Game #29 - December 8, 2007 - Carolina 5 at Montreal 1
Game #29 - December 8, 2007
  Carolina   5   at     Montreal   1

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
17:29 13:44 3:45 0:00 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
12:21 11:25 0:56 0:00 -1
32 Streit40 Lapierre  6 Kostopoulos
10:19 10:19 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
8:08 8:08 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Higgins11 Koivu27 Kovalev
2:03 0:22 1:41 0:00 E
Others 9:40 6:18 1:31 1:51 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
14:41 14:41 0:00 0:00 -2
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
11:37 10:24 0:00 1:13 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
9:15 5:18 3:57 0:00 -1
51 Bouillon71 Brisebois
4:47 4:47 0:00 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  3 O'Byrne
3:30 3:30 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
2:48 0:36 2:12 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
2:29 2:29 0:00 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
2:14 2:14 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov51 Bouillon
2:11 2:11 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
1:50 1:12 0:00 0:38 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
1:47 1:47 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  3 O'Byrne
1:07 1:07 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:44 0:00 1:44 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Lapierre 82.2% 82.2%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 4.8% 1.1% 3.7%  
Lapierre 3.6%     3.6%
Streit-Chipchura 2.9% 2.9%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 4.1% 2.1%   2.0%
Totals   90.7% 3.7% 5.6%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 71.5% 66.1% 5.4%  
Higgins-Kovalev 11.9% 2.1% 9.7%  
Latendresse-Dandenault 3.3% 3.3%    
Higgins 3.3%     3.3%
Latendresse-Higgins 3.2%   3.2%  
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   78.4% 18.3% 3.3%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 91.0% 71.5% 19.5%  
Dandenault 3.0%     3.0%
Latendresse-Kostitsyn-Ryder 2.2%   2.2%  
Kostitsyn-Ryder 1.1% 1.1%    
Higgins-Ryder 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 2.0% 1.6% 0.4%  
Totals   74.8% 22.1% 3.0%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 73.1% 67.6% 5.5%  
Koivu-Kovalev 12.1% 2.2% 10.0%  
Lapierre-Ryder 3.6% 3.6%    
Koivu 3.4%     3.4%
Latendresse-Koivu 3.3%   3.3%  
Others 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   77.9% 18.7% 3.4%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Chipchura 74.6% 74.6%    
Streit-Chipchura 7.2% 7.2%    
Plekanec 5.4%     5.4%
Latendresse-Koivu 5.2% 5.2%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   94.6%   5.4%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 83.9% 65.9% 18.0%  
Higgins-Koivu 9.8% 1.8% 8.1%  
Kostitsyn-Koivu 2.6% 2.6%    
Kostitsyn-Chipchura 1.9% 1.9%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   73.9% 26.1%  
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 76.1% 76.1%    
Streit-Dandenault 7.3% 7.3%    
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 3.7% 3.7%    
Streit-Kostopoulos 3.4% 3.4%    
Higgins-Ryder 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 6.6% 4.2%   2.3%
Totals   97.7%   2.3%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 65.4% 65.4%    
Chipchura-Dandenault 5.0% 5.0%    
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 2.3% 2.3%    
Plekanec-Kostopoulos 0.7% 0.7%    
Plekanec-Dandenault 0.5% 0.5%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   78.4% 21.6%  
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Kostopoulos 80.4% 80.4%    
Higgins-Ryder 4.8% 4.8%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 4.7% 1.0% 3.6%  
Latendresse-Dandenault 3.6% 3.6%    
Kostopoulos 3.5%     3.5%
Others 3.0% 3.0%    
Totals   92.9% 3.6% 3.5%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 88.3% 69.4% 18.9%  
Koivu-Kovalev 2.7% 2.7%    
Latendresse-Plekanec-Ryder 2.1%   2.1%  
Chipchura-Kovalev 2.0% 2.0%    
Koivu-Ryder 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 3.3% 2.9% 0.4%  
Totals   78.5% 21.5%  
73 Ryder (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 82.1% 75.9% 6.2%  
Higgins-Lapierre 4.1% 4.1%    
Latendresse-Plekanec-Kostitsyn 2.8%   2.8%  
Kostitsyn-Koivu 2.1% 2.1%    
Higgins-Chipchura 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   87.5% 12.5%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Dandenault 72.0% 72.0%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 5.3% 1.2% 4.1%  
Koivu-Dandenault 5.0% 5.0%    
Koivu-Higgins 4.9%   4.9%  
Lapierre-Dandenault 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 8.7% 4.3% 4.4%  
Totals   86.6% 13.4%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 76.1% 76.1%    
Bouillon 18.1% 18.1%    
Markov 5.8% 5.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 74.3% 66.5%   7.8%
Bouillon 14.3% 14.3%    
Hamrlik 11.4% 11.4%    
Totals   92.2%   7.8%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 17.8% 3.8% 14.0%  
Markov 5.0%   5.0%  
  2.6%   2.6%  
Totals   78.4% 21.6%  
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 62.3% 62.3%    
Streit 11.9% 2.5% 9.3%  
Brisebois 10.5% 10.5%    
Bouillon 7.8% 5.1%   2.7%
Komisarek 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   88.0% 9.3% 2.7%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 32.9% 32.9%    
O'Byrne 24.1% 24.1%    
Komisarek 15.4% 15.4%    
Markov 15.0% 15.0%    
Hamrlik 12.6% 8.3%   4.4%
Totals   95.6%   4.4%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 56.0% 32.1% 23.9%  
Bouillon 29.0% 29.0%    
Hamrlik 15.0% 15.0%    
Totals   76.1% 23.9%  
73 Ryder (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 3.5%   3.5%  
Totals   87.5% 12.5%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 45.6% 40.8%   4.8%
Brisebois 36.3% 20.8% 15.5%  
Bouillon 8.6% 8.6%    
O'Byrne 4.4% 4.4%    
Streit 3.1%   3.1%  
Others 2.1%   2.1%  
Totals   74.6% 20.7% 4.8%

Back to main page