Game #57 - February 12, 2008 - Montreal 2 at Tampa Bay 3
Game #57 - February 12, 2008
  Montreal   2   at     Tampa Bay   3

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
14:52 11:30 3:22 0:00 -2
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
10:26 9:41 0:45 0:00 +1
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre74 Kostitsyn
9:27 9:27 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
6:41 6:41 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Higgins20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
2:04 2:04 0:00 0:00 E
11 Koivu27 Kovalev
1:36 0:43 0:00 0:53 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
1:33 0:48 0:00 0:45 E
84 Latendresse20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
1:30 1:30 0:00 0:00 E
46 Kostitsyn11 Koivu27 Kovalev
1:20 1:09 0:11 0:00 E
Others 10:31 8:09 0:00 2:22 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
16:35 15:03 0:05 1:27 -1
51 Bouillon  3 O'Byrne
10:16 9:23 0:00 0:53 E
26 Gorges71 Brisebois
6:42 6:23 0:19 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
5:17 1:34 3:43 0:00 E
51 Bouillon71 Brisebois
3:46 3:46 0:00 0:00 E
26 Gorges  3 O'Byrne
3:40 3:40 0:00 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
3:32 3:32 0:00 0:00 E
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
2:32 1:59 0:00 0:33 E
26 Gorges  8 Komisarek
1:28 1:28 0:00 0:00 E
26 Gorges32 Streit
1:12 1:12 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
1:06 0:16 0:00 0:50 -1
Others 3:54 3:26 0:11 0:17 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 57.1% 53.0% 4.1%  
Kovalev 8.8% 3.9%   4.8%
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 7.3% 6.3% 1.0%  
Latendresse-Ryder 4.8% 4.8%    
Latendresse-Kostitsyn 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 18.2% 13.0%   5.2%
Totals   84.9% 5.1% 10.0%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 75.1% 58.1% 17.0%  
Kovalev 7.8% 4.0%   3.8%
Lapierre-Kovalev 4.0% 4.0%    
Higgins-Kovalev 3.9% 3.9%    
Koivu-Kostitsyn-Kostitsyn 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 6.1% 4.6%   1.5%
Totals   77.7% 17.0% 5.3%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Dandenault 52.8% 52.8%    
Higgins-Dandenault 16.3% 16.3%    
Latendresse-Dandenault 11.9% 11.9%    
Dandenault 5.1% 2.2%   2.9%
Streit 4.5%     4.5%
Others 9.4% 9.4%    
Totals   92.6%   7.4%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 67.2% 62.3% 4.8%  
Smolinski-Dandenault 13.3% 13.3%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 4.9% 4.9%    
Plekanec-Kostitsyn-Kovalev 3.8% 3.8%    
Koivu 2.9% 0.3%   2.6%
Others 7.9% 4.8%   3.1%
Totals   89.5% 4.8% 5.7%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Smolinski 55.9% 55.9%    
Higgins-Smolinski 17.3% 17.3%    
Latendresse-Smolinski 12.6% 12.6%    
Smolinski 5.4% 2.4%   3.1%
Higgins-Koivu 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 5.0% 5.0%    
Totals   96.9%   3.1%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 68.2% 52.8% 15.5%  
Koivu 7.3% 3.3%   4.1%
Plekanec 7.1% 3.7%   3.4%
Kostitsyn-Koivu 6.1% 5.3% 0.8%  
Plekanec-Lapierre 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   76.2% 16.3% 7.5%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Dandenault 45.0% 45.0%    
Smolinski 3.8%     3.8%
Koivu 3.7%     3.7%
Lapierre-Kostitsyn 1.0% 1.0%    
Koivu-Ryder 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   66.2% 26.3% 7.5%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kostitsyn 84.8% 84.8%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 7.0% 7.0%    
Kostitsyn-Koivu 4.2% 4.2%    
Higgins 1.6%     1.6%
Streit-Kostitsyn 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   98.4%   1.6%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 79.2% 61.3% 17.9%  
Koivu-Kovalev 7.1% 6.1% 1.0%  
Plekanec-Koivu-Kostitsyn 3.2% 3.2%    
Plekanec-Higgins-Kovalev 3.1% 3.1%    
Smolinski 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 5.1% 5.1%    
Totals   81.1% 18.9%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 91.0% 84.4% 6.5%  
Latendresse-Koivu 7.7% 7.7%    
Streit-Koivu 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   93.5% 6.5%  
74 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Lapierre 75.5% 75.5%    
Latendresse-Koivu 5.6% 5.6%    
Plekanec-Koivu-Kostitsyn 4.8% 4.8%    
Koivu-Lapierre 3.7% 3.7%    
Latendresse-Smolinski 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 7.9% 7.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Kostitsyn 73.5% 73.5%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 11.7% 11.7%    
Koivu-Ryder 6.9% 6.9%    
Koivu-Kostitsyn 5.4% 5.4%    
Smolinski-Kostitsyn 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 68.9% 63.0%   5.9%
Gorges 24.6% 24.6%    
Markov 5.0% 3.1%   1.9%
Komisarek 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   92.2%   7.8%
8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 72.2% 65.5% 0.4% 6.3%
Bouillon 15.4% 15.4%    
Gorges 6.4% 6.4%    
Brisebois 3.8% 3.8%    
Markov-Gorges 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   93.3% 0.4% 6.3%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 39.5% 37.7% 1.9%  
O'Byrne 21.6% 21.6%    
Bouillon 14.9% 11.7%   3.2%
Komisarek 8.7% 8.7%    
Streit 7.1% 7.1%    
Others 8.2% 3.2%   4.9%
Totals   90.0% 1.9% 8.2%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 35.6% 10.5% 25.0%  
Gorges 8.1% 8.1%    
Brisebois 1.2%   1.2%  
Totals   66.2% 26.3% 7.5%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 51.1% 46.7%   4.4%
Brisebois 18.7% 18.7%    
Komisarek 17.6% 17.6%    
Gorges 12.6% 9.9%   2.7%
Totals   92.9%   7.1%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 53.5% 51.0% 2.5%  
Bouillon 30.1% 30.1%    
Markov 7.9% 7.9%    
Komisarek 7.1% 7.1%    
Streit 1.5%   1.5%  
Totals   96.0% 4.0%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 64.8% 58.8% 0.3% 5.7%
Streit 20.7% 6.1% 14.5%  
Gorges 4.3% 1.0%   3.3%
Brisebois 3.8% 3.8%    
O'Byrne 2.9% 1.8%   1.1%
Others 3.5% 3.5%    
Totals   75.1% 14.9% 10.0%

Back to main page