5%   11.5%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 32.3% 7.4% 24.9%  
Hamrlik 8.1% 2.8% 5.3%  
Totals   64.7% 30.2% 5.1%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 52.6% 50.5%   2.1%
Bouillon 23.5% 4.2%   19.3%
Gorges 9.2% 9.2%    
Komisarek 6.1% 4.1%   2.0%
Streit 5.3% 1.8% 3.5%  
Others 3.2% 1.8% 0.9% 0.5%
Totals   71.7% 4.4% 23.9%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 67.9% 67.9%    
Hamrlik 26.6% 4.8%   21.8%
Komisarek 3.8% 3.8%    
Hamrlik-Komisarek 0.7% 0.1%   0.6%
Gorges-Komisarek 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   77.6%   22.4%
74 Kostitsyn (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 2.0% 0.8% 1.2%  
Totals   81.6% 1.2% 17.3%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 62.0% 58.7%   3.3%
Streit 23.1% 5.3% 17.8%  
Gorges 10.5% 0.6%   9.9%
O'Byrne 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   69.0% 17.8% 13.2%
Back to main page