Game #41 - January 5, 2008 - Washington 5 at Montreal 4 (OT)
Game #41 - January 5, 2008
  Washington   5   at     Montreal   4     (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
14:41 12:06 2:35 0:00 +1
21 Higgins40 Lapierre73 Ryder
9:57 9:57 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse11 Koivu74 Kostitsyn
9:09 9:09 0:00 0:00 +1
25 Dandenault28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
4:45 4:45 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse11 Koivu21 Higgins
2:32 0:04 2:28 0:00 E
21 Higgins40 Lapierre
2:05 0:07 0:00 1:58 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
2:00 0:43 1:17 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
1:58 1:26 0:00 0:32 E
11 Koivu21 Higgins
1:45 1:25 0:00 0:20 E
28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
1:09 0:00 0:00 1:09 E
32 Streit40 Lapierre
1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 10:26 8:56 0:00 1:30 -3
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
14:27 12:07 0:00 2:20 -1
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
12:30 11:49 0:41 0:00 E
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
9:43 9:43 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
5:51 2:35 0:03 3:13 E
79 Markov32 Streit
4:55 1:42 3:13 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
2:27 2:04 0:23 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
2:09 2:09 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
2:05 2:01 0:04 0:00 -1
44 Hamrlik74 Kostitsyn
1:56 0:00 1:56 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
1:55 1:55 0:00 0:00 +1
79 Markov51 Bouillon
1:42 1:22 0:00 0:20 E
26 Gorges  8 Komisarek
1:38 1:02 0:00 0:36 E
Others 0:09 0:09 0:00 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dandenault-Chipchura 64.6% 64.6%    
Chipchura 15.6%     15.6%
Plekanec 7.9%     7.9%
Dandenault-Lapierre 6.6% 6.6%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 3.4% 2.5%   0.9%
Totals   75.5%   24.5%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kostitsyn 48.5% 48.5%    
Latendresse-Higgins 13.4% 0.4% 13.1%  
Higgins-Ryder 10.6% 3.8% 6.8%  
Higgins 9.3% 7.5%   1.8%
Higgins-Kostitsyn 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 13.2% 10.3%   2.8%
Totals   75.6% 19.9% 4.6%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 75.6% 62.3% 13.3%  
Kovalev 10.1% 7.4%   2.7%
Koivu-Kostitsyn-Kovalev 3.4% 3.4%    
Kostopoulos 3.0%     3.0%
Dandenault-Kovalev 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 4.9% 3.9%   0.9%
Totals   80.0% 13.3% 6.7%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Ryder 48.3% 48.3%    
Latendresse-Koivu 12.3% 0.3% 12.0%  
Lapierre 10.1% 0.6%   9.5%
Koivu-Ryder 9.7% 3.5% 6.2%  
Koivu 8.5% 6.9%   1.6%
Others 11.1% 10.2%   0.9%
Totals   69.7% 18.2% 12.1%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 72.0% 72.0%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 8.8% 8.8%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 7.3% 7.3%    
Lapierre-Ryder 7.1% 7.1%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 4.8% 4.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 71.3% 58.7% 12.5%  
Plekanec 9.5% 7.0%   2.6%
Plekanec-Koivu-Kostitsyn 3.2% 3.2%    
Dandenault-Plekanec 2.8% 2.8%    
Higgins-Lapierre 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 10.4% 10.2%   0.2%
Totals   84.6% 12.5% 2.8%
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dandenault-Kostopoulos 69.3% 69.3%    
Kostopoulos 16.8%     16.8%
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 4.9% 4.9%    
Dandenault-Kovalev 4.6% 4.6%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   83.2%   16.8%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre 5.3%     5.3%
Lapierre-Kostitsyn 1.6% 1.6%    
Lapierre-Kovalev 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   73.9% 20.8% 5.3%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 60.0% 60.0%    
Higgins 12.6% 0.7%   11.9%
Streit 6.0%     6.0%
Higgins-Kovalev 3.3% 3.3%    
Dandenault-Kostopoulos 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 15.2% 14.4%   0.8%
Totals   81.3%   18.7%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 83.7% 68.9% 14.7%  
Koivu-Kostitsyn 4.3% 4.3%    
Lapierre-Ryder 2.5% 2.5%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 1.9% 1.9%    
Kostitsyn 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 6.0% 6.0%    
Totals   85.3% 14.7%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Lapierre 73.5% 73.5%    
Higgins-Koivu 14.8% 5.3% 9.5%  
Koivu 3.6%     3.6%
Dandenault-Lapierre 3.4% 3.4%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 1.5% 0.5%   1.0%
Totals   86.0% 9.5% 4.6%
74 Kostitsyn (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Koivu 62.7% 62.7%    
Higgins-Koivu 6.6% 6.6%    
Kostitsyn-Koivu 5.1% 5.1%    
Plekanec-Koivu-Kovalev 4.6% 4.6%    
Latendresse-Plekanec 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 5.4% 5.4%    
Totals   86.7% 13.3%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Kostitsyn 70.7% 70.7%    
Koivu-Higgins 19.6% 0.5% 19.0%  
Lapierre-Kovalev 3.5% 3.5%    
Plekanec-Kostitsyn 2.6% 2.6%    
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 2.7% 2.2%   0.5%
Totals   80.4% 19.0% 0.5%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 69.4% 58.2%   11.2%
Bouillon 11.8% 9.9% 1.8%  
Hamrlik 10.3% 10.3%    
Gorges 7.8% 5.0%   2.9%
Markov-Gorges 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   84.1% 1.8% 14.1%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 62.7% 62.7%    
Hamrlik 13.4% 13.0% 0.4%  
Markov 12.4% 12.4%    
Komisarek 10.5% 6.7%   3.9%
Markov-Komisarek 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   95.7% 0.4% 3.9%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 66.6% 63.0% 3.6%  
Markov 26.2% 9.1% 17.1%  
Totals   73.9% 20.8% 5.3%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 51.0% 48.2% 2.8%  
Bouillon 23.9% 10.5% 0.2% 13.1%
Komisarek 8.8% 8.8%    
Gorges 8.5% 8.2% 0.3%  
Kostitsyn 7.9%   7.9%  
Totals   75.7% 11.1% 13.1%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 49.3% 49.3%    
Hamrlik 29.7% 13.1% 0.3% 16.3%
Komisarek 12.4% 10.5% 1.9%  
Markov 8.6% 6.9%   1.7%
Totals   79.8% 2.2% 18.0%
74 Kostitsyn (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 13.3%   13.3%  
Totals   86.7% 13.3%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 62.5% 52.4%   10.1%
Streit 21.3% 7.3% 13.9%  
Gorges 8.3% 8.3%    
Bouillon 7.3% 5.9%   1.4%
Gorges-Komisarek 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   74.6% 13.9% 11.5%

Back to main page