Game #02 - September 18, 2007 - Pittsburgh 5 at Montreal 2
Game #02 - September 18, 2007
  Pittsburgh   5   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
84 Latendresse11 Koivu73 Ryder
 11:29 6:51 4:38 0:00 -1
63 Lemieux53 Urquhart54 White
 7:19 7:19 0:00 0:00 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski
 5:26 1:00 0:19 4:07 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski81 Beauregard
 5:00 3:50 1:08 0:02 -2
37 Manlow40 Lapierre36 D'Agostini
 4:47 4:11 0:36 0:00 -2
11 Koivu73 Ryder
 3:43 1:13 0:00 2:30 +1
36 D'Agostini40 Lapierre
 2:26 0:00 0:00 2:26 E
36 D'Agostini20 Smolinski81 Beauregard
 1:51 0:00 1:51 0:00 E
36 D'Agostini
 1:25 0:00 0:00 1:25 E
53 Urquhart54 White
 1:25 1:05 0:00 0:20 E
20 Smolinski81 Beauregard
 1:12 1:06 0:06 0:00 E
84 Latendresse20 Smolinski81 Beauregard
 1:12 0:30 0:42 0:00 E
Others 12:45 7:11 3:36 1:58 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
 14:47 9:55 0:42 4:10 -1
51 Bouillon25 Dandenault
 13:37 7:06 1:53 4:38 -1
24 Cote48 Rivers
 10:01 9:37 0:17 0:07 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
 6:15 1:15 5:00 0:00 E
48 Rivers25 Dandenault
 3:18 0:20 2:11 0:47 E
44 Hamrlik25 Dandenault
 2:23 0:00 0:48 1:35 E
24 Cote  3 O'Byrne
 1:55 1:22 0:33 0:00 -1
51 Bouillon48 Rivers
 1:29 0:30 0:59 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik48 Rivers
 1:22 0:50 0:23 0:09 E
Others 4:53 3:04 0:10 1:22 -1

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Ryder 69.3% 41.3% 28.0%  
Ryder 22.4% 7.3%   15.1%
Begin-Ryder 3.8%   3.8%  
D'Agostini 1.6%     1.6%
Lemieux-Ryder 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 1.3% 1.0%   0.3%
Totals   51.2% 31.8% 17.0%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin 28.8% 5.3% 1.7% 21.8%
Begin-Beauregard 26.5% 20.3% 6.0% 0.2%
D'Agostini-Beauregard 9.8%   9.8%  
Latendresse-Beauregard 6.4% 2.6% 3.7%  
Beauregard 6.4% 5.8% 0.5%  
Others 22.2% 6.8% 10.4% 5.0%
Totals   40.9% 32.1% 27.0%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski 40.4% 7.4% 2.4% 30.6%
Smolinski-Beauregard 37.2% 28.5% 8.4% 0.2%
Koivu-Ryder 4.7%   4.7%  
Lapierre 4.5%     4.5%
Beauregard 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 9.2% 9.2%    
Totals   49.1% 15.5% 35.4%
36 D'Agostini
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Manlow-Lapierre 33.4% 29.2% 4.2%  
Lapierre 17.0%     17.0%
Smolinski-Beauregard 12.9%   12.9%  
  9.9%     9.9%
Manlow-Smolinski 6.1% 0.9% 5.1%  
Others 20.7% 14.4% 3.4% 2.9%
Totals   44.6% 25.6% 29.8%
37 Manlow
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-D'Agostini 53.3% 46.7% 6.7%  
Smolinski-Beauregard 9.9% 0.9% 8.9%  
Smolinski-D'Agostini 9.7% 1.5% 8.2%  
Lapierre 8.4% 8.4%    
D'Agostini 7.8% 7.8%    
Others 11.0% 8.6% 2.4%  
Totals   73.8% 26.2%  
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Manlow-D'Agostini 42.4% 37.1% 5.3%  
D'Agostini 21.6%     21.6%
Manlow 6.6% 6.6%    
Begin 5.3%     5.3%
Latendresse-D'Agostini 5.0% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3%
Others 19.1% 15.8% 1.9% 1.3%
Totals   60.9% 9.6% 29.5%
53 Urquhart
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lemieux-White 67.4% 67.4%    
