Next: Broadcasting, Up: Vectorization and Faster Code Execution [Contents][Index]
To a very good first approximation, the goal in vectorization is to write code that avoids loops and uses whole-array operations. As a trivial example, consider
for i = 1:n
for j = 1:m
c(i,j) = a(i,j) + b(i,j);
endfor
endfor
compared to the much simpler
c = a + b;
This isn’t merely easier to write; it is also internally much easier to optimize. Octave delegates this operation to an underlying implementation which, among other optimizations, may use special vector hardware instructions or could conceivably even perform the additions in parallel. In general, if the code is vectorized, the underlying implementation has more freedom about the assumptions it can make in order to achieve faster execution.
This is especially important for loops with "cheap" bodies. Often it suffices to vectorize just the innermost loop to get acceptable performance. A general rule of thumb is that the "order" of the vectorized body should be greater or equal to the "order" of the enclosing loop.
As a less trivial example, instead of
for i = 1:n-1 a(i) = b(i+1) - b(i); endfor
write
a = b(2:n) - b(1:n-1);
This shows an important general concept about using arrays for indexing instead of looping over an index variable. See Index Expressions. Also use boolean indexing generously. If a condition needs to be tested, this condition can also be written as a boolean index. For instance, instead of
for i = 1:n
if (a(i) > 5)
a(i) -= 20
endif
endfor
write
a(a>5) -= 20;
which exploits the fact that a > 5 produces a boolean index.
Use elementwise vector operators whenever possible to avoid looping
(operators like .* and .^). See Arithmetic Operators.
Also exploit broadcasting in these elementwise operators both to avoid looping and unnecessary intermediate memory allocations. See Broadcasting.
Use built-in and library functions if possible. Built-in and compiled functions are very fast. Even with an m-file library function, chances are good that it is already optimized, or will be optimized more in a future release.
For instance, even better than
a = b(2:n) - b(1:n-1);
is
a = diff (b);
Most Octave functions are written with vector and array arguments in mind. If you find yourself writing a loop with a very simple operation, chances are that such a function already exists. The following functions occur frequently in vectorized code:
Next: Broadcasting, Up: Vectorization and Faster Code Execution [Contents][Index]