Game #30 - December 11, 2007 - Tampa Bay 3 at Montreal 2 (SO)
Game #30 - December 11, 2007
  Tampa Bay   3   at     Montreal   2     (SO)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
21 Higgins11 Koivu25 Dandenault
13:23 13:23 0:00 0:00 E
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
12:57 11:52 1:05 0:00 E
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre  6 Kostopoulos
7:20 7:15 0:05 0:00 E
32 Streit40 Lapierre  6 Kostopoulos
3:54 3:54 0:00 0:00 E
32 Streit28 Chipchura73 Ryder
3:18 3:18 0:00 0:00 E
11 Koivu21 Higgins
3:04 0:10 0:00 2:54 E
84 Latendresse28 Chipchura73 Ryder
2:04 2:04 0:00 0:00 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu27 Kovalev
1:56 0:00 1:56 0:00 E
32 Streit  6 Kostopoulos
1:36 0:00 0:00 1:36 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
1:13 0:37 0:00 0:36 E
73 Ryder11 Koivu21 Higgins
1:07 0:00 1:07 0:00 E
Others 13:08 9:54 0:00 3:14 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
18:42 14:43 0:05 3:54 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
10:39 10:26 0:00 0:13 E
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
8:54 8:17 0:00 0:37 -1
51 Bouillon71 Brisebois
6:09 6:09 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov51 Bouillon
4:30 3:15 0:00 1:15 E
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
4:16 3:09 1:07 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
4:11 1:50 0:00 2:21 E
79 Markov
1:56 0:00 1:56 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
1:24 0:19 1:05 0:00 +1
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
1:09 1:09 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:02 2:02 0:00 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Lapierre 47.7% 47.2% 0.5%  
Streit-Lapierre 25.4% 25.4%    
Streit 10.4%     10.4%
Higgins-Lapierre 4.9% 4.9%    
Plekanec 3.0%     3.0%
Others 8.6% 4.2%   4.3%
Totals   81.7% 0.5% 17.8%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Dandenault 56.9% 56.9%    
Higgins 13.0% 0.7%   12.3%
Higgins-Kovalev 8.2%   8.2%  
Ryder-Higgins 4.7%   4.7%  
Streit 4.0% 0.7%   3.3%
Others 13.0% 13.0%    
Totals   71.4% 13.0% 15.7%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 77.8% 71.3% 6.5%  
Kovalev 7.3% 3.7%   3.6%
Kostitsyn-Dandenault 4.1% 4.1%    
Higgins 3.7% 3.7%    
Kostopoulos 2.8%     2.8%
Others 4.3% 4.3%    
Totals   87.1% 6.5% 6.4%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Dandenault 55.4% 55.4%    
Koivu 12.7% 0.7%   12.0%
Koivu-Kovalev 8.0%   8.0%  
Ryder-Koivu 4.6%   4.6%  
Lapierre-Dandenault 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 15.9% 12.3%   3.6%
Totals   71.8% 12.6% 15.6%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 80.5% 80.5%    
Higgins-Lapierre 4.9% 4.9%    
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 4.1% 4.1%    
Chipchura 3.0%     3.0%
Streit-Koivu 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 5.5% 5.0%   0.5%
Totals   96.5%   3.5%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 71.3% 65.3% 6.0%  
Higgins-Koivu 10.6%   10.6%  
Plekanec 6.7% 3.4%   3.3%
Kostitsyn-Koivu 5.0% 5.0%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 4.2% 3.9%   0.4%
Totals   79.7% 16.6% 3.7%
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Ryder 45.1% 45.1%    
Latendresse-Ryder 28.2% 28.2%    
Higgins 8.4%     8.4%
Dandenault 6.8%     6.8%
Kostopoulos 4.6%     4.6%
Others 6.8% 4.1%   2.7%
Totals   77.4%   22.6%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 29.0% 29.0%    
Chipchura-Ryder 24.6% 24.6%    
Kostopoulos 11.9%     11.9%
Koivu 7.1% 1.2%   5.8%
Higgins-Koivu 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 9.8% 8.8%   1.0%
Totals   73.2% 8.1% 18.7%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 48.6% 48.1% 0.6%  
Streit-Kostopoulos 25.9% 25.9%    
Higgins-Dandenault 5.4% 5.4%    
Higgins-Kostopoulos 5.0% 5.0%    
Latendresse-Ryder 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 10.8% 10.8%    
Totals   99.4% 0.6%  
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 80.9% 74.2% 6.8%  
Koivu-Kovalev 5.6% 5.6%    
Plekanec-Dandenault 4.3% 4.3%    
Higgins 3.5% 3.5%    
Higgins-Koivu 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   93.2% 6.8%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Chipchura 40.4% 40.4%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 25.3% 25.3%    
Koivu-Higgins 13.7%   13.7%  
Latendresse-Lapierre 8.0% 8.0%    
Koivu 7.8% 7.8%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   86.3% 13.7%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 68.4% 67.7% 0.8%  
Chipchura-Ryder 19.3% 19.3%    
Lapierre-Ryder 6.1% 6.1%    
Lapierre-Kovalev 3.7% 3.7%    
Koivu-Dandenault 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   99.2% 0.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 85.4% 79.5%   5.9%
Bouillon 7.4% 7.4%    
Markov 7.2% 7.2%    
Totals   94.1%   5.9%
8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 61.0% 48.0% 0.3% 12.7%
Hamrlik 34.7% 34.0%   0.7%
Bouillon 3.8% 3.8%    
Markov-Bouillon 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   86.3% 0.3% 13.4%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 10.4% 2.4% 8.1%  
Hamrlik 2.6% 2.6%    
Totals   73.2% 8.1% 18.7%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 37.6% 36.8%   0.8%
O'Byrne 31.4% 29.2%   2.2%
Brisebois 15.0% 11.1% 3.9%  
Bouillon 14.8% 6.5%   8.3%
Streit 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   84.8% 3.9% 11.2%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 36.4% 36.4%    
Markov 26.6% 19.2%   7.4%
Hamrlik 24.7% 10.8%   13.9%
Komisarek 6.8% 6.8%    
O'Byrne 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   78.7%   21.3%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 53.2% 53.2%    
Hamrlik 36.9% 27.3% 9.7%  
Markov 9.8% 9.8%    
Totals   90.3% 9.7%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 65.4% 51.5% 0.3% 13.6%
Bouillon 15.7% 11.4%   4.4%
  6.8%   6.8%  
Streit 4.9% 1.1% 3.8%  
Brisebois 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   71.1% 10.8% 18.0%

Back to main page