Game #04 - September 21, 2007 - N.Y. Islanders 2 at Montreal 3 (OT)
Game #04 - September 21, 2007
  N.Y. Islanders   2   at     Montreal   3     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Kostitsyn11 Koivu73 Ryder
 12:58 9:12 3:46 0:00 -1
84 Latendresse14 Plekanec36 D'Agostini
 12:49 10:26 2:23 0:00 +1
22 Begin80 Maxwell  6 Kostopoulos
 11:22 11:17 0:05 0:00 E
57 Murray40 Lapierre54 White
 9:53 9:53 0:00 0:00 E
11 Koivu73 Ryder
 1:21 0:47 0:00 0:34 -1
84 Latendresse80 Maxwell36 D'Agostini
 1:17 0:21 0:56 0:00 E
22 Begin40 Lapierre  6 Kostopoulos
 1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
57 Murray14 Plekanec54 White
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse14 Plekanec  6 Kostopoulos
 1:03 0:58 0:05 0:00 +1
Others 8:41 6:44 0:35 1:22 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
 19:04 17:32 0:39 0:53 E
51 Bouillon25 Dandenault
 17:33 16:36 0:18 0:39 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
 15:07 14:43 0:00 0:24 E
79 Markov44 Hamrlik
 5:20 0:43 4:37 0:00 E
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
 2:03 0:14 1:49 0:00 +1
Others 2:38 2:11 0:27 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Maxwell 73.1% 72.6% 0.5%  
Begin-Lapierre 7.8% 7.8%    
Latendresse-Plekanec 6.8% 6.2% 0.5%  
Begin 6.2%     6.2%
Latendresse-Maxwell 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   92.7% 1.1% 6.2%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Ryder 78.7% 55.9% 22.9%  
Ryder 8.2% 4.8%   3.4%
Begin-Ryder 4.7% 4.7%    
Latendresse-Ryder 3.8% 2.5% 1.3%  
Kostitsyn-White 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 2.1% 1.4%   0.7%
Totals   71.7% 24.2% 4.1%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-D'Agostini 78.3% 63.7% 14.6%  
Murray-White 6.9% 6.9%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 6.4% 5.9% 0.5%  
Kostitsyn 5.0% 5.0%    
Maxwell-Begin 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   84.9% 15.1%  
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Maxwell-Kostopoulos 73.4% 72.9% 0.5%  
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 7.9% 7.9%    
Kostopoulos 6.2%     6.2%
Koivu-Ryder 5.0% 5.0%    
Lapierre-White 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   93.2% 0.5% 6.2%
36 D'Agostini
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Plekanec 85.3% 69.5% 15.9%  
Latendresse-Maxwell 8.5% 2.3% 6.2%  
Murray-Lapierre 1.9% 1.9%    
Latendresse 1.8% 1.8%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   77.9% 22.1%  
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Murray-White 71.7% 71.7%    
Begin-Kostopoulos 8.8% 8.8%    
Begin-White 5.0% 5.0%    
Latendresse-Murray 2.7% 2.7%    
Murray 2.1%     2.1%
Others 9.8% 8.9% 0.8%  
Totals   97.1% 0.8% 2.1%
54 White
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Murray-Lapierre 80.1% 80.1%    
Murray-Plekanec 9.2% 9.2%    
Begin-Lapierre 5.5% 5.5%    
Kostitsyn-Koivu 3.2% 3.2%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 1.9% 0.9% 0.9%  
Totals   99.1% 0.9%  
57 Murray
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-White 79.4% 79.4%    
Plekanec-White 9.1% 9.1%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 2.9% 2.9%    
Lapierre-D'Agostini 2.3% 2.3%    
Lapierre 2.3%     2.3%
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   97.7%   2.3%
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Koivu 76.7% 54.4% 22.3%  
Koivu 8.0% 4.6%   3.4%
Begin-Koivu 4.5% 4.5%    
Latendresse-Koivu 3.7% 2.5% 1.3%  
Kostitsyn-Maxwell 2.6% 1.1% 1.5%  
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   71.6% 25.0% 3.4%
74 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 84.6% 60.0% 24.6%  
Plekanec 5.3% 5.3%    
Maxwell-Ryder 2.8% 1.2% 1.6%  
Koivu-White 2.6% 2.6%    
Maxwell-Kostopoulos 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 3.5% 3.5%    
Totals   73.8% 26.2%  
80 Maxwell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Kostopoulos 80.7% 80.1% 0.6%  
Latendresse-D'Agostini 9.1% 2.5% 6.6%  
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 4.5% 4.5%    
Kostitsyn-Ryder 3.1% 1.3% 1.8%  
Kostitsyn-Kostopoulos 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   91.0% 9.0%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-D'Agostini 73.2% 59.6% 13.6%  
Maxwell-D'Agostini 7.3% 2.0% 5.3%  
Plekanec-Kostopoulos 6.0% 5.5% 0.5%  
Koivu-Ryder 3.6% 2.4% 1.2%  
Maxwell-Kostopoulos 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 6.2% 4.9% 0.7% 0.7%
Totals   78.0% 21.3% 0.7%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 92.9% 85.5% 3.2% 4.3%
Markov 3.3% 3.3%    
Bouillon 2.8% 2.3% 0.6%  
Markov-Hamrlik 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   92.0% 3.7% 4.3%
25 Dandenault
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 97.0% 91.7% 1.7% 3.6%
Hamrlik 3.0% 3.0%    
Totals   94.8% 1.7% 3.6%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 86.5% 84.3%   2.3%
Bouillon 11.7% 1.3% 10.4%  
Hamrlik 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   87.3% 10.4% 2.3%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 75.0% 68.9% 2.6% 3.5%
Markov 21.0% 2.8% 18.2%  
Dandenault 2.2% 2.2%    
Gorges 1.2% 1.2%    
Markov-O'Byrne 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   75.8% 20.7% 3.5%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dandenault 85.5% 80.9% 1.5% 3.2%
Gorges 10.0% 1.1% 8.9%  
O'Byrne 2.8% 2.3% 0.6%  
Markov 1.6%   1.6%  
Totals   84.3% 12.5% 3.2%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 69.8% 68.0%   1.8%
Hamrlik 24.6% 3.3% 21.3%  
O'Byrne 3.2% 3.2%    
Bouillon 1.5%   1.5%  
Hamrlik-O'Byrne 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   75.3% 22.9% 1.8%
Back to main page