Game #20 - November 19, 2007 - Ottawa 4 at Montreal 2
Game #20 - November 19, 2007
  Ottawa   4   at     Montreal   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
17:16 10:56 6:20 0:00 +1
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
11:26 9:27 1:59 0:00 -1
22 Begin28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
7:28 7:28 0:00 0:00 -1
84 Latendresse54 Grabovski20 Smolinski
6:45 6:45 0:00 0:00 -1
84 Latendresse14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
2:26 0:00 2:26 0:00 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu
1:56 0:00 0:00 1:56 E
28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
1:25 0:00 0:00 1:25 E
22 Begin25 Dandenault
1:14 0:00 0:00 1:14 E
28 Chipchura20 Smolinski
1:13 0:00 0:00 1:13 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski
1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 7:51 5:02 0:02 2:47 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
12:45 10:21 0:00 2:24 -2
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
12:18 10:18 2:00 0:00 -1
79 Markov32 Streit
8:23 3:42 4:41 0:00 E
51 Bouillon32 Streit
7:29 6:11 0:00 1:18 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
4:38 1:01 3:37 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
3:37 1:22 0:00 2:15 E
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
3:24 2:55 0:29 0:00 +1
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
3:12 2:25 0:00 0:47 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
3:08 0:28 0:00 2:40 E
Others 1:06 0:55 0:00 0:11 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 82.3% 52.1% 30.2%  
Higgins 9.2%     9.2%
Higgins-Plekanec 2.0% 2.0%    
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 1.4% 1.4%    
Higgins-Kostitsyn 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   60.6% 30.2% 9.2%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 68.3% 56.5% 11.9%  
Latendresse-Kovalev 14.5%   14.5%  
Kovalev 4.7%     4.7%
Ryder 4.4%     4.4%
Higgins 3.3%     3.3%
Others 4.8% 4.8%    
Totals   61.3% 26.4% 12.4%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Grabovski 66.1% 66.1%    
Chipchura 11.9%     11.9%
Begin 9.8%     9.8%
Higgins-Grabovski 3.9% 3.6% 0.3%  
Latendresse-Chipchura 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   78.0% 0.3% 21.7%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 80.5% 51.0% 29.5%  
Koivu 9.0%     9.0%
Plekanec 2.6%     2.6%
Koivu-Plekanec 1.9% 1.9%    
Grabovski-Smolinski 1.9% 1.7% 0.2%  
Others 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   58.7% 29.7% 11.6%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Dandenault 67.4% 67.4%    
Dandenault 11.1%     11.1%
Smolinski 9.0%     9.0%
Chipchura-Ryder 3.9% 3.9%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 6.2% 6.2%    
Totals   79.8%   20.2%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Chipchura 65.8% 65.8%    
Chipchura 12.5%     12.5%
Begin 10.9%     10.9%
Begin-Grabovski 2.2% 2.2%    
Kostitsyn-Chipchura 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 5.1% 5.1%    
Totals   76.7%   23.3%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 69.6% 57.5% 12.1%  
Latendresse-Plekanec 14.8%   14.8%  
Plekanec 4.8%     4.8%
Kostitsyn 4.4%     4.4%
Kostitsyn-Koivu 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.8% 4.8%    
Totals   64.0% 26.9% 9.1%
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Dandenault 62.0% 62.0%    
Dandenault 11.8%     11.8%
Smolinski 10.1%     10.1%
Begin-Ryder 3.6% 3.6%    
Latendresse-Smolinski 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 9.7% 9.7%    
Totals   78.1%   21.9%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 84.9% 70.2% 14.7%  
Kovalev 5.3%     5.3%
Koivu-Kovalev 2.1% 2.1%    
Higgins-Koivu 1.9% 1.9%    
Chipchura-Dandenault 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   80.0% 14.7% 5.3%
54 Grabovski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Smolinski 86.0% 86.0%    
Higgins-Smolinski 5.1% 4.7% 0.4%  
Begin-Dandenault 3.2% 3.2%    
Higgins-Koivu 1.9% 1.9%    
Kostitsyn-Smolinski 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   99.6% 0.4%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 89.9% 56.9% 33.0%  
Plekanec 3.8%     3.8%
Begin-Chipchura 2.3% 2.3%    
Begin-Koivu 1.0% 1.0%    
Latendresse-Koivu 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   63.2% 33.0% 3.8%
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Smolinski 68.6% 68.6%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 24.7%   24.7%  
Chipchura-Smolinski 3.6% 3.6%    
Koivu-Ryder 1.7% 1.7%    
Plekanec-Smolinski 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   75.3% 24.7%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 65.2% 52.9%   12.3%
Hamrlik 18.5% 7.0%   11.5%
Bouillon 16.4% 12.4%   4.0%
Totals   72.2%   27.8%
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik-Brisebois 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   76.7%   23.3%
32 Streit
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 43.5% 19.2% 24.3%  
Bouillon 38.8% 32.1%   6.7%
Hamrlik 17.6% 15.1% 2.5%  
Totals   66.4% 26.8% 6.7%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 53.4% 44.7% 8.7%  
Komisarek 15.7% 5.9%   9.8%
Streit 14.8% 12.7% 2.1%  
Bouillon 13.6% 2.0%   11.6%
Markov-Brisebois 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   67.9% 10.8% 21.3%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 52.2% 43.1%   9.1%
Komisarek 22.3% 16.9%   5.5%
Hamrlik 21.9% 3.3%   18.6%
Brisebois 3.6% 2.3%   1.3%
Totals   65.6%   34.4%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 68.2% 57.1% 11.1%  
Markov 25.7% 5.6% 20.1%  
Bouillon 2.9% 1.8%   1.0%
Markov-Hamrlik 2.3% 2.3%    
Hamrlik-Dandenault 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   67.8% 31.1% 1.0%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 48.7% 39.5%   9.2%
Streit 32.0% 14.1% 17.9%  
Brisebois 17.7% 3.9% 13.8%  
Hamrlik-Brisebois 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   59.1% 31.7% 9.2%

Back to main page