Game #15 - November 8, 2007 - Montreal 2 at Boston 1
Game #15 - November 8, 2007
  Montreal   2   at     Boston   1

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
14:03 12:51 1:12 0:00 E
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
12:25 11:49 0:36 0:00 +2
54 Grabovski20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
7:46 7:46 0:00 0:00 -1
22 Begin28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
7:12 7:12 0:00 0:00 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu  6 Kostopoulos
2:02 2:02 0:00 0:00 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
1:59 1:59 0:00 0:00 E
22 Begin25 Dandenault
1:18 0:05 0:00 1:13 E
27 Kovalev28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
20 Smolinski28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 10:58 5:56 0:12 4:50 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
22:16 20:56 0:00 1:20 -1
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
14:22 13:19 0:43 0:20 +1
51 Bouillon32 Streit
12:05 12:05 0:00 0:00 +1
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
3:16 3:11 0:05 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
2:41 0:44 1:12 0:45 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
1:35 0:00 0:00 1:35 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
1:07 1:04 0:00 0:03 E
Others 2:38 0:38 0:00 2:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Chipchura 55.2% 55.2%    
Higgins-Koivu 15.6% 15.6%    
Kovalev-Chipchura 9.3% 9.3%    
Begin 5.5%     5.5%
Chipchura 5.0%     5.0%
Others 9.5% 9.5%    
Totals   89.5%   10.5%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 71.9% 65.7% 6.1%  
Higgins-Kostopoulos 10.4% 10.4%    
Begin 3.7%     3.7%
Smolinski 3.7%     3.7%
Kostitsyn-Ryder 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 8.0% 7.8%   0.3%
Totals   86.3% 6.1% 7.6%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 90.9% 86.5% 4.4%  
Higgins-Kovalev 3.9% 3.9%    
Begin-Kovalev 3.9% 2.4% 1.5%  
Chipchura-Dandenault 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   94.1% 5.9%  
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Dandenault 54.4% 54.4%    
Begin-Dandenault 13.9% 13.9%    
Chipchura-Dandenault 7.5% 7.5%    
Koivu 5.0%     5.0%
Higgins-Dandenault 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 14.6% 5.6%   9.0%
Totals   86.0%   14.0%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 73.6% 67.3% 6.3%  
Koivu-Kostopoulos 10.7% 10.7%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 3.5% 3.5%    
Smolinski 2.8%     2.8%
Plekanec-Kovalev 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 6.6% 6.4%   0.3%
Totals   90.7% 6.3% 3.1%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 52.1% 52.1%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 14.4% 14.4%    
Dandenault 9.4% 0.6%   8.8%
Kostopoulos 5.2%     5.2%
Koivu 5.2%     5.2%
Others 13.8% 7.2% 1.4% 5.1%
Totals   74.3% 1.4% 24.2%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Smolinski 53.9% 53.9%    
Begin-Smolinski 13.8% 13.8%    
Begin 9.0% 0.6%   8.4%
Smolinski-Chipchura 7.4% 7.4%    
Higgins-Smolinski 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 6.5% 5.1%   1.4%
Totals   85.3%   14.7%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 78.5% 74.7% 3.8%  
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 7.7% 7.7%    
Begin-Plekanec 3.4% 2.1% 1.3%  
Higgins-Plekanec 3.4% 3.4%    
Kostitsyn-Chipchura 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 4.2% 4.2%    
Totals   94.9% 5.1%  
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Kostopoulos 58.1% 58.1%    
Kovalev-Kostopoulos 9.8% 9.8%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 8.6% 8.6%    
Kostopoulos 5.2%     5.2%
Smolinski 4.4%     4.4%
Others 13.7% 13.7%    
Totals   90.3%   9.7%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 87.9% 83.6% 4.2%  
Koivu-Ryder 3.3% 3.3%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 3.2% 3.2%    
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 3.1% 3.1%    
Koivu-Kovalev 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   95.8% 4.2%  
54 Grabovski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Dandenault 95.3% 95.3%    
Koivu-Dandenault 3.1% 3.1%    
Koivu-Ryder 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 92.1% 84.3% 7.9%  
Kostitsyn-Koivu 3.1% 3.1%    
Higgins-Smolinski 2.5% 2.5%    
Begin-Chipchura 1.1% 1.1%    
Grabovski-Koivu 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   92.1% 7.9%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 93.8% 88.2%   5.6%
Hamrlik 4.7% 4.5%   0.2%
Markov-Brisebois 1.1% 1.1%    
Hamrlik-Bouillon 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   94.2%   5.8%
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 4.9%     4.9%
Totals   85.3%   14.7%
32 Streit
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 67.0% 67.0%    
Hamrlik 18.1% 17.7% 0.5%  
Markov 14.9% 4.1% 6.7% 4.2%
Totals   88.7% 7.1% 4.2%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 66.9% 62.0% 3.3% 1.6%
Streit 15.2% 14.8% 0.4%  
Bouillon 7.4%     7.4%
Komisarek 5.2% 5.0%   0.2%
Dandenault 3.3%     3.3%
Others 2.0% 0.4%   1.6%
Totals   82.2% 3.7% 14.1%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 87.9% 87.9%    
Hamrlik 11.5%     11.5%
Hamrlik-Komisarek 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   88.5%   11.5%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 96.0% 89.0% 4.8% 2.2%
Markov 2.2% 1.9%   0.3%
Markov-Komisarek 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   92.7% 4.8% 2.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 84.2% 79.1%   5.0%
Streit 10.1% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8%
  3.4%     3.4%
Brisebois 1.3% 1.1%   0.2%
Brisebois-Komisarek 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   84.0% 4.5% 11.5%

Back to main page