Game #42 - January 8, 2008 - Chicago 3 at Montreal 4 (OT)
Game #42 - January 8, 2008
  Chicago   3   at     Montreal   4     (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
15:04 12:22 2:42 0:00 E
84 Latendresse11 Koivu74 Kostitsyn
9:51 9:51 0:00 0:00 E
21 Higgins40 Lapierre73 Ryder
9:10 9:10 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit45 Locke  6 Kostopoulos
3:59 3:59 0:00 0:00 -1
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
2:16 0:00 0:00 2:16 E
84 Latendresse11 Koivu21 Higgins
1:37 0:00 1:37 0:00 E
74 Kostitsyn40 Lapierre73 Ryder
1:21 1:21 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit40 Lapierre
1:17 0:00 0:00 1:17 E
32 Streit  6 Kostopoulos
1:11 0:00 0:00 1:11 E
32 Streit11 Koivu74 Kostitsyn
1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
21 Higgins40 Lapierre
1:04 0:00 0:00 1:04 E
11 Koivu  6 Kostopoulos
1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 14:22 13:16 0:00 1:06 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
22:08 18:47 0:00 3:21 E
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
13:30 13:04 0:00 0:26 -1
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
13:22 12:07 1:15 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
4:20 1:16 3:04 0:00 +1
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
4:19 2:27 0:00 1:52 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
1:50 0:34 0:00 1:16 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
1:44 0:45 0:00 0:59 E
Others 2:05 2:05 0:00 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Locke 36.2% 36.2%    
Streit 10.8%     10.8%
Koivu 9.1%     9.1%
Latendresse-Koivu 8.5% 8.5%    
Streit-Lapierre 8.2% 8.2%    
Others 27.3% 22.1%   5.2%
Totals   75.0%   25.0%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kostitsyn 56.2% 56.2%    
Latendresse-Higgins 9.2%   9.2%  
Streit-Kostitsyn 6.3% 6.3%    
Kostopoulos 5.7%     5.7%
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 17.2% 17.2%    
Totals   85.1% 9.2% 5.7%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 76.6% 62.9% 13.7%  
Kovalev 11.5%     11.5%
Higgins 2.5% 2.5%    
Kostitsyn-Ryder 1.9% 1.9%    
Kostitsyn 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 5.5% 5.5%    
Totals   74.7% 13.7% 11.5%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Ryder 58.0% 58.0%    
Latendresse-Koivu 10.2%   10.2%  
Lapierre 6.8%     6.8%
Locke-Ryder 5.6% 5.6%    
Kostitsyn 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 15.4% 9.9%   5.5%
Totals   77.5% 10.2% 12.2%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 73.0% 59.9% 13.1%  
Plekanec 11.0%     11.0%
Koivu 4.5% 4.5%    
Kostitsyn-Koivu 3.3% 3.3%    
Higgins-Koivu 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 6.5% 5.3%   1.1%
Totals   74.8% 13.1% 12.1%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Locke-Kostopoulos 27.8% 27.8%    
Lapierre 8.9%     8.9%
Kostopoulos 8.2%     8.2%
Koivu-Kostitsyn 7.7% 7.7%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 6.3% 6.3%    
Others 10.9% 10.9%    
Totals   61.4% 21.4% 17.2%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 53.8% 53.8%    
Kostitsyn-Ryder 7.9% 7.9%    
Streit 7.5%     7.5%
Higgins 6.3%     6.3%
Streit-Kostopoulos 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 19.2% 18.6%   0.6%
Totals   85.6%   14.4%
45 Locke
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Kostopoulos 66.6% 66.6%    
Higgins-Ryder 14.8% 14.8%    
Kostitsyn-Ryder 5.6% 5.6%    
Kostitsyn-Kostopoulos 5.0% 5.0%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 86.3% 70.8% 15.5%  
Koivu-Kovalev 3.9% 3.9%    
Higgins 3.6% 3.6%    
Lapierre-Kovalev 1.7% 1.7%    
Locke-Kovalev 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   84.5% 15.5%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Lapierre 65.6% 65.6%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 9.7% 9.7%    
Higgins-Locke 6.3% 6.3%    
Streit-Lapierre 6.1% 6.1%    
Higgins 3.1%     3.1%
Others 9.2% 9.2%    
Totals   96.9%   3.1%
74 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Koivu 63.6% 63.6%    
Lapierre-Ryder 8.7% 8.7%    
Streit-Koivu 7.1% 7.1%    
Lapierre 3.3% 3.3%    
Plekanec-Ryder 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 14.7% 14.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Kostitsyn 70.2% 70.2%    
Koivu-Higgins 11.5%   11.5%  
Koivu-Kostopoulos 6.7% 6.7%    
Lapierre 2.5% 2.5%    
Locke-Kostopoulos 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 7.2% 7.2%    
Totals   88.5% 11.5%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 88.8% 75.3%   13.4%
Hamrlik 7.0% 3.0%   3.9%
Bouillon 3.8% 3.8%    
Markov-Bouillon 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   82.6%   17.4%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 86.2% 83.4%   2.8%
Hamrlik 11.7% 3.6%   8.1%
Markov 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   89.1%   10.9%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 30.2% 8.8% 21.4%  
Totals   61.4% 21.4% 17.2%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 62.0% 56.2% 5.8%  
Bouillon 20.0% 11.4%   8.7%
Gorges 8.5% 2.6%   5.9%
Komisarek 8.0% 3.5%   4.6%
Markov 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   75.1% 5.8% 19.1%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 70.3% 68.0%   2.3%
Hamrlik 22.5% 12.7%   9.7%
Komisarek 4.9% 4.9%    
Markov 1.5% 1.5%    
Markov-Komisarek 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   88.0%   12.0%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 99.3% 90.0% 9.3%  
Bouillon 0.4% 0.4%    
Markov 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   90.7% 9.3%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 80.3% 68.2%   12.2%
Streit 15.7% 4.6% 11.1%  
Gorges 1.2% 1.2%    
Hamrlik 1.1% 1.1%    
Bouillon 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   76.7% 11.1% 12.2%

Back to main page