White 13.1% 10.0%   3.1%
Latendresse-White 6.9% 3.5% 3.4%  
Lemieux-White-Lapierre 3.4% 3.4%    
Manlow-D'Agostini 3.1% 1.7% 1.4%  
Others 6.1% 6.1%    
Totals   92.2% 4.8% 3.1%
54 White
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lemieux-Urquhart 63.3% 63.3%    
Urquhart 12.3% 9.4%   2.9%
Lemieux-Smolinski 6.8% 0.3%   6.5%
Latendresse-Urquhart 6.5% 3.3% 3.2%  
Lemieux-Lapierre 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 7.2% 7.2%    
Totals   87.4% 3.2% 9.4%
63 Lemieux
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Urquhart-White 73.5% 73.5%    
Smolinski-White 7.9% 0.3%   7.5%
Lapierre-White 4.5% 4.5%    
D'Agostini 3.7% 3.7%    
Urquhart-White-Lapierre 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 6.7% 6.0% 0.7%  
Totals   91.8% 0.7% 7.5%
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Koivu 66.4% 39.6% 26.8%  
Koivu 21.5% 7.0%   14.5%
Latendresse-Smolinski 5.1% 2.6% 2.5%  
Begin-Koivu 3.7%   3.7%  
Lemieux-Koivu 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   52.6% 33.0% 14.5%
81 Beauregard
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Smolinski 44.3% 34.0% 10.0% 0.3%
D'Agostini-Smolinski 16.4%   16.4%  
Smolinski 10.6% 9.7% 0.9%  
Latendresse-Smolinski 10.6% 4.4% 6.2%  
Manlow-Smolinski 7.8% 0.7% 7.1%  
Others 10.2% 8.9% 1.3%  
Totals   57.8% 41.9% 0.3%
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 74.2% 44.3% 30.0%  
Smolinski-Beauregard 7.8% 3.2% 4.5%  
Smolinski-Ryder 5.7% 2.9% 2.8%  
Urquhart-White 4.8% 2.5% 2.4%  
Lapierre-D'Agostini 3.7% 1.0% 1.7% 1.0%
Others 3.8% 3.2% 0.5%  
Totals   57.1% 41.9% 1.0%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 79.6% 53.4% 3.8% 22.4%
Cote 10.3% 7.4% 3.0%  
Dandenault 4.8% 4.4% 0.4%  
Rivers 4.5% 4.5%    
Bouillon-Dandenault 0.5%   0.5%  
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   70.0% 7.6% 22.4%
17
Partner Total EV PP SH
  0.0%      
Totals   70.0% 7.6% 22.4%
24 Cote
Partner Total EV PP SH
Rivers 75.1% 72.1% 2.1% 0.9%
O'Byrne 14.4% 10.3% 4.1%  
  5.6%     5.6%
Dandenault 2.8% 2.5%   0.3%
Bouillon 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   87.0% 6.3% 6.8%
25 Dandenault
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 65.9% 34.4% 9.1% 22.4%
Rivers 16.0% 1.6% 10.6% 3.8%
Hamrlik 11.5%   3.9% 7.7%
O'Byrne 4.3% 4.0% 0.3%  
Cote 1.8% 1.6%   0.2%
Others 0.5%   0.5%  
Totals   41.6% 24.4% 34.1%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 58.0% 38.9% 2.7% 16.4%
Bouillon 24.5% 4.9% 19.6%  
Dandenault 9.4%   3.1% 6.2%
Rivers 5.4% 3.3% 1.5% 0.6%
  2.3%     2.3%
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   47.5% 27.0% 25.5%
48 Rivers
Partner Total EV PP SH
Cote 56.5% 54.2% 1.6% 0.7%
Dandenault 18.6% 1.9% 12.3% 4.4%
Bouillon 8.4% 2.8% 5.5%  
Hamrlik 7.7% 4.7% 2.2% 0.8%
O'Byrne 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   72.5% 21.6% 5.9%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dandenault 62.9% 32.8% 8.7% 21.4%
Hamrlik 28.9% 5.8% 23.1%  
Rivers 6.9% 2.3% 4.5%  
Cote 0.8% 0.8%    
O'Byrne-Dandenault 0.5%   0.5%  
Totals   41.8% 36.8% 21.4%
Back to main page