Game #26 - December 1, 2007 - Nashville 5 at Montreal 4 (SO)
Game #26 - December 1, 2007
  Nashville   5   at     Montreal   4     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
32 Streit11 Koivu20 Smolinski
 11:20 11:20 0:00 0:00 E
21 Higgins14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 9:03 8:09 0:54 0:00 +2
84 Latendresse28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
 8:35 8:35 0:00 0:00 E
46 Kostitsyn54 Grabovski73 Ryder
 7:42 7:38 0:04 0:00 E
73 Ryder11 Koivu21 Higgins
 4:07 0:10 3:57 0:00 E
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 2:31 0:26 2:05 0:00 -1
32 Streit54 Grabovski20 Smolinski
 1:33 1:33 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Higgins14 Plekanec
 1:28 1:28 0:00 0:00 E
11 Koivu73 Ryder
 1:26 1:26 0:00 0:00 E
28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
 1:22 0:00 0:00 1:22 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:13 0:31 0:07 0:35 E
84 Latendresse28 Chipchura27 Kovalev
 1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec25 Dandenault
 1:03 0:00 0:00 1:03 E
84 Latendresse14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:03 0:10 0:53 0:00 E
Others 11:28 8:27 1:29 1:32 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
 18:01 16:20 0:38 1:03 +1
79 Markov71 Brisebois
 11:46 11:46 0:00 0:00 -1
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
 9:47 9:47 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
 8:25 3:36 4:25 0:24 +1
79 Markov32 Streit
 6:26 2:07 4:19 0:00 -1
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
 3:19 2:28 0:00 0:51 E
79 Markov51 Bouillon
 1:53 1:53 0:00 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
 1:43 1:43 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
 1:30 0:03 0:00 1:27 E
51 Bouillon71 Brisebois
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:02 0:08 0:07 0:47 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Smolinski 50.1% 50.1%    
Ryder-Higgins 18.2% 0.7% 17.5%  
Ryder 6.3% 6.3%    
Kovalev 4.1% 4.1%    
Streit-Kovalev 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 18.2% 11.1% 3.5% 3.6%
Totals   75.5% 20.9% 3.6%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Kovalev 52.7% 47.5% 5.2%  
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 14.7% 2.5% 12.1%  
Higgins 8.5% 8.5%    
Kovalev 7.1% 3.0% 0.7% 3.4%
Latendresse-Kovalev 6.1% 1.0% 5.1%  
Others 10.9% 4.8%   6.1%
Totals   67.3% 23.2% 9.5%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Koivu 67.9% 67.9%    
Streit-Grabovski 9.3% 9.3%    
Kostitsyn-Grabovski 5.9% 2.4% 3.5%  
Latendresse-Chipchura 3.7% 3.7%    
Latendresse-Koivu 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 9.7% 3.9%   5.8%
Totals   90.7% 3.5% 5.8%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 53.3% 48.0% 5.3%  
Ryder-Koivu 24.2% 1.0% 23.3%  
Plekanec 8.6% 8.6%    
Koivu-Kovalev 3.5% 0.9% 2.6%  
Latendresse-Koivu 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 7.3% 3.5% 0.4% 3.3%
Totals   65.1% 31.6% 3.3%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Chipchura 69.2% 69.2%    
Chipchura 11.0%     11.0%
Plekanec 8.5%     8.5%
Latendresse-Grabovski 4.2% 4.2%    
Streit-Koivu 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   80.5%   19.5%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Plekanec 47.6% 42.9% 4.7%  
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 13.2% 2.3% 11.0%  
Plekanec 6.4% 2.7% 0.6% 3.1%
Latendresse-Chipchura 5.8% 5.8%    
Latendresse-Plekanec 5.5% 0.9% 4.6%  
Others 21.4% 17.8% 2.7% 0.9%
Totals   72.4% 23.7% 3.9%
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 68.8% 68.8%    
Dandenault 10.9%     10.9%
Latendresse-Kovalev 8.8% 8.8%    
Latendresse-Smolinski 4.9% 4.9%    
Latendresse-Ryder 2.3% 1.9% 0.4%  
Others 4.3% 3.7% 0.5%  
Totals   88.1% 0.9% 10.9%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Smolinski 52.1% 52.1%    
Grabovski-Smolinski 7.1% 7.1%    
Koivu-Kovalev 3.3% 3.3%    
Smolinski 2.5%     2.5%
Plekanec-Kovalev 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   77.6% 19.8% 2.5%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Ryder 62.1% 61.6% 0.5%  
Plekanec-Kovalev 20.3% 3.5% 16.8%  
Grabovski-Smolinski 7.9% 3.2% 4.7%  
Kovalev 6.3% 6.3%    
Koivu-Ryder 2.2%   2.2%  
Others 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   75.8% 24.2%  
54 Grabovski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Ryder 67.2% 66.6% 0.6%  
Streit-Smolinski 13.5% 13.5%    
Kostitsyn-Smolinski 8.6% 3.5% 5.1%  
Latendresse-Dandenault 4.5% 4.5%    
Latendresse-Ryder 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Grabovski 53.8% 53.4% 0.5%  
Koivu-Higgins 28.8% 1.2% 27.6%  
Koivu 10.0% 10.0%    
Latendresse-Grabovski 2.1% 2.1%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 2.0% 1.6% 0.3%  
Others 3.3% 0.9% 2.3%  
Totals   69.2% 30.8%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Dandenault 60.7% 60.7%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 7.8% 7.8%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 7.4% 1.2% 6.2%  
Chipchura-Smolinski 4.4% 4.4%    
Koivu-Smolinski 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 15.7% 14.8% 0.8%  
Totals   92.9% 7.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 77.8% 70.5% 2.7% 4.5%
Markov 14.3% 10.6%   3.7%
Bouillon 7.4% 7.4%    
Hamrlik-Brisebois 0.5%   0.5%  
Totals   88.6% 3.2% 8.2%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 92.6% 92.6%    
Markov 7.4%     7.4%
Totals   92.6%   7.4%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 29.6% 9.7% 19.8%  
Hamrlik 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   77.6% 19.8% 2.5%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 63.9% 58.0% 2.2% 3.7%
Brisebois 29.9% 12.8% 15.7% 1.4%
Bouillon 5.3% 0.2%   5.1%
Streit 0.5% 0.5%    
Brisebois-Komisarek 0.4%   0.4%  
Totals   71.4% 18.3% 10.3%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 61.1% 61.1%    
Markov 11.8% 11.8%    
Komisarek 10.7% 10.7%    
Hamrlik 9.4% 0.3%   9.1%
Brisebois 7.1% 7.1%    
Totals   90.9%   9.1%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 54.9% 54.9%    
Hamrlik 39.3% 16.8% 20.6% 1.9%
Bouillon 5.3% 5.3%    
Hamrlik-Komisarek 0.5%   0.5%  
Totals   77.0% 21.2% 1.9%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 48.7% 48.7%    
Streit 26.6% 8.8% 17.8%  
Komisarek 13.7% 10.2%   3.5%
Bouillon 7.8% 7.8%    
Gorges 3.2%     3.2%
Totals   75.4% 17.8% 6.8%
Back to main page