The while
statement creates a loop that executes a specified statement
as long as the test condition evaluates to true. The condition is evaluated before
executing the statement.
Syntax
while (condition)
statement
condition
- : An expression evaluated before each pass through the loop. If this condition
evaluates to true,
statement
is executed. When condition evaluates to false, execution continues with the statement after thewhile
loop.
- : An expression evaluated before each pass through the loop. If this condition
evaluates to true,
statement
Examples
Using while
The following while
loop iterates as long as n
is less than
three.
let n = 0;
let x = 0;
while (n < 3) {
n++;
x += n;
}
Each iteration, the loop increments n
and adds it to x
.
Therefore, x
and n
take on the following values:
- After the first pass:
n
= 1 andx
= 1 - After the second pass:
n
= 2 andx
= 3 - After the third pass:
n
= 3 andx
= 6
After completing the third pass, the condition n
< 3 is no longer true,
so the loop terminates.
Using an assignment as a condition
In some cases, it can make sense to use an assignment as a condition. This comes with readability tradeoffs, so there are certain stylistic recommendations that would make the pattern more obvious for everyone.
Consider the following example, which iterates over a document's comments, logging them to the console.
const iterator = document.createNodeIterator(document, NodeFilter.SHOW_COMMENT);
let currentNode;
while (currentNode = iterator.nextNode()) {
console.log(currentNode.textContent.trim());
}
That's not completely a good-practice example, due to the following line specifically:
while (currentNode = iterator.nextNode()) {
The effect of that line is fine — in that, each time a comment node is found:
iterator.nextNode()
returns that comment node, which gets assigned tocurrentNode
.- The value of
currentNode = iterator.nextNode()
is therefore truthy. - So the
console.log()
call executes and the loop continues.
…and then, when there are no more comment nodes in the document:
iterator.nextNode()
returnsnull
.- The value of
currentNode = iterator.nextNode()
is therefore alsonull
, which is falsy. - So the loop ends.
The problem with this line is: conditions typically use comparison operators such as ===
, but the =
in that line isn't a comparison operator — instead, it's an assignment operator. So that =
looks like it's a typo for ===
— even though it's not actually a typo.
Therefore, in cases like that one, some code-linting tools such as ESLint's no-cond-assign
rule — in order to help you catch a possible typo so that you can fix it — will report a warning such as the following:
Expected a conditional expression and instead saw an assignment.
Many style guides recommend more explicitly indicating the intention for the condition to be an assignment. You can do that minimally by putting additional parentheses as a grouping operator around the assignment:
const iterator = document.createNodeIterator(document, NodeFilter.SHOW_COMMENT);
let currentNode;
while ((currentNode = iterator.nextNode())) {
console.log(currentNode.textContent.trim());
}
In fact, this is the style enforced by ESLint's no-cond-assign
's default configuration, as well as Prettier, so you'll likely see this pattern a lot in the wild.
Some people may further recommend adding a comparison operator to turn the condition into an explicit comparison:
while ((currentNode = iterator.nextNode()) !== null) {
There are other ways to write this pattern, such as:
while ((currentNode = iterator.nextNode()) && currentNode) {
Or, forgoing the idea of using a while
loop altogether:
const iterator = document.createNodeIterator(document, NodeFilter.SHOW_COMMENT);
for (
let currentNode = iterator.nextNode();
currentNode;
currentNode = iterator.nextNode()
) {
console.log(currentNode.textContent.trim());
}
If the reader is sufficiently familiar with the assignment as condition pattern, all these variations should have equivalent readability. Otherwise, the last form is probably the most readable, albeit the most verbose.